Obama Power Grab: Serves 14-State Governors With Warnings of Arrest

This needs to spread like wildfire. This is just one of many potential trip wires for kicking off a revolution. If the federal government retreats to the Constitutional reservation on which it is supposed to exist, it has nothing to worry about from the states. But if they keep pushing, all bets are off.

Obama has some pretty big balls to accuse these governors of treason.  It is Obama who has and is WILLFULLY disregarding his constitutional duty.  He REFUSES to secure our borders.  He instructs his DoJ to willfully disobey current laws that he doesn’t like.  He himself disobeys laws (War Powers Act among others).  With the aid of democrats in the house and senate, he passes laws that are blatantly unconstitutional.  If he can’t get the law he wants passed, he just gets his executive agencies to legislate via regulation, thus circumventing congress.

And he has the gall to accuse ANYBODY else of treason?  Keep blustering, peckerhead.  Start trying to arrest governors for this, and the s#$^’s gonna get real.
+

---

Obama Serves 14-State Governors With Warnings of Arrest: And why is this not front page news?

Tuesday, May 7, 2013 11:57
by Ken Larive

Barack Hussein Obama had served 14-State Governors in the United States, National Security Letters (NSLs) warning that the Governor’s actions in attempting to form “State Defense Forces” needs to be halted “immediately” or they will face arrest for the crime of treason. The employment of NSLs was authorized by the Patriot Act introduced by George W. Bush. Contained within the section related to these letters, it is forbidden for anyone receiving a NSL warning to even acknowledge the existence of said communication.

Obama is angered by the several State Governors who have reestablished “State Defense Forces.” These forces are described as: “State Defense Forces (also known as State Guards, State Military Reserves, State Militias) in the United States are military units that operate under the sole authority of a state government; they are not regulated by the National Guard Bureau nor are they part of the Army National Guard of the United States. State Defense Forces are authorized by state and federal law and are under the command of the governor of each state. State Defense Forces are distinct from their state’s National Guard in that they cannot become federal entities.”

Mr. Obama is fearful of these State Defense Forces, in that he does not have control of said forces, and with the U.S. Military stretched to near breaking from multiple deployments and theatre actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, these State military forces would be under the direct command and authority of the Governors in which states have said forces. In essence, the Governors would have “de facto control” of the United States.

The two Governors leading this move are: Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota; and Rick Perry, Governor of Texas. Both of these State Governors stated they have: “…deep fear the President is destroying their Nation.” Governor Pawlenty’s fear of Obama is that since Obama took office he has appeased America’s enemies and has shunned some of America’s strongest allies, especially Israel. Governor Perry has declared that Obama is punishing his State of Texas by dumping tens-of-thousands of illegal Mexican immigrants into the cities and small towns of Texas. Governor Perry further recently stated: “If Barack Obama’s Washington doesn’t stop being so oppressive, Texans might feel compelled to renounce their American citizenry and secede from the union.” (Yeeeeessss!!)

Obama fearing a revolution against him by the states, has moved swiftly by nationalizing nearly all National Guard Forces in multiple states; Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, Minnesota, Tennessee, Virginia, Louisiana, South Carolina – to name a few. The Governors of the Great States of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia still have under their Command-and-Control the State Defense Forces to go against U.S. Federal forces should the need arise. Also important to note: There are NO U.S. laws prohibiting National Guard troops from also joining their State’s Defense Forces. This dilemma occurred during the Civil War with many “citizen soldiers” choosing to serve their states instead of the Federal Government.

This is a fluid and still developing situation that warrants close attention.

---

The Benghazi Timeline: Lies, Youtube Videos, and Fundraisers. But What Difference Does It Make?

Hillary Clinton lied (not out of character for her).  Barack Obama slept, went to campaign fundraisers, THEN lied… repeatedly… about what happened at Benghazi.

Where are the Watergate-style investigative reporters from the mainstream liberal media now?  Oh, that’s right.  They only investigate conservative republicans.

Impeachment is a must for Obama.  If he were truly held accountable for all of the blatant breeches of the law he has done in the last four years, he would also be in prison.  He should be in the cell right next to Hillary.

But we know this will never happen without an overthrow of the government, because they are no longer accountable to we, the people.  And the government public relations firm known as the mainstream media isn’t going to expose any serious government wrongdoing.

Sorry, America.  The republic died while you slept.  Enjoy slavery.
+

---

May 4, 2013

The Complete Benghazi Timeline in Spreadsheet Format

Thomas Lifson

The evidence of a cover-up is becoming clear, thanks to information recently released about what happened at Benghazi. Doug Ross of Director Blue has pulled together information from  Stephen Hayes and the House Oversight Committee that leads to, in his words, “four inescapable conclusions”:

a) Hillary Clinton lied under oath to Congress.

b) Barack Obama went to sleep knowing that a U.S. Ambassador and other Americans were under terrorist attack.

c) Barack Obama awoke refreshed the next day to begin fundraising.

d) The entire Executive Branch lied repeatedly to the American people to save Obama’s chances for reelection.

Here’s the spreadsheet:

+
+

---

Crime is Only Legal If You’re a Politician

There is no “rule of law” in America anymore. There is only RULE.  We go to jail for what is PERFECTLY LEGAL for congress and the president to do.  WHY is it “legal” for them to do what we are forbidden to do?  BECAUSE THEY MAKE THE RULES, AND ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO NO ONE.  It’s not just democrats or republicans.  It’s ALL of them.

Look at all the politicians who went to Washington as financial nobodies, but who are now worth millions and millions of dollars.  Harry Reid, John Boehner, and Nancy Pelosi come immediately to mind.  Are you going to try to tell me they got that rich that fast on their congressional salary alone?  If so, you’re a special kind of stupid.  They have made it perfectly legal for themselves to do “insider trading.”  They buy and sell stocks based completely on the knowledge of laws that they themselves write, knowing how it will help or harm an industry or company.  Remember Martha Stewart?  She WENT TO JAIL for trading some stocks because she had word of what was going to happen to it.

Do you think perhaps we should let Martha Stewart lead the pitchfork brigade that storms Washington DC to burn it down?
+

---

In Gutting The STOCK Act, Congress Plays By Its Own Rules

By Sakib Ahmed on April 26th, 2013

The STOCK Act, a law that was designed to stop insider trading among government officials, was gutted last week when a key part of the law was repealed unanimously by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama. But if anything, it’s more of a surprise that Congress passed the law with such a wide margin in the first place given its ubiquity in Washington.

In an investigation a year and half ago, 60 Minutes uncovered evidence of several instances of insider trading among prominent government officials. The trades, while technically legal can hardly be considered ethical. One of these trades involved Alabama Representative Spencer Bachus, then the ranking Republican member on the House Financial Services Committee back in September 2008. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke were holding closed door briefings with congressional leaders, and privately warning them that a global financial meltdown could occur within a few days.

Reintroducing Obama Economic Advisers, Cloward and Piven

For those who are not familiar with, or have forgotten the influence of Obama’s “economic advisers” Cloward and Piven upon his strategy, and our current situation, here’s a refresher.
+

---

February 7, 2009

The Cloward/Piven Strategy of Economic Recovery

By Nancy Coppock

Their strategy is to bring about change by overwhelming and collapsing the system. Sadly, it’s working.

Using borrowed money for a band-aid bailout of the economy should seem backwards to most people. However, it likely is a planned strategy to promote radical change. Those naively believing that President Obama is simply rewarding his far-left base, and will then move to the political center, must wise up.

The assumption that Obama will need the nation to prosper in order to protect the 2010 mid-term election incorrectly assumes that he esteems free market capitalism. He does not. Rather than win through superior ideas and policies, the Democrat plan for success in the mid-term elections is to win by destroying political opposition.

Obama adheres to the Saul Alinksy Rules for Radicals method of politics, which teaches the dark art of destroying political adversaries. However, that text reveals only one front in the radical left’s war against America. The Cloward/Piven Strategy is another method employed by the radical Left to create and manage crisis. This strategy explains Rahm Emanuel’s ominous statement, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”

How Thomas Jefferson Led America’s First “War On Terror”

The threat we face from Islam is not new.  It is a threat that is as evil today as it was when it was founded.  The only difference is that they have learned to battle us using our own system against us. If we can not name the threat, and acknowledge the threat for what it is, it will consume and destroy as.

+

---

May 5, 2013 by Tim Brown

Today, I hear a lot of cries for tolerance, especially of Islam. I’m told, “Stop the hating of Muslims.” Many of the very people I hear this from like to point to the Constitution and to the Founding Fathers and especially to the First Amendment and declare that Islam should be tolerated in America. However, I wonder if they have paid attention to either the Constitution or the Founding Fathers on this matter. Specifically, I wonder if they have even considered the words and actions of the third President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, especially his sense of reading their own texts from the Qur’an and knowing just what his enemies thought. Let’s take a stroll down memory lane, shall we?

Barbary Wars: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cM97XzQn9IQ&feature=player_embedded

First, keep in mind that Islam and terrorism have gone hand in hand since its inception at the beginning of the 7^th century. In fact, it’s founder Muhammad was a terrorist and used “religion” to band his merry men together to conquer, rape and pillage.

“Immigration Reform” = Amnesty = More Democrat Voters

Let’s be clear. The democrat push for “immigration reform,” otherwise known as amnesty, is simply the blunt instrument to accomplish their aim of flipping Texas and some other red states to blue states, and ensure that a republican can never again get elected to the White House. It has nothing to do with helping America, or actually helping illegal immigrants. Because in the end, after legalizing upwards of 30 million illegals which our economy can’t absorb at this point, things for Americans will only get worse as economic conditions worsen, and taxes go up to pay for all the new “entitlement” payments.

Obama lets the curtain slip a little bit when he says

“It would provide a pathway to earned citizenship for the 11 million individuals who are already in this country illegally.”

As bad as that is, it’s still sugar coating the truth because there are likely more than double that number of illegals in the country, and that number is growing daily as disgruntled citizens of other countries are getting wind of a looming amnesty here. It will likely explode well beyond that with chain migration. Since latinos, who make up the bulk of the people who will be covered under the amnesty plan, reliably vote at nearly 80% for democrats, the reasoning for the amnesty push is clear.

Obama goes on to repeat the lie about border security by saying…

“The truth is, right now, our border with Mexico is more secure than it’s been in years. We’ve put more boots on that border than at any time in our history, and illegal crossings are down by nearly 80 percent from their peak in 2000. But we’ve got more to do – not just to secure the border but to fix an immigration system that is badly broken.”

No, according to the Border Patrol, the flow of illegals is exploding ahead of a looming amnesty. While there are more border agents than there were in 2000, that is largely due to a plan started by Bush, and begrudgingly continued by Obama. While we do need to “fix” the immigration system, his idea of “fixing” the problem with amnesty is NOT the answer.

Sources:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-mexico-immigration-reform-provides-citizenship-11-million-country-illegally_720688.html

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/msnbc/50589304#50589304

http://floppingaces.net/most_wanted/border-agent-build-up-blame-bush/

http://www.ktrh.com/articles/houston-news-121300/napolitano-insists-border-is-secure-11151064/

http://www.foxrio2.com/78504/immigration-surge-despite-napolitano-claims/

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/346591/southern-border-our-welcome-mat-terrorists

10 Need-to-Know Gun Control Myths (Lies)

The left CAN’T win the debate on gun control (or any other issue) based on facts or the merit of their argument.  The ONLY way they can advance their agenda is to lie about it.  That is pretty easy with a government run media arm helping them push their lies on a receptive public.
+

---

10 Need-to-Know Gun Control Myths

by Kyle Wintersteen | May 1, 2013

Those who favor a society without gun rights seem to be prone to spreading false information. At best, anti-gun leaders unknowingly spread baseless accusations; at worst, they willingly to lie to achieve their objectives. Regardless, it is my observation that a host of gun control myths began circulating during the 1960s and continue today.

For instance, how many times have you heard President Barack Obama pushing the Manchin-Toomey gun control bill because, according to the him, 90 percent of Americans support so-called universal background checks? Well, a Pew Research poll was conducted after the Senate defeated the bill. Turns out only 47 percent of Americans are disappointed the bill failed, while 32 percent describe themselves as “very happy” or “relieved.” So, Mr. President, you can quit arguing that the country is behind you on this.

If we can spread the truth about this myth now, maybe it will die. But there are other, older myths that have festered for years. Unfortunately, as the saying goes, if a lie is spread enough, it becomes the truth. Even some gun owners can start to believe the nonsense, which is particularly dangerous in the current political environment. So the next time you hear a gun-control advocate rattling off one of these myths, shock him with the truth.