• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    February 2019
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan    
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    texan2driver on RINO Meghan McCain Shoots Off…
    jonolan on RINO Meghan McCain Shoots Off…
    texan2driver on Mueller Team Scrubbed Peter St…
    PrayThroughHistory on Mueller Team Scrubbed Peter St…
    wearenegroes on Will Hillary Clinton Run Again…
  • Archives

  • Advertisements


“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”
-Frédéric Bastiat



New York-Values Nadler: ‘We Mean Business’ on Gun Control; ‘It’s Not About Mental Health’

At least Comrade Nadler is honest about the democrat push for gun not being about mental health.

It’s about disarmament so you can’t resist when they tell you to give up what is yours and get on the train.

See embedded commentary below in this font color.

Nadler: ‘We Mean Business’ on Gun Control; ‘It’s Not About Mental Health’

By Susan Jones | February 7, 2019 | 7:40 AM EST

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and ranking member Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) talk before a hearing on gun violence legislation on Capitol Hill, February 6, 2019. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) – “We came in, and we mean business,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, told CNN’s Chris Cuomo Wednesday night.

And one major item of Democrat business is gun control:

I believe there are legislative fixes,” Nadler said. “And you need the political will to pass it, and I think the American — after eight years of the Republicans doing nothing and mass murder after — mass shooting after mass shooting — I think the politics of this country has changed. I think the election results last year showed that.

We will pass — I would venture to predict that we will pass possibly into law this year universal background checks, maybe the Charleston loophole, and we will develop the political pressure to pass assault weapons bans and other things in the next few years.  (They will develop it through the usual means by lying, exploiting tragedy, and creating false-flag events to sway an increasingly ignorant populace)

Nadler dismissed concerns that mentally ill people are the ones, by and large, pulling the trigger in mass shootings:

Well, it’s not about mental health. (As stated above, it’s about disarming you so you can’t resist when they confiscate your stuff and tell you to get on the train) There are — other countries do not exceed several hundred gun violence deaths a year.  (He, like other leftists, neglects to mention that there are SEVERAL nations that have more gun violence deaths than us.  They are 3rd world hell-holes.  Of the industrialized nations, none of them have the raw numbers of deaths we do, but they also have a fraction of the population we do.  They have as many as we do, and have much less freedom, and no ability to defend themselves against people who don’t obey their idiotic laws, like muslim invaders… uh… immigrants) We have 35 to 40,000. It’s a slander on the American people to say that our people are so much more mentally ill than people in Europe or Canada or Switzerland.

Yes, we should deal with mental health, but the real issue is, when you control the number of guns available to people who shouldn’t have them, (in his eyes, and the eyes of the left, NONE of us should have guns because they are the only thing between them and absolute power) you reduce gun violence, as was proven in Australia, as we know from various states in the united States, and they (Republicans) don’t want to — they don’t want to recognize this.  (Lies and omissions.  Statistically, EVERYWHERE that it has been made easier for LAW ABIDING citizens to own and carry firearms, violent crime has gone DOWN.  In EVERY city with the strictest gun laws in the country, violence is out of control.  And all of those places are run by democrats)

(It should be noted that Australia, in 1996, banned semi-automatic and self-loading rifles and shotguns and passed severe restrictions on gun ownership in general, requiring would-be gun owners to show a “genuine reason,” other than self-defense. Australia also launched a nationwide buyback program for prohibited weapons, among other measures to keep guns away from its citizens.)  (And following that, their violent crime rate EXPLODED.  The gun ban in Washington DC in the 70’s had the same effect)

Nadler’s committee held a hearing Wednesday on “gun violence prevention,” which included emotional testimony, (KEY WORD:  EMOTIONAL.  Leftists don’t want you to think.  They want you to FEEL.  What little thought they want you to engage in, they want to be based on their lies instead of actual facts) mostly from young people who survived school shootings, including the one in Parkland, Fla.

Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), a gunshot survivor, is a Second Amendment supporter.

On Wednesday night, Scalise told Fox News’s Laura Ingraham that Democrats on the Judiciary Committee denied his request to testify about his own experience of being shot and almost killed at a congressional baseball practice.  (Democrats don’t want you to hear anything that contradicts their agenda, and will do ANYTHING to prevent you from hearing it.  If you do hear contradictory information, they will lie about it, ignore it, spin it)

I mean, historically, when Republicans were in charge, even when Democrats were in charge prior to this more radical leftist majority, if a member of Congress wanted to testify on a committee, they always provided a venue for that to happen. And in this case, they were having a hearing in the Judiciary (Committee) on reducing gun violence.

And I’ve got a perspective, clearly mine dealt with something that happened to me, and I saw how guns were used to save people’s lives. And it should have been able to be part of the testimony. They wanted to focus on taking away the rights of law-abiding citizens, which their bill ultimately does.

(Committee staff told Fox News that Scalise’s written testimony would be entered into the record.)

“They think they can silence conservative voices, but you know what? They can’t silence conservative voices,” Scalise said.

“Go read their bill, by the way,” Scalise continued. He noted that the Democrat bill would, under certain circumstances, charge gun-owners with felonies for loaning a shotgun to a friend, for example. “Gun control is what they’re trying to get at. They want full gun registration, they want to take away your rights,” Scalise said.

The NRA says “universal background checks” is actually a liberal scheme to achieve a permanent registry of every gun sold in the country, something Democrats have wanted for many years.

Link to articlehttps://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/nadler-we-mean-business-gun-control-its-not-about-mental-health

Two Wolves Deciding Which Sheep is for Dinner

The real question here should be who is going to investigate Adam Schiff-for-brains and Muddy Waters for THEIR corruption and misdeeds?  They have a long history of illegal and unethical activity, but now they are in charge, so they won’t be punished for it.  They will hypocritically be punishing OTHERS for doing things far more insignificant than what they have done.  It’s called “deflection,” and a cover up.


Schiff, Waters plan joint Deutsche Bank investigation


Two powerful House committee chairs are planning a joint investigation into German lending giant Deutsche Bank, which is under scrutiny from Democrats over its business dealings with President Donald Trump.

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff and Financial Services Chairwoman Maxine Waters coordinating oversight of the bank, which also faces questions about its role in money laundering schemes.

The two California Democrats have been talking about areas of interest for each committee and where there’s common ground, Schiff said in an interview.
“We’re going to work jointly,” he said. “We think we’ll be more effective doing it that way.”

The investigation into Deutsche Bank will be one of the most closely watched probes launched by the new Democratic-controlled House because it could provide a glimpse into Trump’s finances and ties abroad.

Waters, who has called for the president’s impeachment, has vowed to follow the “Trump money trail” starting with Deutsche Bank. Before she became chairwoman, she asked the bank for details on its handling of Trump’s accounts and involvement in Russian money laundering schemes.

Read entire article herehttps://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/23/adam-schiff-maxine-waters-deutsche-bank-1108140

Maxine Waters Skates Again And Democrats—Culture Of Corruption Carries On


Culture Of Corruption: A House panel has cleared Rep. Maxine Waters of ethics charges after her office used its clout to bail out her husband’s bank. This is getting tiresome. Just what’s it take to remove a corrupt Democrat?

“Nothing to see here, move along” is what the House Ethics Committee effectively declared after a stalled, subpoena-blocked investigation that took three years came up empty.

But was there really nothing on Waters? The California Democrat was accused of using her position as a member of the House Financial Services Committee in 2009 to steer $12 million in bailout money to the failing Boston-based OneUnited Bank, in which her husband had substantial stakes.

The federal cash had been earmarked for solvent banks with good banking practices, yet OneUnited, which failed all such criteria, got an exemption from the FDIC accounting rules.

Maybe that’s because Treasury Department bank examiners were subject to a barrage of calls from Waters’ grandson, Mikael Moore, muscling into an operation that was supposed to be judged impartially. In the end, the bank got its cash, leaving FDIC investigators fuming about “a travesty of justice,” and Moore is likely to get off with a slap on the wrist at most.

As for Waters, she skates. “This case is also about access,” Waters said, unwittingly indicating that “access” means access to taxpayer cash, for herself.

With the ethics charge gone, Waters won’t slink off in shame, but will now fail upward, poised to assume minority leadership of the Financial Services Committee.

So much for ending the “culture of corruption,” with “the most honest, most open, most ethical Congress in history,” as Rep. Nancy Pelosi pledged on taking up the House Speaker’s gavel in 2006.

But Waters is just the latest example of how impunity has accelerated among Democrats and Congress has become an open trough. The examples are piling up:

• Back in the 1980s, Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts, was caught using his pull to fix his lover’s 33 parking tickets as the latter ran a gay prostitution racket out of Frank’s basement. The penalty? Promotion to the House Financial Services Committee chairmanship.

• House Ways and Means Committee chairman Charles Rangel of New York, who in 2010 was found to be in violation of House rules by shaking down public colleges for funds and evading the taxman. He got a wrist slap and still has his seat.

• Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut got himself a sweetheart “VIP” loan from subprime lender Countrywide to buy himself a palatial “cottage” in Ireland. The consequences for him? None.

• Housing and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius recently violated the Hatch Act by campaigning on the job, yet skated instead of getting fired, which is the prescribed penalty.

• Attorney General Eric Holder was found to be in contempt of Congress for withholding documents on Operation Fast and Furious, yet merited President Obama’s “full confidence” last week.

Any one of these violations would get a Republican fired or forced from office. But when a Democrat self-deals, power becomes its own justification.

Link to articlehttps://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/maxine-waters-beats-corruption-rap-with-impunity/


Collusion ISN’T Between Trump & Russia, But Between Mueller, FBI and CNN

What a coincidence that CNN “just happened” to be there when the FBI showed up for a pre-dawn raid to arrest Roger Stone.  Don’t you think?  I’m sure there is NOOOOOO possibility that any of the all-democrat anti-Trump Mueller team could have tipped off CNN. 

COLLUSION! MUELLER TIPS OFF CNN – Entire Stone Pre-Dawn Raid Captured by Anti-Trump Channel (VIDEO)


To All The Workers Impacted By The Shutdown – Almost Every DEMOCRAT Voted Against Paying You During The Shutdown

Nancy “Botox Bolshevik” Pelosi says she’s eager to “work together in a bipartisan fashion” to end the shutdown because she’s just soooooo worried about those government workers not getting their paychecks.  She says this as she’s trying to leave the country on a taxpayer boondoggle that would prevent her from being around to “work together in a bipartisan fashion” to end the shutdown.  Lying sack of…  Botox.  Her and the democrats ONLY concern is doing ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to damage Donald Trump.


To All The Workers Impacted By The Shutdown – Almost Every DEMOCRAT Voted Against Paying You During The Shutdown

If you needed more proof that Democrats are responsible for the government shutdown this is it.

Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw reported on Twitter that Republicans had a plan to pay federal workers during the shutdown.

But that proposal did not pass because all but 6 Democrats voted against it.


Link to entire article:  https://en-volve.com/2019/01/23/to-all-the-workers-impacted-by-the-shutdown-almost-every-democrat-voted-against-paying-you-during-the-shutdown/


Democrats STILL Seeking Government Takeover of Healthcare, Lying to Sell the Myth of “Free” Healthcare

The democrats are using several LIES to sell this push for government run, a.k.a. “single-payer” healthcare.

They say it will be more affordable. Remember Barack Hussein Obama promising it would cut premiums by $2,500 per year for most families? In actuality, premiums went UP as much as 400% in some cases.

Obama also promised “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.” Yet many doctors would not, and do not accept Obamacare, meaning you had to find a doctor that would.

They say that under Obamacare, millions more got health insurance. They don’t discuss the millions who were KICKED OFF their health insurance, and had to pay much higher premiums to cover the freeloaders. Nor do the tell you that having insurance is not the same as having healthcare, as described above because not all doctors take that insurance.

They say healthcare will be “free.” Someone promising you something for nothing is ALWAYS lying to you. There is no such thing as “free” when it comes to cost. SOMEONE has to pay the price. Everyone WILL pay the price in the form of higher taxes on a whole host of things, fees, etc. They also tell you healthcare is a “right.” A “right,” by definition, does not infringe upon or take away from another person. That means that everyone who supports the idea that “free” healthcare is somehow a “right” also supports legalized theft and slavery because to make it “free” means you would either take the money from someone else to pay for it, or you would require the doctor to treat you without compensation, which is slavery.

Being that “free” healthcare is also a socialist idea (actually closet communist since it always involves more government control), as always, it ignores human nature in forecasting the results. Doctors who aren’t being reimbursed adequately to cover their costs either will not accept that insurance, or if forced to, will eventually just stop practicing medicine, as many have done. That means a shortage of doctors. When something is “free,” people will consume more of it than if their is a cost they must consider vs. spending those dollars on other necessities. That means increased demand for doctors. Increased demand on fewer doctors inevitably leads to longer wait times and inferior care. It has happened EVERYWHERE this has been tried.

If you are a recent product of the public school system, unless your parents had a good head on their shoulders and raised you right, there’s a good chance you believe the drivel you have been indoctrinate with by our liberal/socialist/communist public school system. You have been taught that basically everything the democrats are saying is right and good.

Hear me now, believe me later. Don’t take my word for it. Do UNBIASED research, and apply common sense and human nature to what you find. Educate yourself on what has worked in the past (i.e. NOT socialism and more government control of things), and what is likely to work in the future.

It’s not too late YET, but we’re quickly approaching the point of no return in terms of having enough people smart enough, educated enough, and honest enough to keep America from collapsing into an idiocracy, and just collapsing completely.


Democratic chairman begins prep work for legislation to enact ‘single payer’ healthcare

House Budget Committee Chairman John Yarmuth, D-Ky., has asked the Congressional Budget Office to analyze the effects of shifting all healthcare costs onto the federal government, a first step toward the “Medicare for all” legislation sought by progressives.

“Members of Congress developing proposals seeking to establish a single-payer system will face many important decisions that could have major implications for federal spending, national healthcare spending, and access to care,” Yarmuth said in a letter to Keith Hall, the director of the CBO.


Read entire article here: Democratic chairman begins prep work for legislation to enact ‘single payer’ healthcare

This is NOT the First Time Courts Have Ruled that Police HAVE NO DUTY OR RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT YOU.

There have been several landmark decisions like this that say police have no duty or responsibility to protect you.  Yet the idiotic, tyrannical left says “You don’t need a gun to defend yourself.  Just call the police.”

Tell me, libtards.  If the leftist judges whom YOU appointed say that the police YOU say I’m supposed to depend on for my self-defense don’t have to defend me, how do I defend myself?

***THIS*** is why you must literally fight to the death for your right to keep and bear arms.


Judge issues a stunning ruling in lawsuit against police and school officials by Parkland victims

A federal judge issued the stunning decision that police and school officials had no responsibility to shield the children entrusted to their care when they were attacked at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School.

Read entire article hereJudge issues a stunning ruling in lawsuit against police and school officials by Parkland victims

%d bloggers like this: