Biden AGAIN Trying to “Forgive” Other People’s Debt with YOUR Money

Even after being shot down by the courts, Biden and the democrats just will not stop trying to do unconstitutional things. In this case, we’re talking about the student loan “forgiveness” program. They are putting forward five groups of people that initially qualify for the vote-buying giveaway program they are trying to institute. These are the categories Biden is assigning to people for “loan forgiveness:”

1. Loans repaid more than 25 years ago

• These were the adults in the room who lived up to their obligations. Leave them alone. 

2. Loans with balances greater than the original amount borrowed

3. Loans for career training programs that resulted in “unreasonable debt loads or provided insufficient earnings”

• These people CHOSE to get loans for degrees like “women’s studies,” 18th century lesbian poetry, and underwater basket weaving. Sorry, you should have chosen more wisely.  Now live like a pauper and repay your loan like the adults did.

4. Eligible for forgiveness under other repayment plans but have not applied for it

• There should be no such category under the FEDERAL government. This is vote buying.

5. Experiencing financial hardship that current student loan system does not currently adequately address

• See “vote buying” above.

There is no line of text in the Constitution that empowers the federal government to confiscate wealth from one individual and redistribute it to another for these purposes. KNOCK IT OFF.

Link to article: https://www.oann.com/newsroom/biden-admin-updates-its-student-debt-forgiveness-plan/

America’s Funeral Procession

To the US Supreme Court who refused to even hear the case that is CLEARLY under their jurisdiction, instead choosing to hide behind “procedure,” to the judges at the state level who are legislating from the bench, to the politicians at all levels who didn’t stop them, or were in league with them, you need to understand this. The funeral pyres of America have been lit, and as you watch America burn, as you watch the coming civil war rip us apart, as you cower in horror as the angry mobs kick in your door to drag you into the streets, your last thoughts should be “I could have stopped this.” May God have mercy on us all.

https://clashdaily.com/2020/12/in-7-2-decision-scotus-shoots-down-texas-suit-without-even-hearing-it-here-are-the-deets/

Did You Know That You’re Not Entitled to Receive Social Security Even Though You Paid For It?

Funny that CITIZENS are required to pay into Social Security, but the government isn’t required to give us what we pay for. 

Social Security is BY DEFINITION a Ponzi scheme made legal by the same government that sends others to jail for Ponzi schemes, because the government has the weight of force to implement it.

---

---

United States Supreme Court

FLEMMING v. NESTOR, (1960)

No. 54

Argued: February 24, 1960    Decided: June 20, 1960

2. A person covered by the Social Security Act has not such a right in old-age benefit payments as would make every defeasance of “accrued” interests violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Pp. 608-611.

(a) The noncontractual interest of an employee covered by the Act cannot be soundly analogized to that of the holder of an annuity, whose right to benefits are based on his contractual premium payments.Pp. 608-610.

(b) To engraft upon the Social Security System a concept of “accrued property rights” would deprive it of the flexibility and [363 U.S. 603, 604] boldness in adjustment to ever-changing conditions which it demands and which Congress probably had in mind when it expressly reserved the right to alter, amend or repeal any provision of the Act. Pp. 610-611.

 

Reference:  https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/363/603.html

The Kavanaugh Betrayal: Who’s Responsible

Mr. Farah makes a convincing argument.  I’m still waiting to see what rationale Kavanaugh gives for siding with Murder, Inc., and for continuing to allow the federal government to subsidize their murder mill with our tax dollars.

Well, Mr. Kavanaugh?  We’re waiting.

+

---

---

The Kavanaugh betrayal!

Posted By Joseph Farah On 12/10/2018 @ 7:29

I hate to say it, but I saw this one coming.

When President Trump selected Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court, I knew it was at least a very risky pick.

But he won the hearts of conservatives because of the insanity of the opposition.

Now we know, for certain, that Brett Kavanaugh is a fraud. He should never have been President Trump’s first choice. He’s a weakling. He buckled to the extreme left to salvage his own reputation. I had a bad feeling about this guy – ever since his role in the Vincent Foster cover-up and his tutelage by former independent counsel Kenneth Starr.

How many times do we have to see this kind of betrayal by Republican nominees of Supreme Court justices – Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, John Roberts?

Kavanaugh Joins Left to Protect Planned Parenthood

Justice Kavanaugh, we need an explanation. Justice Gorsuch has sometimes voted with the liberals, but has always had a constitutional conservative, and legal rationale for doing so. Perhaps you do as well, although I’m having trouble seeing how states can be denied the right to deny funds from supporting something that is morally reprehensible, and NOT protected under the Constitution.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Kavanaugh Joins Liberals To Protect Pro-Planned Parenthood Ruling

Kevin Daley | Supreme Court Reporter | 11:34 AM 12/10/2018 |

The Supreme Court declined to review three cases relating to Republican efforts to defund Planned Parenthood at the state level Monday, over a vigorous dissent from Justice Clarence Thomas.

The dissent was significant because it indicates that Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with the high court’s liberal wing to deny review of a lower court decision that favored the nation’s largest abortion provider.

“So what explains the Court’s refusal to do its job here?,” Thomas wrote. “I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood.’”

“Some tenuous connection to a politically fraught issue does not justify abdicating our judicial duty,” Thomas added. “If anything, neutrally applying the law is all the more important when political issues are in the background.”

Read”>https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5498306-Dissent-From-Cert-Denial-Gee-v-Planned.html”>Read Justice Thomas’ Dissent

Christine Blasey Ford’s Connections

Monica Had To Provide Proof

Will Hillary Clinton Run Again in 2020?

Hillary Clinton wants and seeks only ONE thing in life:  POWER.  If you understand that, everything she does makes sense.

Look at who Hillary Clinton is.  She has no morals.  Her values are anti-American and self-serving.  Her plan and vision for America will accelerate us down the path to becoming the next Venezuela.  She is a multi-time loser who can’t take the hint that AMERICA DOESN’T WANT YOU.  

Yet still, she persists.

It’s like watching John McCain grasping desperately, and SPITEFULLY, at the straws of power.  On his death bed, one would think he would want to spend his remaining days with his family instead of trying to do anything he could to thwart a non-establishment Republican president.  It’s almost like he’s bitter about his stinging loss to the amateur Marxist Obama, and if McCain couldn’t be the next Republican president (after all, it was “his turn,” right), then there’s no way he would let an upstart outsider like Trump succeed in that endeavor.  

If McCain makes it that long, maybe he’ll be Hillary’s running mate.  She’ll drag him around on a ventilator for the sympathy points.

+

---

---

Is Hillary Clinton secretly planning to run in 2020?

By Michael Goodwin    July 7, 2018 | 10:12pm

The messages convey a sense of urgency, and are coming with increasing frequency. They are short, focused reactions to the latest “outrage” committed by President Trump.

Some end by asking for money, some urge participation in protests. All read as if they are sent from the official headquarters of the resistance.

Hillary Clinton is up to something.

Amy Coney Barrett: Progressives Use Religious Ignorance, Bigotry to Slime SCOTUS Candidate | National Review

The left has always said “we can’t have a religious litmus test as a qualification for government office.” Oh, the irony that they are now openly using a RELIGIOUS LITMUS TEST to DISQUALIFY someone from public office. However, coming from the party that denied God three times at their presidential convention, and strives daily to remove God from every place in our society, this not surprising at all.

Democrats hate God, and the atheistic ideologies of socialism, communism, and Marxism that they embrace prove it.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Progressive efforts to block the highly qualified Amy Coney Barrett from the Supreme Court because of her faith betray our nation’s founding ideals.
— Read on www.nationalreview.com/2018/07/amy-coney-barrett-under-progressives-religiou-ignorance-bigotry-attack/

A President Who Never Does His Job Tells the Senate to Do Their Job

Obama and his hypocritical minions are waging an offensive claiming that the Constitution says the senate can’t prevent Obama from appointing a justice to replace Antonin Scalia.  It’s amusing that many of the same people saying the senate can’t stop Obama from appointing a justice were senators who did everything in their power as senators to prevent a Republican president from appointing a justice, even coming right out and saying in the case of Chuckie Schumer that he would prevent any nominee of George W. Bush from being voted on for the last 18 months of Bush’s presidency.  The current Vice President, Joe Biden, was one of the chief persecutors of Robert Bork, giving rise to the phrase “getting Borked.”  The democrats don’t have a leg to stand on in this debate.  As I heard it said about Mitch McConnell saying no Obama appointee would be approved, it was poor chess.  I agree with McConnell, and I pray he has the guts to say the course and not cave into Obama AGAIN, but he should have said nothing, submitted the liberal candidates to the same body cavity search they have submitted conservative appointees to until they withdrew themselves from consideration, but still never bring them up for a vote.

But assuming the not so conservative Republican leadership actually holds the line, the fear is that Obama will just do a recess appointment when the senate adjourns in January prior to the inauguration.  I would not put it past him, but I do not believe such action to be constitutional.  Here’s why.

A question I have posited elsewhere, if the Constitution says what it says, and doesn’t say what it doesn’t say, am I correct in interpreting Article 2, Sect 2 of the Constitution to say that POTUS can’t simply do a recess appointment for a “Supreme” Court justice because the senate is in recess, but that the vacancy he is attempting to fill must have occurred DURING THAT RECESS?

“The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.”

What do you think? I guess your answer depends on whether you think the Constitution is ACTUALLY the law of the land or not.

Was Justice Antonin Scalia Murdered?

A Supreme Court justice is found dead with a pillow over his face, in unwrinkled pajamas, after his security detail is told to stand down, coincidentally in a county where the cause of death can be legally pronounced on the scene, and no autopsy is then required, and the judge pronounced him dead of natural causes OVER THE PHONE.

If you want to fuel conspiracy theories, this is the way to do it.  Even though this is all conveniently legal because of Texas law, this is the first time I can remember the federal government NOT pushing to investigate to the max extent possible the death of one of their own.

Republicans in control of the House and the Senate, two crappy candidates for the democrats, Obama’s “fundamental transformation” stalled, and the only way to advance it being through the courts…  Yes, there’s a possibility that someone connected to Obama had Scalia killed, and the circumstances surrounding his death just open the door to these theories.

Have someone independently do one or more autopsies, just like they did for a simple street thug like Mike Brown.  They brought in coroners from the local, state, federal, and military sources to do autopsies on Brown to quell a LOCAL disturbance.  The death of Scalia has NATIONAL implications.  Shouldn’t we have the same due diligence in investigating the death of a pivotal Supreme Court justice?

Oh, by the way, the senate doesn’t owe Obama a vote or confirmation of his nominees to the court.  The same democrats who are whining most loudly about this are the same ones who obstructed EVERY Republican sponsored bill (Harry Reid), and also refused to bring up any George W. Bush nominee in the last year of HIS presidency (Chuck Schumer).  So, if they don’t like it, tough.  It’s time the Republicans start fighting as hard to protect our Constitution and nation as the democrats fight to destroy them.

Listen to Chuck Schumer decrying “judicial activism” in his own words.  He doesn’t mind it when it’s a LIBERAL judge legislating from the bench.

New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a powerful member of the Democratic leadership, said Friday the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2007/07/schumer-to-fight-new-bush-high-court-picks-005146#ixzz40LUoMzBG

Update:  More info

“For the rest of this president’s term and if there is another Republican elected with the same selection criteria let me say this: We should reverse the presumption of confirmation. The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito. Given the track record of this president and the experience of obfuscation at the hearings—with respect to the Supreme Court, at least—I will recommend to my colleagues that we should not confirm a Supreme Court nominee except in extraordinary circumstances.”

http://clashdaily.com/2016/02/sen-schumer-says/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:15023447&utm_campaign=Islam%20HATES%20This%20Woman%20Because%20She%E2%80%99s%20Not%20Cutting%20The%20%E2%80%98Poor%20Refugees%E2%80%99%20ANY%20Slack

Letter to ISIS: We could use a little help

Our government is completely out of control. We have a president who may not even be qualified to hold the office, but congress won’t even ask legitimate questions about his eligibility. He has violated the Constitution and broken the law so many times that they will have to add a new wing to the Library of Congress just to document all of his transgressions. He has been caught lying on video, in his own words, time and time again. In his latest constitutional violation, he said on video more than 20 times over 6 years that he didn’t have the constitutional authority to unilaterally change the immigration laws. Yet as soon as the midterm elections are over, what does he do? Unilaterally changes the law without congress. Then when he is confronted about previously saying that he didn’t have the authority to do so, he denies he ever said that, even going as far as saying “I can rewind the tapes for you.”

Where is congress while they are being rendered irrelevant by a tyrannical president? Cowering in the corner trying to preserve their perks and privileges, but doing NOTHING to exercise the checks and balances at their disposal to defend the Constitution. Rather than use the power of the purse which is exclusively theirs, or the power to impeach a runaway president, they further enable the out of control president by funding ALL of his unconstitutional agenda.

Where are the “Supreme” Court and the federal courts while the lawless president tramples the Constitution and breaks the law? They have been rendered irrelevant. Even in the few instances where they have ruled against Obama’s agenda, he has simply ignored the courts and done whatever he wants to do. Obama controls all of the agencies in government with the means to physically stop him. I’m pretty sure you won’t see Ruth Bader Ginsberg or John Roberts storming the White House with an AR and a knife in their teeth. Thus you have a lawless, tyrannical president whose STATED goal is the “fundamental transformation” of America, and neither of the other two branches designed to keep his branch of government in check doing anything to stop him.

What alternatives are left to heal the ailing patient that is our Constitution?

We administer a 3% solution of 2A.
+

---

Obama Demands Court Uphold His “Right” To Ignore Constitution

“Obama made it clear his Administration would ignore the court and its injunction regardless of what the judge may decide, claiming incorrectly that “…[the] injunction would have ‘nil’ effect, for the government would continue to possess the identical detention authority under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force…” Of course, that is a lie, as the AUMF applies only to known members of al Qaeda or the Taliban.”

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!! (scream of pained frustration)
IMPEACH THIS POWER HUNGRY, USURPING, LAW BREAKING, CONSTITUTION DESTROYING PIECE OF CRAP, AND I MEAN YESTERDAY.  In the many episodes of Obama violating the law (ignoring judges orders to lift drilling ban, ignoring the War Powers Act, breaking contract and bankruptcy laws, etc, etc) at least up to this point he was silent and just did it. Now he is BLATANTLY saying HE. WILL. NOT. OBEY. A. COURT. ORDER. He is emperor Obama. He is above the law. Or so he thinks.

CONGRESS, DO YOUR *&^%$%^* JOB AND IMPEACH THIS ENEMY OF THE REPUBLIC, OR WE WILL REMOVE YOU ALONG WITH HIM.

Every American must follow this story closely since the media has ignored it completely.  The media is now the enemy, and a mouthpiece for a corrupt, tyrannical government.  We, the people must restore accountability to the media and our government.

---

http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-demands-court-uphold-his-right-to-ignore-constitution/

August 15, 2012 By Doug Book

Obama’s Department of Justice is demanding a federal judge dismiss the injunction with which she sought to uphold the constitutional rights of the American people.

On May 16^th, federal judge Kathleen Forrest granted a preliminary injunction to plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against Barack Obama and the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA), striking down those sections of the Act that provide the president the power to indefinitely detain American citizens without benefit of their 5^th and 6^th Amendment rights.

Under the terms of the Act, Obama had been given exclusive authority to direct members of the US military to arrest and imprison anyone he believed to have “substantially supported” al Qaeda, the Taliban, or “associated forces.” When pressed by plaintiff’s attorneys about the practical extent of this authority, government lawyers admitted “…the NDAA does give the president the power to lock up people like journalist Chris Hedges and peaceful activists,” admitting that “…even war correspondents could be locked up indefinitely under the NDAA.”  (unlimited power in the hands of a tyrant who has repeatedly and consistently ignored the Constitution and our rights is a BAD thing)

Legal Experts Stunned by Roberts’ Obamacare Decision

Obamacare is so OBVIOUSLY unconstitutional that the legal “smart guys” were surprised by the ruling. I was disappointed, but not really surprised after seeing how the SC ruled on the Arizona case. Chief Justice Roberts has forgotten what his and the Supreme Court’s job really is. It is NOT to protect congress, or even the court, but to protect the CONSTITUTION. In Article 6 of the Constitution it says:

“…and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution…”

As spelled out in Title 28, Chapter I, Part 453 of the United States Code, each Supreme Court Justice takes the following oath:

“I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

Roberts screwed up.

---

http://blog.rwjf.org/humancapital/2012/07/04/legal-experts-were-completely-stunned-by-john-roberts-healthcare-opinion/#.UAf4FOJ37Uc.facebook

Legal Experts Were Completely Stunned By John Roberts’ Health Care Opinion

We all knew it would be close, but we never saw this coming: The Affordable Care Act survives, but only because Justice Roberts chose to characterize the individual mandate as a tax. The 5-4 outcome isn’t a surprise, but the particular reason is a big big surprise – one that virtually no one predicted (law professors included). How could we be so right, yet so wrong?

First, the unsurprising part:

The Coming ObamaTax Bomb

(updated to correct formatting, 7/2/2012; 8:22am)

Obama swore up and down that Obamacare was not a tax and taxes would not be increased as a result when he was selling it to us, then in the Supreme Court challenge Obama’s lawyer said it is a tax, the Supreme Court (wrongly IMO) agreed that it is a tax, but now the Obama administration and it’s defenders like Nancy “Pass-it-to-find-out-what’s-in-it/Botox Bolshevik” Pelosi are now coming out and saying it’s NOT a tax, but rather a PENALTY.  So it’s unconstitutional, and they know it, and they admit it until they are challenged in court, at which time they hide behind the “it’s a tax” argument which they swore it is not.  Got it?

So, it’s unconstitutionally constitutional.

Either way, your taxes are going up.  A LOT.  Many of the taxes directly associated with Obamacare/tax say they only apply to those making over $200K-$250K per year.  Even those taxes will have a ripple effect felt by lower income taxpayers.  Other taxes, such a medical device tax, will apply to anyone using them.  Combine the many, many taxes and fees in Obamacare/tax with the expiration of the Bush tax cuts, and the myriad regulations increasing the cost of doing business, and the average tax bill on an American family will go up by an estimated $4,000 per family next year.
+

---

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/06/29/the_coming_obamatax_bomb

July 2, 2012

By Katie Pavlich

6/29/2012

By now you know what the Supreme Court verdict is: ObamaCare is a tax. So what does that mean in terms of actual dollar amounts for Americans and businesses who will pay this new tax? The Heritage Foundation and Americans for Tax Reform have released a series of summaries, tables and charts to help families understand what this means for their wallet.

Heritage:

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)[1] imposes numerous tax hikes that transfer more than $500 billion over 10 years—and more in the future—from hardworking American families and businesses to Congress for spending on new entitlements and subsidies. In addition, higher tax rates on working and investing will discourage economic growth both now and in the future, further lowering the standard of living.

From ATR:

1. Excise Tax on Charitable Hospitals (Min$/immediate): $50,000 per hospital if they fail to meet new “community health assessment needs,” “financial assistance,” and “billing and collection” rules set by HHS. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,961-1,971

2. Codification of the “economic substance doctrine” (Tax hike of $4.5 billion).  This provision allows the IRS to disallow completely-legal tax deductions and other legal tax-minimizing plans just because the IRS deems that the action lacks “substance” and is merely intended to reduce taxes owed. Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 108-113