Racist Professor Asks “Can My Children Be Friends With White People?”

Where does one even begin with this level of absurdity?  This so-called professor of law posits the question “Can My Children Be Friends With White People?”, and unequivocally answers with “NO.”  He uses lots of broad brush arguments with no basis in fact that I would assume he KNOWS would never hold up in court, and would be immediately thrown out as hearsay and slander.  He is a “law” professor, right?  Let’s look at some of the more egregious examples of his projectionism and hypocrisy.

“Donald Trump’s election has made it clear that I will teach my boys the lesson generations old, one that I for the most part nearly escaped.”

As you do later in your diatribe, you are associating Donald Trump and his supporters with racism against blacks, yet you provide not one scintilla of evidence that Donald Trump is or has done anything racist against blacks.  I guess the approximately 8% of the black community who voted for Trump aren’t black enough for you?  Perhaps they are “Uncle Toms?”

“The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous dream of black and white children holding hands was a dream precisely because he realized that in Alabama, conditions of dominance made real friendship between white and black people impossible.”

Mr. Yankah is accusing an entire race of being racist, but in doing so is showing himself to be the bigoted racist.  There are SOME white people who are racist, just as there are SOME black people who are racist.  Mr. Yankah, why aren’t you embracing the words of the man whose coattails you hide behind by judging INDIVIDUALS by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin?  Hypocrite.

“History has provided little reason for people of color to trust white people in this way, and these recent months have put in the starkest relief the contempt with which the country measures the value of racial minorities.”

No reason to trust whites?  While blacks were at one time enslaved by whites (AND by blacks, AND by arab muslims), you were also freed by WHITES.  You were given the right to vote by WHITES.  The Civil Rights Act was passed by, you guessed it, WHITES.  The VAST majority of welfare dollars going to the black community is also be collected overwhelmingly from… wait for it… WHITES.  Sir, if you couldn’t trust whites, you would still be in chains working in cotton fields.  If you can read this, thank a WHITE Republican.

“America is transfixed on the opioid epidemic among white Americans (who often get hooked after being overprescribed painkillers — while studies show that doctors underprescribe pain medication for African-Americans). But when black lives were struck by addiction, we cordoned off minority communities with the police and threw away an entire generation of black and Hispanic men.”

Notice what the disingenuous “professor” of law does here.  He does the bait and switch.  He tries to equate the opioid problem in the white community with the illicit trade and addiction problems of crack, heroin, and meth in the black community.  Both are horrible, but they are NOT the same thing.  One who is prescribed opioids by a doctor is generally taking them for pain associated with a medical procedure, at least initially.  Those who take and become addicted to crack, meth, and/or heroine do it by CHOICE from the beginning.

“I will teach my boys to have profound doubts that friendship with white people is possible.”

You, sir, are a flaming racist, projecting your own faults onto people whom you have never met, and do not know.  You are making a sweeping generalization that is PURELY based on race while pointing the finger of racism at others.  Hypocrite.

“Only white people can cordon off Mr. Trump’s political meaning, ignore the “unpleasantness” from a position of safety.”

EXCUSE ME????  WHO has been more in danger since Trump was elected, and just as much during Barack Obama’s presidency???  You can’t continue the bullcrap lie that blacks are being targeted by white cops, or are being murdered by whites at some abnormally high rate.  The ACTUAL crime statistics prove that to be entirely false.  The ACTUAL crime statistics prove that blacks are MANY times more likely to be murdered by a BLACK person than by a white person.  They also prove that a white person is more likely to be killed by a black person than a white person.  But let’s go back to the “fear” thing.  Are their roving bands of whites roaming the inner cities LITERALLY hunting black people?  No.  There ARE mobs of blacks beating up whites.  How about things like the “knockout” “game?” Most perpetrators have been black attacking whites.  If there is ANY group that should be afraid of another based on the evidence, it is whites who should be “suspicious” of blacks.  But I don’t advocate the broad brush racism that you do.  I advocate a situational suspicion instead of a race-based suspicion.  If an angry mob of ANY color of people is moving toward you, you don’t wait around to see if they want to be friends.  If someone is pointing a gun at you, it doesn’t matter what skin color they are.  If someone is passing laws that are detrimental to your freedom and liberty, it doesn’t matter what their skin color happens to be, right?

“So, too, is his history of housing discrimination,…”

Again, you offer ZERO proof of your allegations.  Just like the rest of the Alinsky-left, you are just slinging mud to see what sticks.  You are repeating progressive media talking points with no citation, or research of your own.  You’re supposed to be a freaking LAW professor.  You of all people should know you don’t build a case on hearsay.

“…his casual conflation of Muslims with terrorists,…”

See above.  He has NEVER said that all muslims are terrorists.  He has POINTED OUT that many of the terrorist attacks in this country have been committed by MUSLIMS, most of whom were IMMIGRANTS or “REFUGEES” who were NEVER PROPERLY VETTED.  Donald Trump has been attempting to put in place travel and immigration restrictions on the VERY SAME countries that BARACK OBAMA did.  So, are you going to be intellectually honest and call Barack Obama an islamophobe and racist now?  No, you’re too much of an intellectually weak coward to be that even handed.

“…his reducing Mexican-Americans to murderers and rapists.”

TRUMP. NEVER. SAID. THIS.  You are quoting a viral MISQUOTATION of Donald Trump when he said that there are SOME bad people, rapists and murderers, coming across our border.  And he is FACTUALLY, 100% CORRECT to say so.  Does MS-13 ring a bell?  Do you read the news AT ALL?  There are dozens of stories every week of illegal aliens killing Americans, stealing identities, and all sorts of other crimes, ON TOP OF THEIR ORIGINAL CRIME OF COMING HERE ILLEGALLY.  Oh, and you refer to a group of “Mexican-Americans.”  I say you’re either American, or you’re whatever nationality the country you came from calls its citizens.  If you become an American citizen, there can be no dual loyalty.  One cannot serve two masters.  There can be no hyphens.

“They bristle at the accusation that they supported racism, insisting they had to ignore Mr. Trump’s ugliness.”

So, if I as a white American say that I do not support or condone racism in any way, I am to be dismissed and labeled a racist despite the COMPLETE LACK OF EVIDENCE that would back any assertion of racism, but if YOU say you’re not a racist, despite an entire article of evidence which the New York Times has published for you, we’re supposed to just believe you?  Again, Mr. Morally Superior Black Man, I point you back to the message of MLK, Jr. which you hide behind and PRETEND to embrace.  He would disavow you in a heartbeat, you noisy cymbal and clanging gong.

“They protest: Have they ever said anything racist? Don’t they shovel the sidewalk of the new black neighbors? Surely, they say, politics — a single vote — does not mean we can’t be friends.”

Yes, you jackwagon.  That’s EXACTLY what we say, and BELIEVE.  I don’t care if my neighbor is black, white, latino, oriental, Indian, Native American, etc.  I care that my neighbor ISN’T AN A**HOLE.

“My bi-ethnic wife, my most trusted friend, understands she is seen as a white woman, even though her brother and father are not. Among my dearest friends, the wedding party and children’s godparents variety, many are white.”

Funny how if a white person points out that they have black friends, or even a black spouse, people like YOU immediately say they have a “token black” friend to “hide their racism.”  Do you see the irony here?

As a self-respecting PERSON, I would be ashamed to pen my name to such an ignorant, racist piece of drivel as this NYT article by Mr. Ekow N. Yankah. However, the left has no shame, and doesn’t seem to have a problem exposing their own ignorance, racism, hatred, and hypocrisy. In fact, they seem to be wearing them as badges of “honor.”

Link to article:  https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/11/opinion/sunday/interracial-friendship-donald-trump.html

Advertisements

The Hydra of Islam

Just cutting off the heads will NEVER be enough. For each one we cut off, two more grow in its place, just like the mythical hydra.

We will likely never be completely free of the terrorism and savagery that comes from islam, but if we ban it from OUR country, and expel all of its adherents, they will have a much harder time attacking us from within.

Islamic Hydra

Mitch McConnell Trying to Give MORE Power to Obama, Ability to Delcare International Martial Law

Progressive RINOs Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, and others are once again seeking to give away even more of congress’s constitutional power to the office of the president, read as Barack Obama.  As hard as they keep trying to do this, one could easily be forgiven for believing these progressive RINOs and their democrat friends want a monarchy in this country.  Or a dictatorship…

+



Link to article:  http://tothedeathmedia.com/breaking-senator-desperately-warns-america-obama-is-changing-consitution-to-declare/

**RED ALERT** SENATOR DESPERATELY WARNS AMERICA OBAMA IS CHANGING CONSITUTION TO DECLARE INTERNATIONAL MARTIAL LAW

A new bill making its way through Congress contains “dangerous and unprecedented” language that could be considered a “declaration of international martial law,” a US senator warned last Thursday.

“This resolution is a total rewrite of the War Powers clause of the Constitution. Let’s be clear about that,” Democrat Senator Chris Murphy said on the Senate floor last week in regards to S.J. Res. 29, a bill purporting to give the sitting US president the power to declare war on ISIS.
“It is essentially a declaration of international martial law,” Murphy said. Continue reading

Someone Drew a Cartoon of You? You Poor BABY!

The religion of Evil can’t seem to contain their extreme butt-hurt over someone drawing a simple cartoon.  Take your butt-hurt and go live in a country that shares your level of evil.  You just further prove how evil you are, and how incompatible your so-called religion is with the rest of the world with every one of your animalistic temper tantrums.  The first crusades were a response to muslim barbarism and conquest.  We are rapidly building momentum for Crusade 2.0, and this time it will be worldwide.

img-307213858-0001_zps0wbux1qx Je-Suis-Charlie-color-1_zpsaamxy8ck Mohammad-contest-piece-4-small-1_zpsr4tzeyvq motoon.paul_.green-1_zpsx6pjooow movolution-The-Muslim-Issue-1_zpsfimhcrbq Muhamad-copy_zpsnic8t63v Muhammad-Monroe-Final-1_zpsstf6ymt8 Muhammad-Say_zpsfsipoxmf Portrait-1_zpsucpywoij Religion-of-Peace150-jpeg_zpsigfnbedg Screen-Shot-2015-05-07-at-11.05.33-AM Stephen-Graves_zpswectb5d0That's why I draw you

Dem. Rep Gutierrez Threatens Immigrant Violence if Amnesty Not Passed

Arrest the Marxist-progressive prick Gutierrez for inciting violence.  His threats amount to terrorism.  These tactics are the same ones you see from the communist-controlled labor unions.  We’re not going to be intimidated by cowardly little pricks like Gutierrez who will never do the dirty work themselves, but will simply incite others to do it for them.  Just like terrorists, and just like communists.

If ILLEGAL ALIENS and their supporters want to get violent because we aren’t rewarding them for BREAKING THE LAW, then we will no longer have a reason NOT to shoot them. A 35¢ bullet is cheaper than all the taxpayer funded goodies we’re giving them, or even a bus ticket back to the border. So, if they CHOOSE to give us a reason to shoot you, it will be a bargain for us.



Dem. Rep Gutierrez Warns of Unprecedented Immigrant “Militancy” After Judge Orders Obama to Stop Amnesty In Texas

19 Feb, 2015 by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

So, nudge becomes push becomes shove, huh? Careful sir, who you threaten… you may think that you can have a sitting President trash and ignore the Constitution, but we still have a few sane judges here in America. We’re not full-blown communist yet, much to your displeasure, I’m sure. If there is militancy, Americans will kick said militants’ butts all the way back across the border. Mexico doesn’t own us… Obama doesn’t rule us… and you don’t scare us.

From Weasel Zippers:

A not-so-thinly veiled threat of violence. Continue reading

They ALL Read the SAME Book. Allah IS Satan, Video Explains

Yet ANOTHER moslem terror attack overnight.  This time in Denmark.  The cancer of islam is spreading rapidly.

The response of liberal-progressives and RINOs without a spine will be the usual.

“Lone wolf…”  “Radical moslem…”  “Don’t label ALL moslems…”  etc.

Rather than condemning the attacks, the response from moslems will also be predictable.

“Woe is us…”  “Racism…”  “We’re so picked on…”

Bullcrap.  They are using civilization against civilization, and lying to buy themselves the time needed to gain sufficient strength to conquer us.  They have done this throughout history, if you care to look it up.

There is no such thing as a “moderate” moslem.  The cancer is NOT “radical” islam, or a “perversion” of islam.  The cancer is islam itself.  You must define your terms when arguing this to the idiot left.  A “good” moslem to US is one who doesn’t kill people.  A “good” moslem to a moslem is one who follows the koran.  The koran tells moslems to kill infidels (i.e. you and me) wherever they find them.  A “bad” moslem to a moslem is one who doesn’t believe the koran as written, or who leaves the faith (apostate).  As I heard it said the other day…

“A radical moslem will cut off your head while the “moderate” moslem holds your ankles.”

MAKE NO MISTAKE.  The ideology that we MUST defeat is not “radical” islam, but islam itself.  ALL of it.  We must ban it from our civilized societies because it has demonstrated since it was invented by the murdering pedophile Mohammed that islam CAN’T and WON’T coexist with any other ideology.

I often quote Sir Karl Popper’s paradox of tolerance, and will do so again because it explains so well the paradox that a tolerant civilization MUST confront if it wishes to survive the onslaught of the intolerant.

Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.
–Sir Karl Popper, From The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton 1971

I will leave you with a video from Alfonso Rachel that explains all this very well.  We must eradicate islam from our midst, or we will not survive.  It is literally US or THEM.  I choose US.

Allah IS Satan, and HERE is the proof.

ISIS Leader to USA: ‘Soon We Will be in Direct Confrontation’

It’s time to arrest and jail the muslim-in-chief, round up the rest of his Marxist-Alinskyite buddies, and start playing cowboys and muslims. Is-lame is incompatible with civilization, especially ours, and Obama is doing everything he can to surrender America to it. You CAN’T tolerate an ideology within your borders that has sworn to subjugate and kill you. Thus we are left with two choices. Expel them from our borders and let the rest of the world deal with them, or combat them like the mortal enemy that they are. Us or them, to the death. I choose US. But we MUST acknowledge that the ideology of islam IS our enemy.
+


+

ISIS Leader to USA: ‘Soon We Will be in Direct Confrontation’

June 13, 2014 – 11:54 AM
Abu Bakr al Baghdadi

Abu Bakr al Baghdadi (Photo/Iraqi Ministry of Interior)

(CNSNews.com) – Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), issued a rare audio message back on January 21 in which he flatly stated his group’s intention to march on Baghdad and move into “direct confrontation” with the United States.

“Our last message is to the Americans. Soon we will be in direct confrontation, and the sons of Islam have prepared for such a day,” Baghdadi said. “So watch, for we are with you, watching.” Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: