• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    December 2018
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov    
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    wearenegroes on Will Hillary Clinton Run Again…
    Al Dajjal (@AlDajjal… on Where are the “Moderate…
    IB on Why Gun Ownership is Biblical…
    NEW White House Insi… on Hitler and the muslim bro…
    who to write an Essa… on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
  • Archives

  • Advertisements

Tim Kaine promises bill to legalize illegal immigrants in ‘first 100 days’

The democrats have thrown down the gauntlet.  This is it.  This is where you must choose.  Do you side with American citizens, or with illegal aliens?  Do you stand for the rule of law, or the rule of men seeking their own benefit?  Do you support our Constitution as the rule of law, or the rule of dictators and oligarchs? 

Tim Kaine and Hillary Clinton have made it quite clear that they stand with the law breaking illegal alien before they stand with the American citizen.  We all know what Hillary Clinton thinks about the rule of law.  And Barack Obama made it clear what democrats think about the US Constitution. Kaine also states another bitter truth in that Paul Ryan will without a doubt cave in to the democrats, as he always has in the past.

If Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine (Kaine and Unable) win, or more likely steal the election in November, there is nothing else left to hold the union together.  The Constitution is the contract that binds the country together, and the democrats have shredded it.  Conservative states must secede as the last chance to avoid an all out revolution.  Then it will be up to the blue states and the democrat tyrants to decide whether there is a war or not.


Tim Kaine promises bill to legalize illegal immigrants in ‘first 100 days’

Vice presidental nominee Sen. Tim Kaine predicted that House Republicans, who stopped President Obama's last bid for legalization in 2013, will reverse themselves next year and said House Speaker Paul D. Ryan will lead the GOP to embrace legalization. (Associated Press)

– The Washington Times – Monday, July 25, 2016

PHILADELPHIA — A new Clinton administration would pursue a bill to legalize illegal immigrants in “the first 100 days” of her tenure, vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine told Spanish-language network Telemundo in an interview Monday, presenting a deep contrast with Republicans. Continue reading


Secession: A RIGHT of the People

This article was from 2012 when many Oklahomans and others began seriously considering secession. The so-called “experts” all poo-pooed the idea saying it couldn’t be done. Here are a few examples.

“It’s ridiculous, the states cannot secede. We saw that in 1865. Six hundred something thousand men lost their lives to prove that the union is indissoluble. It can’t be done,” Historian Bob Shalhope said.

“It has got to be the federal government or congress saying it’s okay, agreeing to it, but you know that is slim to none,” Political Scientist Michael Hirlinger said.

“It’s empty talk and rhetoric, nothing is going to come of it. It lets them blow off their emotions and blow off steam,” Shalhope said.

“The power of secession is not a power reserved to the state. It’s not worth discussing,” Shalhope said.

That last one is pretty rich. This pompous ass blows off the anger rising in America against the federal government by saying that secession isn’t a power reserved to the states. Hmmmm. This idiot doesn’t seem to realize that all the things the federal government is doing that we are pissed about are NOT powers reserved to the FEDERAL government.

So, let me get this straight. Just because secession isn’t written into the Constitution, when the federal government becomes tyrannical and exceeds its authority, we’re supposed to just sit back and take it?


Perhaps you remember when a group of colonies were being oppressed by a tyrannical king. Did the colonies have the power delegated by King George to secede? Nope. But they RIGHTLY did it anyway. Perhaps I should remind these simpletons of the words penned by our founding fathers in our Declaration of Independence.

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

The Constitution is a CONTRACT between the states and the federal government. The government has violated the terms of that contract, thus rendering that contract null and void. We have EVERY RIGHT to secede, and on our current path it is not only our right, but our duty if we want to preserve any shred of our liberty for ourselves and our children.

Link to article:  http://www.news9.com/story/20090233/okc-historian-police-scientist-its-impossible-for-oklahoma-to-secede-from-union

Independence Day -Another One Is Coming

Independence Day - Getting Ready

The GOP Has Surrendered to a Tyrant. Governors MUST Act

31 Republican States SECEDE

Republican governors, are you paying attention? Who is going to pay for this executive amnesty? WE ARE.  Our already cash-strapped states and communities will be forced to foot the bill for benefits for millions of newly “legalized” illegal aliens. The progressive establishment leadership of the GOP in Washington DC is planning to do NOTHING to put a stop to this. I’m afraid that we can wait no longer for anyone in Washington DC to do the right thing. If you all band together, we can stop all of this mess with one proclamation. Red states, band together and SECEDE. The progressive states could do little or nothing to stop it, and could not survive without us. Once they realize they will die on the vine without us, we can reunite the republic on OUR terms. What other choices do we have left? All three branches of the federal government are off the constitutional reservation, and the military has been castrated and appears unwilling to honor their oath to protect and defend the Constitution. If the goal is the restoration of the republic, the rule of law, and the Constitution, then it would seem the only alternatives left are a chaotic and bloody civil war, or secession. I believe a mass secession has the best chance of succeeding.

ATF Violates Restraining Order, Raids Ares Armor

Here is how Holder, Obama, and the communist progressives are going to get around gun registration schemes. They will just seize the customer lists from gun manufacturers, and gun accessory businesses, and then they will track down those customers and start grabbing guns.

Lock and load, citizens. They are coming.

ATF Violates Restraining Order, Raids Ares Armor

Posted by / March 16, 2014


In what can only be described as a lawless act of a rogue government, the ATF yesterday violated the temporary restraining order against raiding Ares Armor in Oceanside, California. According to the Calguns Foundation, they raided “multiple properties” and seized the customer lists for both Ares Armor and EP Lowers.

The restraining order was to be in effect until a court hearing on March 20, 2014 if the parties could not reach an agreement. Apparently the federal government believes it can do anything it wants to do. But somewhere, a judge signed search warrants for the ATF and those warrants were executed yesterday.

Ares Armor owns two stores and a manufacturing operation called EP lowers. Besides being pro-gun, the main point of contention between Ares Armor and the ATF has been the 80% lowers (made of polymer) that are not considered a firearm. Yet ATF agents have attempted intimidation on the owner, Dimitri Kassas, a USMC combat veteran, and demanded not just the lowers in their inventory, but their customer lists as well.

The business turned over their stock of lowers, even though the ATF claim was based upon an erroneous information, and Dimitri and his attorney were working hard to get it corrected. But the ATF wasn’t really concerned about the plastic gun parts…they wanted the customer lists and they didn’t care how they got them.

Dimitri had strongly stated that he did not want to turn over those lists based on privacy concerns.The feds had other plans. The business stated that they were still open, even though they were having to use hand calculators and had no computers.


Obama Power Grab: Serves 14-State Governors With Warnings of Arrest

This needs to spread like wildfire. This is just one of many potential trip wires for kicking off a revolution. If the federal government retreats to the Constitutional reservation on which it is supposed to exist, it has nothing to worry about from the states. But if they keep pushing, all bets are off.

Obama has some pretty big balls to accuse these governors of treason.  It is Obama who has and is WILLFULLY disregarding his constitutional duty.  He REFUSES to secure our borders.  He instructs his DoJ to willfully disobey current laws that he doesn’t like.  He himself disobeys laws (War Powers Act among others).  With the aid of democrats in the house and senate, he passes laws that are blatantly unconstitutional.  If he can’t get the law he wants passed, he just gets his executive agencies to legislate via regulation, thus circumventing congress.

And he has the gall to accuse ANYBODY else of treason?  Keep blustering, peckerhead.  Start trying to arrest governors for this, and the s#$^’s gonna get real.


1.  Forgot to provide the link to the original article (http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/05/obama-serves-14-state-governors-with-warnings-of-arrest-and-why-is-this-not-front-page-news-2636456.html)

2.  The day after the original article was posted, they posted another article that said “An unconfirmed report states that President Obama has “served 14-State Governors in the United States, National Security Letters (NSLs)” (http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/05/state-defense-forces-governors-form-militia-protection-against-martial-law-2641174.html)

3.  There are a number of states with State Defense Forces (http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/02/why-more-states-should-establish-state-defense-forces)

4.  If you want more information on the various State Defense Forces, why not contact them?  CNN’s Clark Howard posted an article on how to do just that (http://www.clarkhoward.com/news/clark-howard/employment-military/state-defense-force-sign/nFZ8/)

5.  The NSL claim in the original article is unverified.  Snopes says not, but Snopes has proven to be the National Enquirer of the internet.  As Beforeitsnews corrected, the claims are “unconfirmed.”  With the current events in Washington (IRS, AP, Benghazi, DoJ, etc), you’re not likely to here about this again soon.  But in light of what we have learned about Obama administration tactics from just those scandals, and other threats and coercion by the DoJ in reference to gun control, you decide whether or not this is at least plausible.

Obama Serves 14-State Governors With Warnings of Arrest: And why is this not front page news?

Tuesday, May 7, 2013 11:57
by Ken Larive

Barack Hussein Obama had served 14-State Governors in the United States, National Security Letters (NSLs) warning that the Governor’s actions in attempting to form “State Defense Forces” needs to be halted “immediately” or they will face arrest for the crime of treason. The employment of NSLs was authorized by the Patriot Act introduced by George W. Bush. Contained within the section related to these letters, it is forbidden for anyone receiving a NSL warning to even acknowledge the existence of said communication.

Obama is angered by the several State Governors who have reestablished “State Defense Forces.” These forces are described as: “State Defense Forces (also known as State Guards, State Military Reserves, State Militias) in the United States are military units that operate under the sole authority of a state government; they are not regulated by the National Guard Bureau nor are they part of the Army National Guard of the United States. State Defense Forces are authorized by state and federal law and are under the command of the governor of each state. State Defense Forces are distinct from their state’s National Guard in that they cannot become federal entities.

Mr. Obama is fearful of these State Defense Forces, in that he does not have control of said forces, and with the U.S. Military stretched to near breaking from multiple deployments and theatre actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, these State military forces would be under the direct command and authority of the Governors in which states have said forces. In essence, the Governors would have “de facto control” of the United States.

The two Governors leading this move are: Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota; and Rick Perry, Governor of Texas. Both of these State Governors stated they have: “…deep fear the President is destroying their Nation.” Governor Pawlenty’s fear of Obama is that since Obama took office he has appeased America’s enemies and has shunned some of America’s strongest allies, especially Israel. Governor Perry has declared that Obama is punishing his State of Texas by dumping tens-of-thousands of illegal Mexican immigrants into the cities and small towns of Texas. Governor Perry further recently stated: “If Barack Obama’s Washington doesn’t stop being so oppressive, Texans might feel compelled to renounce their American citizenry and secede from the union.” (Yeeeeessss!!)

Obama fearing a revolution against him by the states, has moved swiftly by nationalizing nearly all National Guard Forces in multiple states; Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, Minnesota, Tennessee, Virginia, Louisiana, South Carolina – to name a few. The Governors of the Great States of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia still have under their Command-and-Control the State Defense Forces to go against U.S. Federal forces should the need arise. Also important to note: There are NO U.S. laws prohibiting National Guard troops from also joining their State’s Defense Forces. This dilemma occurred during the Civil War with many “citizen soldiers” choosing to serve their states instead of the Federal Government.

This is a fluid and still developing situation that warrants close attention.

Holder and the DoJ Declare War on the States

Update (02 May 13, 2205):

Kansas replies to Eric Withholder:

Page 1 of 2 of Kansas' AG's reply to a despotic DoJ

Page 1 of 2 of Kansas’ AG’s reply to a despotic DoJ

Holder v Kansas reply 2-2

Page 2 of 2 of Kansas’ AG’s reply to a despotic DoJ


Here’s your warning order, America.  The tyrants are marshaling their forces. 

Holder takes the position that all tyrants do – that everything they do is authorized, anything to the contrary – worthless.  But Holder is wrong.  The Supremacy Clause doesn’t say that “any law in conflict with federal law” is void.  It says that only those laws “in pursuance” of the constitution are supreme.

If you’re not prepared to defend our Constitution and what’s left of your liberties, you don’t deserve to call yourself an American.  There is a war coming, and it’s NOT of our choosing or making.  The tyrannical government of Barack Obama WILL try to take your guns and enslave you.  You can choose to go down fighting, or you can be a slave.  Which will you choose?

Eric Holder Threatens Kansas in Letter on Gun Control Nullification Law

Posted by

On Thursday, Kansas Governor Sam Brownback received a letter from Federal Attorney General Eric Holder threatening action against the state should it enforce SB102 which Brownback signed into law last month.

The new law states, in part:

Any act, law, treaty, order, rule or regulation of the government of the United States which violates the second amendment to the constitution of the United States is null, void and unenforceable in the state of Kansas

The bill also provides for criminal penalties against federal agents who attempt to enforce specific federal laws on guns manufactured in the state of Kansas and sold within the state – as the state takes the position under the new law that the federal government does not “interstate commerce” authority over such items.

In his letter, Holder didn’t take too kindly to such a proposition.  He wrote:

“In purporting to override federal law and to criminalize the official acts of federal officers, SB102 directly conflicts with federal law and is therefore unconstitutional.”  

He continued, “Under the Supremacy Clause…Kansas may not prevent federal employees and officials from carrying out their official responsibilities.  And a state certainly may not criminalize the exercise of federal responsibilities.  Because SB102 conflicts with federal firearms laws and regulations, federal law supercedes this new statute; all provisions of federal laws and their implementing regulations therefore continue to apply.”

Let’s take Eric apart here. Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: