• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    May 2024
    M T W T F S S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    texan2driver on NY Doctor Confirms Trump Was R…
    markone1blog on NY Doctor Confirms Trump Was R…
    markone1blog on It’s Only OK for Kids to…
    America On Coffee on Is Healthcare a “Right?…
    texan2driver on Screw Fascistbook and *uc…
  • Archives

America’s Funeral Procession

To the US Supreme Court who refused to even hear the case that is CLEARLY under their jurisdiction, instead choosing to hide behind “procedure,” to the judges at the state level who are legislating from the bench, to the politicians at all levels who didn’t stop them, or were in league with them, you need to understand this. The funeral pyres of America have been lit, and as you watch America burn, as you watch the coming civil war rip us apart, as you cower in horror as the angry mobs kick in your door to drag you into the streets, your last thoughts should be “I could have stopped this.” May God have mercy on us all.

How the Election Was Stolen

The back doors into electronic voting machines were known and reported well before the election, but were swept under the rug. Without actual paper ballots to verify the vote, there’s no way to verify that there was cheating. That is by design.

+


A Piece of the Stolen Election

Another piece in the puzzle that when completed will show a communist, fraud, thug, and cheat who is occupying the Oval Office.  You have nationwide allegations of voter fraud, Black Panthers intimidating voters at the polling places, and foreigners donating untold sums of money to Obama and other democrats.  If the margin of victory had been greater than 2.5%, maybe this would only be important in the sense that laws were broken.  However, with a margin that close the legitimacy of Obama’s “victory” can legitimately be questioned.  He only won by about a half percent more than Bush did, yet the liberals are calling Obama’s win a “landslide.”  Where are the cries of “stolen election” now?  In the past three elections, nearly all of the voter fraud has been associated with democratic candidates.  Why do you suppose that is?  Now you have Mr. Community Organizer trying to cover his tracks and his associations with many of these left wing groups committing illegal activities.  Did you see his interview with George Snuffleupagus this weekend?  Snuffy at least asked him about ACORN receiving federal funds and whether or not he thought the government should cut them off.  Obama lied YET AGAIN when he said he didn’t know that ACORN had received federal funds.  Obama was a paid lawyer for ACORN, basically had a hand in its foundation, litigated on their behalf in several matters involving federals funds, and OBTW they’ve been taking federal money for nearly fifteen years.  To quote Joe Wilson, “You lie!” Mr. Obama.  Then he dodged yet again saying that he wasn’t paying attention to the topic as it wasn’t the most important thing going on right now.  Mr. Snuffleupagus, along with all other members of fringe group formerly known as the mainstream media, just let him go and did not pursue him any further.  These same “reporters” would have, and sometimes did call Bush a liar to his face, and then they would go on the attack.  Media bias, anyone?  And they wonder why they can’t sell news papers anymore, and their TV/Cable ratings have gone down the toilet.  Is it any wonder that FOX News beats all of the other outlets COMBINED by 5 to 1?

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=USTRE58K5A420090921

U.S. charges Obama fund-raiser in $290 million fraud

Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:25pm EDT

By Grant McCool

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Hassan Nemazee, a fund-raiser for Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other Democrats, has been indicted for defrauding Bank of America, HSBC and Citigroup Inc out of more than $290 million in loan proceeds, U.S. prosecutors said on Monday.

The announcement follows last month’s indictment of Nemazee, head of a private equity firm and an Iranian American Political Action Committee board member, on one count of defrauding Citigroup’s Citibank.

The new indictment adds allegations that he defrauded two other banks, Bank of America and HSBC Bank USA, in a similar fashion by falsifying documents and signatures to purportedly show he had hundreds of millions worth of collateral.

The office of the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan and the FBI said he used the proceeds of his scheme to make donations to election campaigns of federal, state and local candidates, donations to political action committees and charities.

He bought property in Italy and paid for maintenance on two properties in New York.

His lawyer could not immediately be reached for comment.

As of August 2009 Nemazee owed Bank of America about $142 million and owed Citibank about $74.9 million, the indictment said. He drew on a line of credit he fraudulently obtained from HSBC to pay the Citibank loan.

Nemazee, 59, typically donates more than $100,000 annually to Democratic political candidates. He is listed as one of the top “bundlers” of contributions to Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, according to OpenSecrets.org, a website run by the Center for Responsive Politics research group.

“For more than 10 years, Hassan Nemazee projected the illusion of wealth, stealing more than $290 million so that he could lead a lavish lifestyle and play the part of heavyweight political fundraiser,” United States Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan said in a statement.

Nemazee was arrested at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey on August 23 as he was checking in for a flight to Italy, according to court papers. He was released on bail.

If convicted on three counts of bank fraud, Nemazee faces up to 30 years in prison and millions of dollars in fines. He is also charged with identity theft.

The case is: U.S. v. Nemazee, 09-mj-1927 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

(Reporting by Grant McCool, editing by Leslie Gevirtz and Matthew Lewis)

Inquiry Opened on Dismissal of New Black Panthers Voter Intimidation Case

The New Black Panthers are just another battalion in the Obama army of thugs.  Depending on who you listen to, and how they massage the stats, Obama won the election by somewhere between 4 and 7 percent of the vote.  In what the left is calling a “landslide,” he won by just 0.2% more than G.W. Bush did in 2004.  With a margin that small, and with all of the voter fraud that has been reported (but not investigated) in several of the swing states/districts, there is legitimate speculation that much of the margin of victory was ill gotten and that were it a straight up vote Obama would not have won at all.  With ACORN registering the same voters (liberal ones) 10 to 20 times each (confirmed cases), and the Black Panther thugs threatening people outside the polling places, it wouldn’t take much to swing that small of a margin of victory in a race as tight as the 2008 presidential election.  Co-thug Eric Holder’s dismissal of the Black Panther case (at the direction of Obama) when a conviction was at hand screams of impropriety.  Holder’s silence when asked for explanations is deafening.

As long as Comrade Chairman Maobama is in charge, and his puppets are running the “justice” department, there will likely never be an accounting for Obama’s illegal activities, and the crimes at the hands of his supporters.  Community organizer?  No, just plain old socialist thug.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/09/inquiry-opened-about-new-black-panther-case//print/

Officials turn down Franken request in Minn. race

Coleman is hanging on by the skin of his teeth. Franken-stein and the democrats have all but succeeded in stealing that election, but there is still one small ember of hope.

Officials turn down Franken request in Minn. race
By BRIAN BAKST
Associated Press
January 13, 2009

ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Democrat Al Franken was quickly turned down Monday when he asked Minnesota’s governor and secretary of state to issue an election certificate that would let him take office in the Senate.

In letters the campaign sent to Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty and Democratic Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, Franken’s lawyers argued that a seven-day waiting period for issuing the certificate after an election has passed and he should get the signed certificate. But the state officials said their hands were tied by state law and they could not act.

Franken led Republican Norm Coleman by 225 votes after a statewide recount that was completed Jan. 5.

Coleman is suing over the result, claiming there were irregularities on Election Day and during the recount.

Minnesota law prevents officials from issuing an election certificate until legal matters are resolved. But Franken’s legal team argues that federal election law entitles Franken to receive the certificate before the lawsuit is settled.

“The people of Minnesota are down a senator in the U.S. Senate. This is an opportunity for Governor Pawlenty and Secretary Ritchie to ensure the interests of all Minnesotans are represented in Washington,” Franken lawyer Marc Elias told reporters in a conference call. He didn’t rule out a lawsuit.

In a statement, Ritchie said state law requires him and the governor to turn down Franken’s request.

“Minnesota law is very clear on when a certificate of election can be issued. Neither the governor nor I may sign a certificate of election in the U.S. Senate race until all election contests have reached a final determination,” Ritchie’s statement read.

The statement didn’t specifically address Franken’s argument that federal law supercedes the state law.

Pawlenty echoed Ritchie, saying it is clear the law won’t allow him to issue a certificate while the race is being contested in court.

Coleman campaign manager Cullen Sheehan dismissed the move as a power play meant to get around Franken’s need to defend the election outcome in court.

“He can’t and won’t be seated in a seat he didn’t win, so he is trying this underhanded attempt to blatantly ignore the will of Minnesotans and the laws of the state,” Sheehan said.

Franken’s campaign was due to file a response to Coleman’s lawsuit later Monday. Elias characterized the Coleman action as “riddled with errors that are fatal to much if not all of the claims made in the petition.”

By law, a trial on the lawsuit must start within three weeks of its filing, which occurred last Tuesday. It will be heard by a three-judge panel that includes one Republican appointee, one Democratic appointee and one named by an independent governor.

Democrats Stealing Yet Another Election

One Plus One Equals 20 Extra Votes For Franken
by Ann Coulter (more by this author)
Posted 12/17/2008 ET
Updated 12/17/2008 ET

It’s bad enough that the Republican Party can’t prevent Democrats from voting in its primaries and saddling us with The New York Times’ favorite Republican as our presidential nominee. If the Republican Party can’t protect an election won by the incumbent U.S. senator in Minnesota, there is no point in donating to the Republican Party.

The day after the November election, Republican Sen. Norm Coleman had won his re-election to the U.S. Senate, beating challenger Al Franken by 725 votes.

Then one heavily Democratic town miraculously discovered 100 missing ballots. And, in another marvel, they were all for Al Franken! It was like a completely evil version of a Christmas miracle.

As strange as it was that all 100 post-election, “discovered” ballots would be for one candidate, it was even stranger that the official time stamp for the miracle ballots printed out by the voting machine on the miracle ballots showed that the votes had been cast on Nov. 2 — two days before the election.

Democratic election officials in the miracle-ballot county simply announced that their voting machine must have been broken. Don’t worry about it — they were sure those 100 votes for Franken were legit.

Then another 400-odd statistically improbable “corrections” were made in other Democratic strongholds until — by the end of election week — Coleman’s lead had been whittled down to a mere 215 votes.

Since then, highly irregular counting methods have added to Franken’s total bit by bit, to the point that Coleman is now ahead by only 188 votes.

As long as Coleman maintains any lead at all, Republicans don’t seem to care that Coleman’s advantage is being shrunk by laughable ballot “discoveries” and disreputable standard-switching from precinct to precinct — depending on which method of counting ballots is most advantageous to Franken.

Consider a few other chilling examples of Democrats thieving their way to victory over the years.

In 1974, Republican Louis Wyman won his race for U.S. Senate in New Hampshire, beating Democrat John Durkin by 355 votes. Durkin demanded a recount — which went back and forth by a handful of votes until the state’s Ballot Law Commission concluded that Wyman had indeed won by (at least) two votes.

Wyman was certified the winner by the New Hampshire secretary of state and was on his way to Washington when … the overwhelmingly Democratic U.S. Senate refused to seat Wyman.

Despite New Hampshire’s certification of Wyman as the winner of the election, this was the post-Watergate Senate, when Democrats could get away with anything — up to and including a prank known as “President Jimmy Carter.”

The U.S. Senate spent months examining disputed ballots from the New Hampshire election. Unable to come up with a method to declare the Democrat the winner that didn’t require a guillotine, the Senate forced New Hampshire to hold another election.

It was a breathtaking abuse of power. New Hampshire had certified a winner of its Senate election, but it was a Republican, so the Democratic Senate simply ordered a new election.

Demoralized Republicans stayed away from the race and, this time, the Democrat won the re-vote.

Even more egregious was the Indiana House race in 1984. On election night, the incumbent Democrat Frank McCloskey appeared to have won a narrow victory of 72 votes. But after a correction was made in one county, it turned out his Republican opponent, Richard McIntyre, had won by 34 votes.

McIntyre was certified the winner — which is when the trouble usually starts for a Republican.

Again, a majority Democrat House refused to seat the certified winner in a close election. I’m sure it was just a coincidence that the winner was a Republican.

Consequently, Indiana performed yet another recount of the entire district, which again showed that Republican McIntyre was the winner — this time by 418 votes. Now he was really asking for it. The nerve of this guy! Hey, buddy, do you mind? We’re trying to throw an election over here!

As The Washington Post reported at the time: There were “no allegations of fraud” in the recount and 90 percent of ballot disqualifications had been agreed to “by election commissions dominated by Democrats.”

So naturally the House refused to seat the Republican even though he had received the most votes (hereinafter referred to as “the winner”). The House proceeded to conduct its own recount. (If you haven’t detected a pattern by this point, please ask your doctor if Prilosec is right for you.)

This time, instead of ordering the district to hold another election, the Democratic House saved all concerned a lot of time and money by simply declaring Democrat Frank McCloskey the winner by four votes.

The vote-theft most like Minnesota this year was the infamous 2004 gubernatorial election in Washington State. The Republican won the race on election night, but ballots favoring the Democrat kept being “discovered” until the Democrat finally eked out a majority. At that point, the recount was immediately halted and the Democrat declared the victor.

You would have to go back to Reconstruction to find an election that was stolen by the Republicans this way, but it’s all in a day’s work for the Democrats.

That’s why they were so testy about the 2000 Florida election. It was the one time in the last century Republicans wouldn’t let Democrats steal an election they lost by less than a thousand votes.

No matter how many times Democrats steal elections, Republicans keep thinking the next time will be different. Minnesota is famously clean, isn’t it? It must different. It’s not different. It’s still the Democrats.

Ann Coulter is Legal Affairs Correspondent for HUMAN EVENTS and author of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors,” “Slander,” “”How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must),” “Godless,” and most recently, “If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans.”