• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    March 2018
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb    
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Orville on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Desi Chinese on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Oto ekspertiz Kaç li… on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Al Dajjal (@AlDajjal… on Where are the “Moderate…
    esgort on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
  • Archives

  • Advertisements

Racist Professor Asks “Can My Children Be Friends With White People?”

Where does one even begin with this level of absurdity?  This so-called professor of law posits the question “Can My Children Be Friends With White People?”, and unequivocally answers with “NO.”  He uses lots of broad brush arguments with no basis in fact that I would assume he KNOWS would never hold up in court, and would be immediately thrown out as hearsay and slander.  He is a “law” professor, right?  Let’s look at some of the more egregious examples of his projectionism and hypocrisy.

“Donald Trump’s election has made it clear that I will teach my boys the lesson generations old, one that I for the most part nearly escaped.”

As you do later in your diatribe, you are associating Donald Trump and his supporters with racism against blacks, yet you provide not one scintilla of evidence that Donald Trump is or has done anything racist against blacks.  I guess the approximately 8% of the black community who voted for Trump aren’t black enough for you?  Perhaps they are “Uncle Toms?”

“The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous dream of black and white children holding hands was a dream precisely because he realized that in Alabama, conditions of dominance made real friendship between white and black people impossible.”

Mr. Yankah is accusing an entire race of being racist, but in doing so is showing himself to be the bigoted racist.  There are SOME white people who are racist, just as there are SOME black people who are racist.  Mr. Yankah, why aren’t you embracing the words of the man whose coattails you hide behind by judging INDIVIDUALS by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin?  Hypocrite.

“History has provided little reason for people of color to trust white people in this way, and these recent months have put in the starkest relief the contempt with which the country measures the value of racial minorities.”

No reason to trust whites?  While blacks were at one time enslaved by whites (AND by blacks, AND by arab muslims), you were also freed by WHITES.  You were given the right to vote by WHITES.  The Civil Rights Act was passed by, you guessed it, WHITES.  The VAST majority of welfare dollars going to the black community is also be collected overwhelmingly from… wait for it… WHITES.  Sir, if you couldn’t trust whites, you would still be in chains working in cotton fields.  If you can read this, thank a WHITE Republican.

“America is transfixed on the opioid epidemic among white Americans (who often get hooked after being overprescribed painkillers — while studies show that doctors underprescribe pain medication for African-Americans). But when black lives were struck by addiction, we cordoned off minority communities with the police and threw away an entire generation of black and Hispanic men.”

Notice what the disingenuous “professor” of law does here.  He does the bait and switch.  He tries to equate the opioid problem in the white community with the illicit trade and addiction problems of crack, heroin, and meth in the black community.  Both are horrible, but they are NOT the same thing.  One who is prescribed opioids by a doctor is generally taking them for pain associated with a medical procedure, at least initially.  Those who take and become addicted to crack, meth, and/or heroine do it by CHOICE from the beginning.

“I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with white people is possible.”

You, sir, are a flaming racist, projecting your own faults onto people whom you have never met, and do not know.  You are making a sweeping generalization that is PURELY based on race while pointing the finger of racism at others.  Hypocrite.

“Only white people can cordon off Mr. Trump’s political meaning, ignore the “unpleasantness” from a position of safety.”

EXCUSE ME????  WHO has been more in danger since Trump was elected, and just as much during Barack Obama’s presidency???  You can’t continue the bullcrap lie that blacks are being targeted by white cops, or are being murdered by whites at some abnormally high rate.  The ACTUAL crime statistics prove that to be entirely false.  The ACTUAL crime statistics prove that blacks are MANY times more likely to be murdered by a BLACK person than by a white person.  They also prove that a white person is more likely to be killed by a black person than a white person.  But let’s go back to the “fear” thing.  Are their roving bands of whites roaming the inner cities LITERALLY hunting black people?  No.  There ARE mobs of blacks beating up whites.  How about things like the “knockout” “game?” Most perpetrators have been black attacking whites.  If there is ANY group that should be afraid of another based on the evidence, it is whites who should be “suspicious” of blacks.  But I don’t advocate the broad brush racism that you do.  I advocate a situational suspicion instead of a race-based suspicion.  If an angry mob of ANY color of people is moving toward you, you don’t wait around to see if they want to be friends.  If someone is pointing a gun at you, it doesn’t matter what skin color they are.  If someone is passing laws that are detrimental to your freedom and liberty, it doesn’t matter what their skin color happens to be, right?

“So, too, is his history of housing discrimination,…”

Again, you offer ZERO proof of your allegations.  Just like the rest of the Alinsky-left, you are just slinging mud to see what sticks.  You are repeating progressive media talking points with no citation, or research of your own.  You’re supposed to be a freaking LAW professor.  You of all people should know you don’t build a case on hearsay.

“…his casual conflation of Muslims with terrorists,…”

See above.  He has NEVER said that all muslims are terrorists.  He has POINTED OUT that many of the terrorist attacks in this country have been committed by MUSLIMS, most of whom were IMMIGRANTS or “REFUGEES” who were NEVER PROPERLY VETTED.  Donald Trump has been attempting to put in place travel and immigration restrictions on the VERY SAME countries that BARACK OBAMA did.  So, are you going to be intellectually honest and call Barack Obama an islamophobe and racist now?  No, you’re too much of an intellectually weak coward to be that even handed.

“…his reducing Mexican-Americans to murderers and rapists.”

TRUMP. NEVER. SAID. THIS.  You are quoting a viral MISQUOTATION of Donald Trump when he said that there are SOME bad people, rapists and murderers, coming across our border.  And he is FACTUALLY, 100% CORRECT to say so.  Does MS-13 ring a bell?  Do you read the news AT ALL?  There are dozens of stories every week of illegal aliens killing Americans, stealing identities, and all sorts of other crimes, ON TOP OF THEIR ORIGINAL CRIME OF COMING HERE ILLEGALLY.  Oh, and you refer to a group of “Mexican-Americans.”  I say you’re either American, or you’re whatever nationality the country you came from calls its citizens.  If you become an American citizen, there can be no dual loyalty.  One cannot serve two masters.  There can be no hyphens.

“They bristle at the accusation that they supported racism, insisting they had to ignore Mr. Trump’s ugliness.”

So, if I as a white American say that I do not support or condone racism in any way, I am to be dismissed and labeled a racist despite the COMPLETE LACK OF EVIDENCE that would back any assertion of racism, but if YOU say you’re not a racist, despite an entire article of evidence which the New York Times has published for you, we’re supposed to just believe you?  Again, Mr. Morally Superior Black Man, I point you back to the message of MLK, Jr. which you hide behind and PRETEND to embrace.  He would disavow you in a heartbeat, you noisy cymbal and clanging gong.

“They protest: Have they ever said anything racist? Don’t they shovel the sidewalk of the new black neighbors? Surely, they say, politics — a single vote — does not mean we can’t be friends.”

Yes, you jackwagon.  That’s EXACTLY what we say, and BELIEVE.  I don’t care if my neighbor is black, white, latino, oriental, Indian, Native American, etc.  I care that my neighbor ISN’T AN A**HOLE.

“My bi-ethnic wife, my most trusted friend, understands she is seen as a white woman, even though her brother and father are not. Among my dearest friends, the wedding party and children’s godparents variety, many are white.”

Funny how if a white person points out that they have black friends, or even a black spouse, people like YOU immediately say they have a “token black” friend to “hide their racism.”  Do you see the irony here?

As a self-respecting PERSON, I would be ashamed to pen my name to such an ignorant, racist piece of drivel as this NYT article by Mr. Ekow N. Yankah. However, the left has no shame, and doesn’t seem to have a problem exposing their own ignorance, racism, hatred, and hypocrisy. In fact, they seem to be wearing them as badges of “honor.”

Link to article:  https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/11/opinion/sunday/interracial-friendship-donald-trump.html


DNC Working Hand-in-Hand With the Queen of Pay-for-Play

Hillary Clinton is the undisputed queen of pay-for-play.  Everyone knows it, she has been caught doing it, and would be in jail for it if the corrupt regime were not shielding her.  FBI Director James Comey laid out the complete case for her prosecution, but then said he was not recommending prosecution.  He defined “gross negligence” with her demonstrated actions (which is what the governing statute requires for prosecution), but then said her actions did not warrant prosecution.  He CLEARLY demonstrated her intent to break the law, and hide/mishandle highly classified information, even though proving intent is not required to prosecute someone under the laws governing the handling of classified information.  And then, you guessed it, he said she showed no intent.  James Comey could have just come out and said that they found nothing, but he took the unusual step of laying out the crimes of Hillary Clinton for all to see right before confounding everyone by saying he was not recommending prosecution.  My guess is that he didn’t want to wind up dead like so many others in the trail of dead bodies along the Clinton’s path to power.

Now we have EVEN MORE PROOF of illegal behavior and corruption of Hillary Clinton and the democrat apparatus.  But based on what we have been shown by James Comey, Loretta Lynch-mob, and Barack Obama, we know that the rule of law in America is now dead.  There are clearly two sets of rules and laws in this country now, one for we the unwashed masses, and another for the self-proclaimed elites.  They view us as the peasants in “History of the World Part 1.”

Regardless, there is only so much of this kind of outright corruption, this “Teflon Donna” persona,  this “let them eat cake” attitude that people will take before they do something about her, even if the government and federal selectivelaw enforcement” refuse to do anything.  The best option is defeating her in November.  But should she and the democrat machine manage to cheat Hillary’s way into the White House, which is highly likely, then simply voting will mean nothing anymore.  Direct action by Americans will be required not only to remove her, but to restore the rule of law.

Side note on cheating:  Granting clemency to hundreds of thousands of convicted criminals to allow them to vote (Virginia governor Terry Mcauliffe, long time Clinton supporter), and registering millions of illegal aliens to vote (California) while fighting efforts to require voter ID and proof of citizenship are just three of the many ways democrats are pursuing to ensure that they gain permanent power, and that YOU and all other citizens are marginalized.

Leaked DNC Documents Show Plans To Reward Big Donors With Federal Appointments

Photo of Chuck RossChuck Ross

Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Trump Is ‘Nothing Short Of Un-American’ [screen shot CNN]

(follow link to original article at bottom for video)

Democratic National Committee documents recently released by WikiLeaks include spreadsheets and emails that appear to show party officials planning which donors and prominent fundraisers to provide with appointments to federal boards and commissions.

The documents, which were circulated among top DNC officials in April, could raise legal questions for the party, says Ken Boehm, the chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.

“The disclosed DNC emails sure look like the potential Clinton Administration has intertwined the appointments to federal government boards and commissions with the political and fund raising operations of the Democratic Party,” Boehm told The Daily Caller.

“That is unethical, if not illegal.” Continue reading

Obama’s Legal Humiliation (over lack of legality)

Bottom line up front:  Obama broke a bunch of laws, doesn’t understand Marbury V. Madison, and conveniently ignores Minor V. Happersett.  All while illegally occupying the White house.  Simple, no?

The important stuff is highlighted in RED below (mostly last half of article).

Obama’s Legal Humiliation

Today,there is no American news outlet factually covering the illegal actions of the sitting President of the United States in context. Nor is there one consistently exposing the laws his administration has flagrantly broken,though this corruption now demonstrably permeates every level of the federal system.

Attorneys General Tom Horne,Arizona;Pam Bondi,Florida;Sam Olens,Georgia;Bill Schuette,Michigan;Scott Pruitt,Oklahoma;Marty Jackley,South Dakota;Alan Wilson,South Carolina;Greg Abbott,Texas;and Ken Cuccinelli of Virginia produced a joint memo on March 5th,2012 detailing 21 blatant violations of law committed by the Obama administration.

By now it is unsurprising the media has by and large ignored this announcement,although AG Cuccinelli did appear in an extended segment with CSPAN (the relevant segment can be found here) on March 18th.

Continue reading

Gunny Wants You to Vote to Protect Your 2nd Amendment Rights

“You know what makes me sad? YOU DO!!!!! Maybe we should chug on over to mamby pamby land where MAYBE we can find some self confidence (and a voter registration card) for you, ya’ jackwagon!”

Replace ALL of the Monkeys in Congress!

All you liberals who read the title of this post IMMEDIATELY started screaming “RACIST!!!” without even reading the post.  I assure you whining idiots that this post has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with racism.

It’s about the institutional inertia that has corrupted Washington, D.C.

Read on…

Monkeys —

Start with a cage containing five monkeys. Inside the cage, hang a banana on a string and place a set of stairs under it. Before long, a monkey will go to the stairs and start to climb towards the banana.

As soon as he touches the stairs, spray all the other monkeys with cold water. After a while another monkey makes the attempt with same result, all the other monkeys are sprayed with cold water. Pretty soon when another
Monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it.

Now, put the cold water away. Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new one. The new monkey sees the banana and wants to climb the

To his shock, all of the other monkeys attack him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs he will be assaulted.

Next, remove another of the original five monkeys and replace it with a new one.

The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous newcomer takes part in the punishment with enthusiasm.

Likewise, replace a third original monkey with a new one, then a fourth, then the fifth. Every time the newest monkey takes to the stairs he is attacked.

Most of the monkeys that are beating him up have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs or why they are participating in the beating of the newest monkey. After replacing all of the original monkeys, none of the remaining monkeys have ever been sprayed with cold water. Nevertheless, no monkey ever again approaches the stairs to try for the banana.

Why not?

Because as far as they know, that is the way it has always been done around here.

And that, my fellow monkeys, is how Congress operates….
We need to REPLACE all the original monkeys this November.

How Obama Responded to the Oath of Office

What Obama really said when the oath of office was administered

Hey, Atlas! Are Your Shoulders Tired Yet?

47% of Americans pay no federal taxes. 10% of taxpayers pay almost 75% of the tax burden. The top 1% of taxpayers pays nearly 50% of all taxes. Is this fair? If you say yes, you’re probably a socialist.

Zero-liability voters.  People who are allowed to vote with no idea of or concern for the consequences of their actions.  Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie.

The rapid growth of this government-created segment of society will ultimately be responsible for giving away our liberty.  They are allowed to vote with, as Obama put it, “no skin in the game.” It’s “no wonder” why so many “don’t really care how much a government program costs. It’s not costing them anything.” Any taxes they pay are more than offset by tax credits and other goodies they get back at taxpayer expense.

Once upon a time, one had to be a land owner to be qualified to vote.  That probably isn’t practical today, but being someone who actually pays taxes is a very reasonable prerequisite to being allowed to cast a vote.  Why should someone who pays no taxes, and receives money and benefits forcibly taken from those who do, be allowed to decide how the money of taxpayers is spent?  That’s like the bank robber being allowed to design the security system for a bank.  They will vote/design a way for themselves to be able to get an increasing amount of something for nothing on their part.

When you continue to unfairly burden the producers, it will ultimately be the rest of us who suffer.  Look at California.  That state has lost thousands of jobs in the last several years.  Industries from computer parts manufacturers and auto parts suppliers have closed their doors in California and moved elsewhere, leaving many new unemployed.  Why did they leave?  One word: TAXES.  The socialists in CA kept spending and spending, handing out billions of dollars to illegal aliens, and to many others who had no claim to the benefits of the revenues collected.  The CA government was spending far more than they collected, so what did they do?  They increased taxes.  Employers large and small felt the pinch as their profits shrank, along with their ability to pay employees.  Many were either forced to close their doors, or chose to move their business to a more business-friendly climate.  This put even more taxpayers out of a job, thus further shrinking revenues in the state.  The CA government’s answer?  Raise taxes even more, but don’t even think about cutting spending.  Businesses and people are now fleeing the state in droves.  They have finally, although far too late, come to the conclusion that they have to start trimming the fat.  But they aren’t willing to trim enough.  Now they are putting out their hands to Washington for a “bailout.”

Do you know why the CA government was in a position to spend their state into oblivion?  Because the CA voters kept re-electing them. Should it now fall on the shoulders of the taxpayers from the other 49 states to subsidize the failure and bad decisions of Californians?  Not just “no,” but “HE** NO!”  Just as taxpayers from all 50 states should not have had to foot he bill to subsidize the failure and poor business practices of the auto manufacturers, banks, or insurance companies.  When you follow the money trails, their failure can be traced back to government interference and manipulation.  Now we have to fund the governments greed and power thirst.  This has to stop.

So, is it fair for those who contribute nothing to tell those who do how much they must contribute?  No.  Only those who have “skin in the game” should get that right.  Those who vote should also have to demonstrate a basic level of education and knowledge of American history and government, i.e. the constitution.

When you have the stars of Jay Leno’s “Jay Walking” segments deciding the future of this nation, Atlas (the producers) who holds up our nation and world will shrug his shoulders and say “the price is too high.”  Then the “Jay Walking” all-stars will be left standing around with their hands out asking where their next hand out is coming from.  They aren’t going to like the answer.

Representation Without Taxation: Little Media Notice for How Nearly Half Pay No Income Tax

Everyone should pay their fair share

%d bloggers like this: