• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    May 2024
    M T W T F S S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    texan2driver on NY Doctor Confirms Trump Was R…
    markone1blog on NY Doctor Confirms Trump Was R…
    markone1blog on It’s Only OK for Kids to…
    America On Coffee on Is Healthcare a “Right?…
    texan2driver on Screw Fascistbook and *uc…
  • Archives

Just One More Thing…

Just one more thing on ObamaCare Repeal.

Since only 11 million people have ObamaCare, how will 24 million people die if it is repealed? Will an additional 13 million people be randomly shot?

Just one more thing on Donald Trump.

If Donald Trump deleted all of his emails, wiped his server with Bleachbit and destroyed all of his phones with a hammer, would the Mainstream Media suddenly lose all interest in the story and declare him innocent?

 

Just one more thing on equal pay.
If women do the same job for less money, why do companies hire men to do the same job for more money?


Just one more thing on Sanctuary Cities.

If you rob a bank in a Sanctuary City, is it illegal or is it just an Undocumented Withdrawal?

 

Just one more thing on ISIS

Each ISIS attack now is a reaction to Trump policies, but all ISIS attacks during Obama’s term were due to Climate Change and a plea for jobs.

 

Just one more thing on the London ‘Lone Wolf’ terror attack.
After the London ‘Lone Wolf’ terrorist attack government officials have arrested at least eight other ‘Lone Wolves’ who had conspired with the original ‘Lone Wolf’ in planning the ‘Lone Wolf’ attack.  Even though all involved are Muslims, you can be assured, the ‘Lone Wolf’ attack has nothing at all to do with Islam, just like the other 1000 plus ‘Lone Wolf’ attacks by Muslims, are completely unassociated with Islam.

 

Just one more thing on Entitlements.

We should stop calling them all ‘Entitlements’.

Welfare, Food Stamps, WIC, ad nauseum are not entitlements. They are taxpayer-funded handouts, and shouldn’t be called entitlements at all.  Social Security is SUPPOSED to be an entitlement because the people receiving it are supposed to have paid into the system in order to receive benefits from it.  Veterans Benefits are Entitlements because the people receiving them EARNED them. They were earned and paid for by the recipients.

Just one more thing on the Muslim Refugees.

If Muslims want to run away from a Muslim country, does that mean they’re Islamophobic?


Just one more thing on The Women’s March.

If Liberals don’t believe in biological gender then why did they march for women’s rights?


Just one more thing on the Russians hacking the election.

How did the Russians get Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC to steal the Primary from Bernie Sanders? How did Russia get Donna Brazile to leak debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of the debates?

 

Just one more thing on Democrats and the Electoral College.

Why is it that Democrats think Super delegates are fine, but they have a problem with the Electoral College?

 

Just one more thing on the FBI and elections.

If you don’t want the FBI involved in elections, don’t nominate someone who’s being investigated by the FBI.
Just one more thing on Hillary’s speeches.

If Hillary’s speeches cost $250,000 an hour, how come no one shows up to her free ones?

 

Just one more thing on Russia manipulating our election.

The DNC is mad at Russia because they ‘think’ they are trying to manipulate our election by exposing that the DNC is manipulating our election?

 

Just one more thing on foreign involvement in our elections.

If Democrats don’t want foreigners involved in our elections, why do they think it’s all right for illegals to vote?

Key Obamacare Architect: We Had to Lie to Pass Obamacare

Keep in mind, Gruber isn’t just some random flunky off the streets.  He was one of the key architects responsible for writing the law.  IN HIS OWN WORDS he describes how those who crafted the law had to lie to the American people to get it passed.  It was written specifically in such a way that the CBO would not (at the time) score the things hidden in Obamacare as taxes, or it couldn’t have passed.  They had to hide the fact that healthy people would pay in for sick people to get more money.  He says “lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” or more accurately, ‘lying was the only way we could pass this.’  He calls the American people ‘stupid’.  And lastly, understand that Obamacare is a 100% DEMOCRAT LAW, passed without a single Republican vote, and passed despite a majority of Americans NOT wanting this law at the time, and a larger majority who oppose it now.

Remember the lies that the President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, told the American people over and over again trying to drum up support for this government takeover of our healthcare system.

“If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period.”

“If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period.”

“In an Obama Administration, we’ll lower premiums by up to $2,500 for a typical family per year.”

“Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase.”

“I will protect Medicare.”

Conservatives who read the law before it was passed tried to warn everyone that these lies were just that.  Lies.  Now the pain of these lies is being felt by nearly everyone, and it is only getting worse as premiums and penalties are set to go up AGAIN in January.  Costs are skyrocketing as availability and quality of care deteriorate as more and more doctors either refuse to accept Obamacare, or are just leaving practice altogether, as we predicted they would. 

There is only one course of action acceptable to recover from this disaster.  FULL REPEAL OF OBAMACARE.
+



 


+



Does McCain suddenly think Cruz isn’t a ‘whacko bird?’

Greta: “That is repeal.”

McCain: “That is exactly right.”

McCain, you are a brain damaged old fool AT BEST. You are NOW talking about REPEALING OBAMCARE, about tort reform, buying insurance across state lines, etc, etc. All the things that CONSERVATIVES were talking about all along, and the things that YOU were calling conservatives like Ted Cruz ‘whacko birds’ for, and saying that repeal was impractical, etc. just a few short weeks ago. So, John.  Do you expect us to believe you had a sudden epiphany about how bad Obamacare was, and that you just realized how right Ted Cruz actually was?  Or do you expect us to think that you believed these things all along?  We’re not stupid, John.  We know you are lying to save your own skin.  Now, just like the progressive democrats who are scrambling to cover their butts because they are up for reelection, YOU are now doing the same thing and saying stuff that sounds good JUST TO KEEP YOUR FREAKING WORTHLESS JOB. As soon as you get reelected, you will without a doubt return to your deceitful ways and stab conservatives and America in the back yet again. You have proven that you can’t be trusted.

You are a disgrace to yourself, the GOP, and to America as a whole. You sicken me, John McCain. You stab conservatives in the back while cozying up to democrats, then try to act conservative to save your own skin. Why not just end the charade and call yourself a democrat? Quit lying about who you are, and what you stand for. Better yet, if you have a single atom of honor left in your body that the Vietnamese didn’t beat out of you, you will resign and just go away. But since I’m pretty sure you won’t resign, that tells me all I need to know about how honorable you really are, or more to the point, are not.

 


Watch the video segment of McCain being interviewed by Greta Van Susteren here:  http://video.foxnews.com/v/2836553272001/111313mccain759/

 


Obama Admin Backs Bill to Overturn Defense of Marriage Act

This man and his ilk are hell bent on destroying American institutions, marginalizing Christians, and destroying the Judeo-Christian values upon which the foundation of this country were built.

This crap about hiding behind the name of this “Respect for Marriage Act” is ludicrous.  Marriage BY DEFINITION is the union between ONE man, and ONE woman.  That doesn’t prevent homosexuals from having “civil unions” or whatever you want to call them.  This in an intentional attack on the traditional institution of marriage.

He. Must. Be. Stopped.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-admin-backs-bill-to-overturn-defense-of-marriage-act/

Obama Admin Backs Bill to Overturn Defense of Marriage Act

The White House is supporting legislation to overturn the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The controversial law, passed in 1996 by large majorities in both the House and Senate and signed by Democratic President Bill Clinton, defines marriage as between one man and one woman. In contrast, a new bill — the Respect for Marriage Act — would repeal DOMA and clear the way for gay couples to be federally recognized.

Continue reading

The repeal of DADT from a retired Senior NCO’s Point of View

“…the majority (66%) of the military either does not want this change or refused to answer the survey.”

“48% of Marines responded that they will consider leaving the Corps earlier than planned.”

“Of the 17,000 homosexuals who have been discharged from the military since the implementation of DADT 85% self-identified in order to leave the military.”

Nope. No chance to harm the military here.


http://www.coachisright.com/the-repeal-of-dadt-from-a-retired-senior-nco%E2%80%99s-point-of-view/#

The repeal of DADT from a retired Senior NCO’s Point of View

By Coach Collins, on December 26th, 2010
By Jim Emerson, staff writer

On December 22 Barack Obama signed into law the repeal of the “Don’t Ask Don’t tell Policy” (DADT) starting the process to eliminate the military’s ban on openly gay troops. Even though the law is in effect, the complete removal of certain personal conduct provisions in the UCMJ will take time, but the end of DADT is here.

Survey

The So-called survey used to justify this change was a joke. It was nothing more than a con job to sell the American people the concept of allowing gays to openly serve in our military. What the pundits won’t tell you is that the majority (66%) of the military either does not want this change or refused to answer the survey. Of the troops that responded approximately 36% planned on leaving military service rather than deal with openly gay members.

Forty eight percent of Marines responded that they will consider leaving the Corps earlier than planned. As reported by Andrew Breitbart, “Such findings should make it impossible for President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen to “certify” that no harm will be done by implementation of their own plans for repeal. The president’s political promise to LGBT Left groups has been assigned highest priority, at the expense of Army and Marine combat troops whose voices were heard but ignored.”

Plan for Implementation

Obama’s DOD has a Support Plan for Implementation. This is a nice little pamphlet that would prohibit the separation of Gay and Heterosexual troops, offer mandatory re-education programs and of course the ever popular “zero tolerance” for noncompliance. Oh yeah! It also addresses same sex marriage.
This plan pretty much states you must agree with the Homosexual agenda or else.

A Little Known Fact

Of the 17,000 homosexuals who have been discharged from the military since the implementation of DADT 85% self-identified in order to leave the military. Despite the propaganda provided by the Service Members Legal Defense Network the military hasn’t been on a witch hunt to weed out gay members; who needs to? The gays are too busy outing themselves or their lovers are dropping the dime on them.

From A Retired SNCO Point of View

Being in charge of troops is hard enough, now the Community Organizer have created a mess that any hardened Senior NCO will see as a difficult situation. Homosexuals are demanding preferential treatment. They can threaten or blackmail anyone who doesn’t agree with their lifestyle. Gays will be legally protected while participating in voyeurism of their fellow troops. In time, base chaplains will be directed to perform same sex marriages. Off-base businesses will be black listed it they refuse service to gays.

There will be little if any good coming from this social experiment. There’s nothing worse than a troop receiving special consideration to destroy a unit’s morale. Once that is lost, all control and discipline is lost. Once that happens leadership will be useless.

Why?

Why were the Democrats in a rush to repeal DADT during the lame duck session? My guess is it was to distract attention away from Obama’s failed economic policies and re-energize their base after the shellacking they received last November.
In 2012 let’s make sure we remember the Republicans who helped the Democrats destroy our military.

Editor’s note: Due to an ongoing intractable CiR.com is currently unable to link the sites used in this essay. To read more about this story, use these links via the cut and paste method. We apologize for any inconvenience this situation may cause.

Click to access Vol%201_Appendix%20A%20-%20Appendix%20AL.pdf

http://bigpeace.com/edonnelly/2010/12/19/dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-congress-ignores-combat-troops/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/dec/22/obama-signs-dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal2/

Click to access DADTReport-SPI_FINAL_20101130(secure-hires).pdf

+


(Formerly) Mainstream Media Pronounced Brain Dead, Plug to be Pulled

This just proves that there is no brain activity in the media formerly known as mainstream.  They are doing the usual liberal “you didn’t hear me say what you heard me say” routine, a.k.a. REVISIONIST HISTORY.  First, Obama and the state run media sell Stimulus 1 as “shovel ready” for immediate results in the economy.  Now they are saying they didn’t say that.  Sorry, we have it on record.  Then you get this real gem of sound logic from the NY Times.

They also knew that the size of the final package – which was whittled down in part to ensure its passage in Congress – was not big enough to completely offset the projected drop in the nation’s economic output, which administration officials believed at the time would perform at $2 trillion below its capacity over the next two years.

Let me see if I can simplify their logic for you.  I have a one gallon bucket (representing the economy).  That bucket gets a hole in it and begins to lose water (wealth and jobs).  Rather than drilling for more water (cutting taxes and removing impediments to businesses that create jobs and wealth), I will dip water from the bucket and pour it right back into the bucket and say that I am refilling it (the “stimulus” money was taken from the “bucket” of our economy without creating more jobs or wealth).  The bucket continues to leak, and even more water is evaporating with each dip from the bucket.  Got it?

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

logo

Published on NewsBusters.org (http://newsbusters.org)

Media Campaigning for Second Stimulus Package

By Candance Moore
Created 2009-10-13 14:21
Eight months after President Obama signed a stimulus package worth $787 billion, less than half the funds [1] have been spent and nearly half [2] of Americans want the remainder to be repealed.Of course, that hasn’t stopped the mainstream media from pushing for more.

Recall that before the first bill was even signed, Reuters [3] hailed a statement from billionaire George Soros warning that it wouldn’t be enough. In July, NewYork Times columnist Paul Krugman called the bill [4] “inadequate” and bemoaned fiscal conservatives for their “bittter and unrelenting” skepticism.

Now, despite unemployment approaching double digits [5], the federal deficit [6] exploding, and rumors flying that the world is dumping its dollars [7], liberal newpapers have unabashasedly increased their call for more “stimulus.”

An October 6 article [8] from the NY Times first provided some revisionist history to advance the fiscally-challenged cause:

The stimulus was never intended to be a put-shovels-in-the-hands-of-people-on-relief type of New Deal public works program: it was, rather, a combination of tax cuts, aid to states and money for infrastructure projects that would be put out for bid to private contractors and take time to get going.

Those of us with functioning memories know that President Obama did [9] sell the stimulus as a “shovel ready” program. But no matter to the Times.

Aside from that detail, what came next in the article was the real jaw dropper:

They also knew that the size of the final package – which was whittled down in part to ensure its passage in Congress – was not big enough to completely offset the projected drop in the nation’s economic output, which administration officials believed at the time would perform at $2 trillion below its capacity over the next two years.

Yes, according to the Times, an effective stimulus package would have pumped $2 trillion into the economy. Considering that the entire national debt currently stands [10] around $12 trillion, that much spending would increase it tremendously.

Regardless, the Washington Post [11] continued the drumbeat the very next day:

But this has been such a profound, job-destroying recession that even $787 billion wasn’t sufficient. And changes made to secure some bipartisan support in the Senate last February rendered the stimulus less effective than it might have been…The White House is in the position of defending the stimulus and urging that we do more.

And don’t look now, but Congress appears to be working on doing more. The AP noted [12] on October 8 that politicians are trying to craft a new stimulus without actually calling it a stimulus.

Not to worry, for with media that are clearly enthusiastic about more spending, President Obama should have no problem finding support for the new measure irrespective of the name it’s given.

After all, to today’s so-called journalists, a stimulus by any other name would smell as sweet.


-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

HR 1388 GIVE Act Aimed at “Re-Educating” and Indoctrinating Your Children

I started reading (yes, actually reading) the WHOLE bill last night. I’ve gotten about half way through it so far, and what I’ve seen so far SCARES THE LIVING CRAP OUT OF ME!

Here are some of things that scare me about what I’ve read so far:

  • “Service Learning”: Thinly veiled wording for indoctrination. This follows the model of Soviet Russia with their “re-education camps.” Though the original language of this bill called the re-education/indoctrination centers “camps,” they have since changed the names to “campuses.”
  • “Service Corps”: The more I read, the more these look like the basis for the mobs/militias that Obama mentioned in his campaign, but quickly covered up. He said he would form a security force funded as well as the military. Every dictator and despot ruler has had the same thing: a paramilitary force to “persuade” citizens to bend to the will of the despot.
  • Backdoor attack on home schooling: The more I read, the more it becomes apparent that Obama intends to make attendance in public, government run schools mandatory. In recent years there have been increasing attacks on those who wish to home school their children in order to teach more conservative values to them. The communists/socialists have known for a long time that if you control the children, you will eventually bypass the parents and control the society.
  • Prohibition on any display or exercise of religion: Sect 125 (a)(7) reads thusly…

    ‘(a) Prohibited Activities- A participant in an approved national service position under this subtitle may not engage in the following activities:
    (7) Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of religious proselytization.

The only way they’ll take my kids to these camps is over my cold, dead body.

I’m uncovering more and more bad stuff in this bill. Please read as much of this, and every other bill, as you have the opportunity to read. Expose what our corrupt politicians are trying to keep in the dark.

Read HR1388 here:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1388/text

________________________________________________________________