• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    May 2024
    M T W T F S S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    texan2driver on NY Doctor Confirms Trump Was R…
    markone1blog on NY Doctor Confirms Trump Was R…
    markone1blog on It’s Only OK for Kids to…
    America On Coffee on Is Healthcare a “Right?…
    texan2driver on Screw Fascistbook and *uc…
  • Archives

Parler CEO Flees Home with Family After Receiving Death Threats

Don’t go out and MAKE trouble, but STAND AND FIGHT to defend yourself. If they attack you, your family, and/or your home, meet them with lethal force.


Parler CEO Flees Home with His Family, Goes Into Hiding After Receiving Death Threats

By Cristina Laila
Published January 15, 2021 at 7:32pm
289 Comments Share (517) Tweet Share Email

Parler CEO John Matze has gone into hiding with his family after receiving death threats.

Because of Big Tech censorship, Parler, the free speech alternative to Twitter, became the fastest growing social media company — until they got deplatformed by Amazon, Apple and Google in a coordinated attack.

Last week Amazon kicked Parler off their webhosting service, meaning the platform will be offline until they find a new host.

Parler has faced what can only be described as a mass coordinated cyber attack by Big Tech, first being banned by Apple and Google within a 24 hour time period.

Parler responded to the deplatforming by filing a lawsuit against Amazon.

According to a new filing by Parler’s lawyers, John Matze was forced to flee his home with his family and go into hiding after receiving “deaths threats” and “invasive personal security breaches.”

Wow: Parler CEO John Matze has fled his home with his family and they all have gone into hiding after receiving “deaths threats” and “invasive personal security breaches,” according to a new filing from Parler’s lawyers in the suit with AWS. pic.twitter.com/pRSbkCPWIu

— Bobby Allyn (@BobbyAllyn) January 16, 2021


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/parler-ceo-flees-home-goes-hiding-receiving-death-threats/

1984’s Big Brother is Upon Us. Yet No One Seems to Care

Imagine your entire existence being directed by someone else.  You’re told when to get up, when to sleep; when, what, and how much to eat; when and how much you MUST exercise; what job you will have, regardless of whether you want it or not; whether you are allowed to travel; what you’re allowed to possess, because you don’t actually OWN anything since it all belongs to the state; etc, etc, etc.

The technology monitored the characters in the book “1984” and was used to keep them in line, and that book read like a prophecy when you look at today’s technology and how it is increasingly being used to influence and even control our lives.

Carry your phone everywhere?  The phone companies, and the government, track your every move by monitoring your phone.  Like the convenience of credit/debit cards, Apple Pay, and other such cashless methods of payment?  The companies, and the government, track your location and spending habits, know what you buy, what you eat, etc with those digital “currencies.”  Think we should have a cashless society?  When a government employee or banker with a simple keystroke can decide how much money you “have,” and whether or not you will be allowed to access and use it, they control your life.  With cash, you have at least SOME measure of freedom and autonomy.

It’s here, folks.  If you don’t wise up, and WE don’t make the hard choices to ensure that safeguards are in place to prevent this tech from being used to RULE us, we will indeed become subjects.  One way or another.

+



Is Big Tech Merging With Big Brother? Kinda Looks Like It

David Samuels | Opinion | 1/23/19

A friend of mine, who runs a large television production company in the car-mad city of Los Angeles, recently noticed that his intern, an aspiring filmmaker from the People’s Republic of China, was walking to work.

When he offered to arrange a swifter mode of transportation, she declined. When he asked why, she explained that she “needed the steps” on her Fitbit to sign in to her social media accounts. If she fell below the right number of steps, it would lower her health and fitness rating, which is part of her social rating, which is monitored by the government. A low social rating could prevent her from working or traveling abroad.

China’s social rating system, which was announced by the ruling Communist Party in 2014, will soon be a fact of life for many more Chinese.

By 2020, if the Party’s plan holds, every footstep, keystroke, like, dislike, social media contact, and posting tracked by the state will affect one’s social rating.

Personal “creditworthiness” or “trustworthiness” points will be used to reward and punish individuals and companies by granting or denying them access to public services like health care, travel, and employment, according to a plan released last year by the municipal government of Beijing. High-scoring individuals will find themselves in a “green channel,” where they can more easily access social opportunities, while those who take actions that are disapproved of by the state will be “unable to move a step.”

Big Brother is an emerging reality in China. Yet in the West, at least, the threat of government surveillance systems being integrated with the existing corporate surveillance capacities of big-data companies like Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon into one gigantic all-seeing eye appears to trouble very few people—even as countries like Venezuela have been quick to copy the Chinese model.

Still, it can’t happen here, right? We are iPhone owners and Amazon Prime members, not vassals of a one-party state. We are canny consumers who know that Facebook is tracking our interactions and Google is selling us stuff.

Yet it seems to me there is little reason to imagine that the people who run large technology companies have any vested interest in allowing pre-digital folkways to interfere with their 21st-century engineering and business models, any more than 19th-century robber barons showed any particular regard for laws or people that got in the way of their railroads and steel trusts.

Read entire article here:  https://www.wired.com/story/is-big-tech-merging-with-big-brother-kinda-looks-like-it/

Google Approves App For Muslims To Report People Who Commit Blasphemy

No, this is not a joke. The app, “Smart Pakem”, which launched in Indonesia last month at the request of the Indonesian government, will allow users and government officials to uphold Sharia law and target and report people who hold “misguided” beliefs in violation of Islamic law, which forbids insults of Islam, insults against the Prophet Mohammed, or the recognition of any other religion besides Islam.

Link to article: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/google-approves-app-for-muslims-to-report-people-who-commit-blasphemy/
So much to unpack here.  Let’s start a list.

  • Low Hanging Fruit:  Google isn’t putting any energy into developing an app to report blasphemy against Christ and the Holy Spirit.  Just sayin’…
  • Islam isn’t a religion, but an oppressive system of government hiding behind a thin veneer of religion.
  • Like every other oppressive system of government, islam can’t/won’t tolerate anyone looking behind the curtain of truth, and can’t/won’t tolerate dissent.  Allowing transparency, allowing differing opinions, allowing open debate, and allowing FREE SPEECH in a totalitarian system leads to people figuring out the TRUTH, which leads to the oppressive leaders in their cushy positions of power being overthrown.  Mullahs, czars, dictators, etc. thrive on power and won’t give it up willingly.
  • Islam is incompatible with America and our Constitution.
    • A “right” is something to which one is entitled that by definition does not take away from another’s rights.
      • Example:  A RIGHT to free speech.  You can say anything you want, even if it’s offensive, as long as it doesn’t cross a line of slander/defamation.  That would unjustly take away from someone’s reputation.
      • Example:  You have a right to swing your fist anywhere you want as long as it doesn’t hit me, or my possessions, which would take away from my physical well being, and deprive me of my property without due process.
    • Islam will not tolerate any other religion or form of government, and seeks to replace it with islam, which would take away all of our constitutional rights.
    • Islam instructs its followers to murder of non-muslims.
    • Our 1st Amendment protects the freedom of religion AS LONG AS THE EXERCISE OF THAT RELIGION DOESN’T DEPRIVE ANOTHER OF THEIR RIGHTS.
    • Since islamic law forbids free speech, prevents the free exercise of religions OTHER THAN ISLAM, and tells followers to murder non-believers and take their possessions, islam is NOT protected under the 1st Amendment of our Constitution.
  • Thus, islam IS NOT PROTECTED BY OUR CONSTITUTION, should be banned in America, anyone who claims islam as their “religion” should be deported, and all mosques razed to the ground.

None of the cowards in our government have the courage to make this obviously constitutional argument, which is why without a civil war to restore the Constitution, it and our nation will eventually be overthrown by islam or some other cancerous ideology that no one has the courage to stop the spread of.