More than 100 Million Gun Owners Did NOT Kill Anyone Today, but Abortion Doctors Did ⋆ Constitution.com

Why is it that we correctly see one nut with a gun killing 59 people as horrific, but shrug our shoulders at one “doctor” with a scalpel who kills THOUSANDS of babies? Why aren’t 55 MILLION dead babies since Roe v. Wade making America sick to its collective stomach? What about blacks, who were/are SPECIFICALLY targeted by the eugenicists who brought us abortion? You would think that blacks would be doing everything they could to end abortion since it is being used to eliminate them BECAUSE they are black.

Using the “logic” of the left, shouldn’t we be banning scalpels?



Source: More than 100 Million Gun Owners Did NOT Kill Anyone Today, but Abortion Doctors Did ⋆ The US Constitution ⋆ Constitution.com

Advertisements

Boehner 2.0? Don’t Expect Much From Paul Ryan. He’s Already Surrendering

You remember John Boehner, don’t you?  You know.  That fake (R)epublican who as Speaker of the House oversaw an increase in the debt of more than $4 trillion.  That RINO who surrendered to Barack Obama at EVERY turn.  That gutless wonder who when given the leadership of the House said “What do you expect me to do? We only control one half of one branch of government?”  Then, when actual conservatives gave the GOP control of both houses, surrender-monkey Boehner said “What do you expect me to do?  Obama will just veto what we send him if we don’t give him what he wants.”  Yeah, that guy.  The one that everyone except democrats hated, and were ready to take up pitchforks and torches to run out of town.  The good news?  He’s now GONE.  Thank the Lord for that.  The bad news?  Boehner’s mini-me has been crowned as Speaker.

First of all, when Nancy Pelosi and many other democrats are praising Paul Ryan, you KNOW you’ve picked the wrong guy.  We didn’t have to wait long for confirmation.  Case in point, Ryan’s pre-battle surrender over defunding Planned Parenthood.

When you have an organization that has been PROVEN to be breaking the law, that is murdering millions of babies and selling their body parts for profit in violation of the law, that provides little in the way of actual healthcare services contrary to the claims of supporters, AND taxpayers are being forced to pay for it despite moral and religious objections, it should be a NO-BRAINER to end taxpayer funding for such an organization.

So, what does the new Speaker of the House Paul Ryan say about the fight to end taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood? 

“I think we need to be very clear about what we can and cannot achieve and not set expectations that we know we can’t reach given the constraints of the Constitution,”

The only reason Ryan and the GOP CAN’T achieve what conservatives want is because the establishment, spineless, surrender-monkeys refuse to even engage in battle for what is RIGHT.  They are only interested in keeping their seat at the table, no matter who they have to lie to so they can.  They are “conservatives” when they want to be reelected, but immediately betray those who put them in power as soon as the polls close.

What does this mean?  It means that the GOP led by establishment RINOs is merely the democrat wing of the Republican party.  We effectively have one party socialist rule now, with a small handful of conservatives leading the insurgency to restore constitutional sanity.

What it also means is that the same fervor that unseated Eric Cantor, forced Boehner to resign and retire, and prevented Kevin McCarthy from running for Speaker must be rekindled and fanned into an inferno to get rid of more RINOs.  I hate to say this, but we must FIGHT LIKE DEMOCRATS.  They are relentless in pursuit of their agenda.  I hope it’s not already too late to save this nation, but I fear it is.  We must keep fighting and save what we can.
+


Paul Ryan Doubtful About Defunding Planned Parenthood

November 1, 2015 5:02 pm

(CNN) – Paul Ryan doesn’t believe Planned Parenthood should get one “red cent” from taxpayers — but he cautioned Sunday against expectations that he’ll be able to pull federal funding for the organization now that he’s House speaker.

“I think we need to be very clear about what we can and cannot achieve and not set expectations that we know we can’t reach given the constraints of the Constitution,” Ryan told CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union.”

The women’s health organization has long drawn the ire of anti-abortion lawmakers, but efforts to pull federal funding for it increased after activists released undercover videos accusing Planned Parenthood of breaking federal laws by selling tissue and organs from aborted fetuses.

“I don’t think Planned Parenthood should get a red cent from the taxpayer. I’ve always believed that, even before these disgusting videos came out,” Ryan said. “But I believe we need to do our oversight. We’re just beginning to start a committee to investigate Planned Parenthood. That’s important. So the special committee on Planned Parenthood, I think, should be in the driver’s seat overseeing this process.”

Bash asked, “Will you defund Planned Parenthood?”

“This is what I mean when I say being an effective opposition party. I think being an effective opposition party means being honest with people upfront about what it is we can and cannot achieve,” he said.

“But we also have to push issues where we can push issues, we have to speak truth to power,” he added. “We have a president that isn’t willing to listen, that isn’t going to sign lots of our bills into law, we have a Senate that has a very difficult process when it comes to actually getting bills voted on, so knowing that we have those constraints, we have to operate within those constraints.”

http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/01/politics/paul-ryan-planned-parenthood/index.html

– See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/paul-ryan-doubtful-defunding-planned-parenthood-127593/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=paul-ryan-doubtful-defunding-planned-parenthood#sthash.QLf70KxA.dpuf

+


America: A Nation on Her Death Bed

What is the single biggest reason for this decay in our society?
Biblical illiteracy.

+
+


50 Facts That Show How Far America Has Fallen In This Generation

American-Flag-Tattered-Public-Domain-300x225

What has happened to America?  Please show these numbers to anyone that does not believe that the United States is in decline.  It is time for all of us to humble ourselves and face the reality of what has happened to our once great nation.  For those of us that love America, it is heartbreaking to watch the foundations of our society rot and decay in thousands of different ways.  The following are 50 facts that show how far America has fallen in this generation, but the truth is that this list could have been far, far longer…

#1 According to a survey that was just conducted, only 36 percent of all Americans can name the three branches of government.

#2 Only 25 percent of all Americans know how long U.S. Senators are elected for (6 years), and only 20 percent of all Americans know how many U.S. senators there are. Continue reading

Summary of the Obamacare Train Wreck

In a nutshell, here’s the summary of the careening trainwreck of economic destruction and forced government dependency that is the implementation of Obamacare.  Take time to read through all the article, and to seek out other information about the destruction of our liberty. If we don’t resist this, even at the risk of going without health insurance, or going to jail, we are finished.



“Do I fix Obamacare, address the massive spending problem and skyrocketing debt, and work on helping the imploding economy? Or do I go fundraising?”
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/obama-poised-for-fundraising-spree-98745.html

Sebelius to Attend Gala, but Unable to Testify About Obamacare. Fixing the problems with Obamacare must not be that important.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/sebelius-attend-gala-unable-testify-about-obamacare_763713.html

It’s worse than we know…
http://www.nationaljournal.com/white-house/why-obama-should-be-freaked-out-over-obamacare-20131021

Builders of Obama’s health website saw red flags; Obama paid $400 million to a CANADIAN company to design website
http://news.yahoo.com/builders-obamas-health-website-saw-red-flags-070429400.html

Dickerson: Obama Headed Toward “Credibility Death Spiral” On Obamacare
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/10/21/john_dickerson_obama_headed_toward_credibility_death_spiral_over_obamacare.html

Obama hints that govt ‘shutdown’ is tied to Obamacare rollout; as usual his narcissism prevents him from accepting ANY blame for his bastard creation.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-ties-govt-shutdown-obamacare-rollout_763765.html

Obama administration: Lawmakers, staff can get abortion coverage (Taxpayer funded abortion which they denied was in the law)
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/30/white-house-lawmakers-staff-get-abortion-coverage/

At President’s Urging, People Call Exchange Hotline But Can’t Get Through
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/361771/presidents-urging-people-call-exchange-hotline-cant-get-through-andrew-johnson

Jay “Porky Pig” Carney can’t answer the mail on Obama and the Obamacare stupidity
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/361800/jay-carneys-worst-press-briefing-alec-torres?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Canada has death panels. It WILL be the case here.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/10/canada_has_death_panels_and_that_s_a_good_thing.html

476,000 People “May” Have Signed Up For Obamacare. Real numbers MUCH smaller
http://downtrend.com/emilyh/476000newapplicants/

Healthcare.gov Refers Users to Uncertified Navigators and Assisters
http://pjmedia.com/blog/breaking-identity-theft-russian-roulette-healthcare-gov-refers-users-to-uncertified-navigators-and-assisters/

People could end up paying DOUBLE of what they see on the website
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505269_162-57608843/healthcare.gov-pricing-feature-can-be-off-the-mark/

Obamacare law and website tell you that you “have no reasonable expectation of privacy” on Healthcare.gov, but while you get a body cavity search from the IRS and NSA, government workers are using a “personal privacy” exemption in the law to shield them from scrutiny.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/feds-invoke-privacy-to-shield-public-employees-while-snooping-on-americans/article/2537682

YOUR tax dollars are being used to sell Obamacare
http://washingtonexaminer.com/super-bowl-champ-baltimore-ravens-getting-paid-130000-to-promote-obamacare/article/2537602

Ted Cruz and conservatives are ‘terrorists’ for wanting to delay Obamacare, but democrats now wanting to delay it UNTIL AFTER THEY GET REELECTED are somehow reasonable
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obamacare-mandate-may-be-delayed-2013-10-23?link=MW_home_latest_news

The same people who are going to ruin you financially whether or not you buy Obamacare owe millions in back taxes.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/10/23/700-IRS-contract-workers-owe–54M-in-back-taxes

Hawaii Relaunching Obamacare Exchange After Not Selling Any Health Insurance Due To Software Problems
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/10/10/hawaii-relaunching-obamacare-exchange-after-not-selling-any-health-insurance-due-to-software-problems/

Only 5 Iowans Have Signed Up for Obamacare
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/report-only-5-iowans-have-signed-obamacare_762379.html


The Top 50 Liberal Media Bias Examples

I really find it amusing, and at the same time frustrating, when liberals try to deny a liberal media bias. They ignore the overwhelming pro-liberal/anti-conservative reporting from the mainstream media outlets, while continually whining about the lone conservative “mainstream” media outlet, that being Fox News. They act as if there were a thousand Fox News type outlets, and that the liberal outlets were the minority. Don’t you just love Alinsky tactics?

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

The Top 50 Liberal Media Bias Examples

December 10, 2011 by Warner Todd Huston

Examples of Liberal Media Bias

Let’s face it, liberal media bias has been around since there have been liberals to do the “reporting” of the news. But this fact should surprise no one. After all, the news media has always been filled with bias of one type or another. In fact, there was a time when American customers of the news knew exactly which newspapers sported which point of view. It was taken for granted that one newspaper supported one side and another newspaper a different side.

But in the late 1950s and early 1960s that all changed. Suddenly the folks in the news media began to present themselves as unbiased pursuers of “the truth.” Gone was the out-in-front bias and instead the media cloaked itself in a new air of detachment, a new just-the-facts mien.

This new era in media conceit coincided with the advent of a liberal mindset that took on the weight of the world, a new era in which liberals felt that their ideals rose above God, tradition and country.

Suddenly a journalist’s work was divorced from the trade in local news and became a profession increasingly assuming a national and ideological agenda, one fueled by journalism schools and professors that began to disgorge university trained “journalists” with a left-wing agenda. These people then went forth to replace the grizzled local reporters that were wedded to their local political culture. This new wave of “journalists” did not want to report what was going on in their local news as much as they wanted to “save the world.”

In pursuit of that left-wing national agenda — if not a leftist world agenda — “reporters” began to spin all news stories, from the most mundane stories to the hottest national news, toward a left-wing agenda. These “journalists” slipped in bias in every way they could to push the leftist’s meme.

For decades this left-wing agenda drove the coverage of the news. Then in the 1980s talk radio came and conservative talkers began to point out this obvious bias. Even so the bias continued unabated.

Only one thing has begun to turn the tide — or at least succeed in educating news consumers — against liberal media bias. Since the advent of the New Media, Internet forums, blogs, podcasts, and on-line news sources, what I call the Old Media has had a much tougher time getting away with the bias that has plagued its work since the 1960s.

But that won’t stop them from trying!

Certainly any list will be somewhat subjective, and some may quibble with what is and is not on the list. But following is, if not the top 50 examples of media bias, 50 egregious and well-known examples of it.

So, without further ado, and in no particular order except a loose historical timeline, here are some of the top 50 examples of liberal media bias.

1) Better Red Than Informed: Probably the single worst example of liberal media bias is the media’s steadfast refusal to accurately report the monstrous evils of the Soviet Union — even still to this day. It didn’t matter how many millions of Soviet citizens that Joseph Stalin and his successors murdered, it didn’t matter how evil the Soviet Union was, the liberal media was not going to report about it. The media even awarded itself a Pulitzer Prize through the lies of one Walter Duranty a New York Times columnist that was a shill for the murderous Soviet Union.

2). Castro’s Cheerleaders: The Soviets weren’t the only communists that America’s liberal media establishment has for years worked to shore up. Cuba’s Fidel Castro was also a communist dear to the hearts of the Old Media establishment. Never an unkind word for dear leader.

Continue reading

Constitutional experts call Obama’s abuse of power historic

“He did not call for legal action against the president of the sort that some legislators took when Obama took military action in Libya without consulting Congress, but let Obama’s record speak for itself as examples of presidential overreach that should not become future presidential habit.”

And therein lies the problem. ANY OTHER PRESIDENT, if they had done the exact same things Obama has done, would have been in the very least impeached long before now, and by this point would likely have been forcibly removed from office and jailed. By comparison, Clinton was impeached for getting a blowjob in the Oval Office and lying about it. Compared to what Obama has done, that’s like executing someone for mispronouncing your name. Don’t get me wrong, Clinton deserved it. But Obama deserves to be removed from office EXPONENTIALLY more so than Clinton.

And yet even the spineless republicans do ABSOLUTELY. NOTHING to address the blatant and far-reaching oversteps of constitutional authority.


http://www.humanevents.com/2012/09/12/constitutional-experts-call-obamas-abuse-of-power-historic/

Constitutional experts call Obama’s abuse of power historic

Constitutional experts call Obama’s abuse of power historic

By: Hope Hodge
9/12/2012 03:15 PM

As president, Barack Obama has made a habit of bypassing or ignoring constitutional limitations on his power, a panel of experts told the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

Obama’s claiming of executive privilege during the Fast and Furious debacle has already faded from the headlines, and it may be hard to remember the weight of the outrage expressed at the beginning of the year, when Obama made a handful of unilateral “recess” appointments, opting to bypass a Senate that wasn’t actually in recess.

But these incidents and a number of others were strung together at the hearing as proof of a dangerous trend in the administration.

“The administration has repeatedly put its partisan agenda above the rule of law,” committee chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) said. “In doing so, it has eroded the constitutional and legal foundation that have kept America prosperous and free for over 200 years.”

Continue reading

Obama Isn’t Anti-Catholic, Christian, or Jew. He’s Anti-BIBLE

With all of the evidence compiled in one place, any shadow of a doubt has been removed.  The evidence is overwhelming.

Obama is NOT a Christian, and is indeed attacking and seeking to destroy all Biblical faiths in the US, if not the world.

If he ever had a saving relationship with Jesus Christ, he left that behind like the Millennium Falcon making the jump to light speed while escaping the Death Star.

Mr. Obama, you may not want it to be true, but we ARE and always have been a Judeo-Christian nation.

Whether we remain such remains to be seen.  If Christians don’t get on their knees and fight like men (of faith), we will not, and will become just another nation on the ash heap of history.
+



http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=106938

America’s Most Biblically-Hostile U. S. President

David Barton

When one observes President Obama’s unwillingness to accommodate America’s four-century long religious conscience protection through his attempts to require Catholics to go against their own doctrines and beliefs, one is tempted to say that he is anti-Catholic. But that characterization would not be correct. Although he has recently singled out Catholics, he has equally targeted traditional Protestant beliefs over the past four years. So since he has attacked Catholics and Protestants, one is tempted to say that he is anti-Christian. But that, too, would be inaccurate. He has been equally disrespectful in his appalling treatment of religious Jews in general and Israel in particular. So perhaps the most accurate description of his antipathy toward Catholics, Protestants, religious Jews, and the Jewish nation would be to characterize him as anti-Biblical. And then when his hostility toward Biblical people of faith is contrasted with his preferential treatment of Muslims and Muslim nations, it further strengthens the accuracy of the anti-Biblical descriptor. In fact, there have been numerous clearly documented times when his pro-Islam positions have been the cause of his anti-Biblical actions.

Listed below in chronological order are (1) numerous records of his attacks on Biblical persons or organizations; (2) examples of the hostility toward Biblical faith that have become evident in the past three years in the Obama-led military; (3) a listing of his open attacks on Biblical values; and finally (4) a listing of numerous incidents of his preferential deference for Islam’s activities and positions, including letting his Islamic advisors guide and influence his hostility toward people of Biblical faith.

1. Acts of hostility toward people of Biblical faith:

  • April 2008 – Obama speaks disrespectfully of Christians, saying they “cling to guns or religion” and have an “antipathy to people who aren’t like them.” 1
  • February 2009 – Obama announces plans to revoke conscience protection for health workers who refuse to participate in medical activities that go against their beliefs, and fully implements the plan in February 2011. 2
  • Continue reading
%d bloggers like this: