Allen West: The case for impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama

While I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. West here, let us not forget that this willful breach of the law is just the latest in a long, long list of willful, knowing violations of the law, circumventing congress, taking power which the Constitution does not authorize him to have, and even aiding the enemies of the United States of America.  When compared to reasons other presidents have been impeached, Obama should have ALREADY been impeached a hundred times over.

Nixon was about to be impeached for his supporters breaking into the campaign offices of his opponent, but he at least was honorable enough to resign before the impeachment.  Clinton was impeached for lying about getting a blowjob in the oval office.  Obama has willfully directed his agencies to BREAK THE LAW, and in doing so has GOTTEN AMERICANS KILLED, and with the release of these high-ranking taliban members back into the cesspool, may lead to many more American deaths.  He has also cost America hundreds of billions of dollars because of his willful violations of our immigration laws, which is also circumventing both the legal and natural process for transforming our nation.

Barack Obama is without one shred of doubt a DOMESTIC ENEMY of America and our Constitution.  He MUST be removed AND imprisoned.  If congress won’t act to restore constitutional sanity to our government and nation (hard to imagine they will since they are also off their constitutional reservation), then Americans will be required to do it ourselves.  If that becomes the case, the president AND all of congress will be removed, and many of them jailed, or worse.  America is being pushed into a corner from which there are only two choices of escape.  Surrender and be a slave, or fight to restore the Constitution to its rightful place as THE rule of law in America.  It is now clearly the moment when we must choose our course.
+

---

The case for impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama

Written by Allen West on June 3, 2014

This morning on WMALs “Morning on the Mall” radio show with hosts Brian and Larry I was asked a simple question relating to the Taliban prisoner release and impeachment of the president. I responded yes that in this current case, the U.S. House of Representatives should file articles of impeachment against Barack Hussein Obama.

Now before all the detractors go apoplectic here, let me tell you about Article 2 signing statements, their intent, purpose, history, and usage, and the implications for the president’s impeachment.

President Obama used an Article 2 signing statement to deem unconstitutional a measure HE had signed into law contained in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The law stated that he must advise Congress within 30 days about any plans to transfer detainees from GITMO. Obama basically stated that this was “unconstitutional” and that his unilateral action fell within his purview. Once again Obama used selective discretion as to what law he feels he must adhere to — in this case it has severe ramifications for our national security.

Obama to allow UN to tax US for Green Climate Fund

In our form of government with 3 supposedly separate, but co-equal branches of government, isn’t it the purview of congress to levy taxes, the president to sign treaties, and the senate to approve those treaties?

So, the fact that Obama is about to commit to a treaty which allows a foreign entity to tax US citizens without the approval of the senate is wrong on several levels.

We are already way past the threshold for impeachable offenses. This one is just the icing on the cake.

---

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/report-un-tax-americans-green-climate-fund/237466

by Joel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
December 5, 2011 11:29am
+
President Obama’s team of negotiators at the United Nations Climate Change Conference may agree to a tax on foreign currency transactions, designed to pay for a “Green Climate Fund,” that would fall disproportionately on American travelers and businesses, according to a group attending the conference that is skeptical of the UN position on global warming.

Negotiators at the conference are considering “a new tax on every foreign currency transaction in the world,” according to the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT). “Every time you travel abroad, you’ll have to pay a climate tax,” explains CFACT, the group that released the “Climategate” emails. “More importantly, every time we import goods, every time we export our fine products (think jobs) we will do so with a climate tax skimming off the top.”

European countries would evade much of the tax burden, however, because “transactions within the Eurozone won’t have to pay this new tax.”

CFACT suggests that Obama is open to implementing this tax and similar policies in the absence of a full climate treaty, which would require congressional approval. “We have learned that while many have discounted this conference, knowing that a full climate treaty is difficult to achieve especially with a U.S. Senate that will not vote to ratify,” CFACT says. “Obama and his fellow climate travelers are working around the Senate and planning to stick America with the bill.”

---

Obama Signs Away YOUR Freedom and Sovereignty to Foreign Police Forces

Barack Obama is an enemy of the United States of America.  He is intentionally circumventing the United States constitution, which he swore to defend, destroying our economy and health care system, and he is doing all that he can to destroy our sovereignty as a nation.

This threat to the future well being of America must be stopped, and he must be stopped NOW.  Impeachment, legal proceedings on his background, whatever.

America won’t survive another year of Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

//////////////UPDATE: 29 Dec 2009, 1945 EST//////////////

Roger Hedgecock just put forth a theory that dovetails quite nicely with the pattern of subterfuge put forth by the Obama administration.  Roger theorized that the aim of this maneuver is to suborn our justice system to the international community so that G.W. Bush and Dick Cheney can be arrested and tried for war crimes.  Plausible.

//////////////UPDATE: 01 Jan 2010, 2130 EST//////////////

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/18445

The UN and Interpol How the UN will gain power

Cliff’s Notes:

• INTERPOL closely related to UN
• During Hitler’s time, Interpol was under the command of the SS.
• Cooperates with UN in “anti-crime areas”
  • UN decides what is or is not a crime
• Interpol is to be the police eyes and ears of the UN worldwide
  • Remember the Soviet KGB, anyone?
• Those who oppose climate change plans of the UN will be labeled as criminals
  • Anti-environmentalism is being called ‘terrorism’
  • UN says that anti-greens are acting against humanity!
• We are seeing the creation of a Marxist regime far greater than the Soviets or Chinese
• Why doesn’t Interpol investigate the CRU at East Anglia University, or other scientists about their fraud, or Greenpeace about its sabotage… or Obama and Brown taxing the people fraudulently?
  • Because Interpol is not genuine
• Interpol will work alongside the UN’s stormtroopers, as enforcers of UN laws and whims.  Watch for it, because it is bound to come.

---

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=120363

Obama gives foreign cops new police powers in U.S.

Sovereignty apparently set aside as agency exempted from law

Posted: December 28, 2009
8:57 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
WorldNetDaily

A little-discussed executive order from President Obama giving foreign cops new police powers in the United States by exempting them from such drudgery as compliance with the Freedom of Information Act is raising alarm among commentators who say INTERPOL already had most of the same privileges as diplomats.

At David Horowitz’s Newsreal, Michael van der Galien said the issue is Obama’s expansion of President Ronald Reagan’s order from 1983 that originally granted those diplomatic privileges.

Reagan’s order carried certain exemptions requiring that INTERPOL operations be subject to several U.S. laws such as the Freedom of Information Act. Obama, however, removed those restrictions in his Dec. 16 amendment to Executive Order 12425.

That means, van der Galien wrote today, “this foreign law enforcement organization can operate free of an important safeguard against government and abuse.”

“‘Property and assets,’ including the organization’s records, cannot be searched or seized. Their physical locations are now immune from U.S. legal or investigative authorities,” he wrote.

Obama’s order said he was removing the Reagan limitations on INTERPOL:

“AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES

“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, (who decides what “appropriate” privileges are?) exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them,” he wrote.

At the ThreatsWatch.org website, authors Steve Schippert and Clyde Middleton gave their interpretation of the result.

“In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama’s Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans’ 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves,” they wrote.

“When the paths on the road map converge – Iraq withdrawal, Guantánamo closure, perceived American image improved internationally, and an empowered INTERPOL in the United States – it is probable that President Barack Obama will once again make America a signatory to the International Criminal Court. It will be a move that surrenders American sovereignty to an international body whose INTERPOL enforcement arm has already been elevated above the Constitution and American domestic law enforcement,” they said.

“For an added and disturbing wrinkle, INTERPOL’s central operations office in the United States is within our own Justice Department offices. They are American law enforcement officers working under the aegis of INTERPOL within our own Justice Department. That they now operate with full diplomatic immunity and with ‘inviolable archives’ from within our own buildings should send red flags soaring into the clouds,” they said.

“Ultimately, a detailed verbal explanation is due the American public from the President of the United States detailing why an international law enforcement arm assisting a court we are not a signatory to has been elevated above our Constitution upon our soil.”

Records show that the original order designated INTERPOL as a public international organization. Reagan had extended “appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities,” but kept it subject to searches and seizures under appropriate legal circumstances.

Obama’s decision, analysts have concluded, exempted Interpol from all restrictions.

“This international law enforcement body now operates – now operates – on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests,” ThreatsWatch reported.

At the Patriot Room, it was explained there is a reason for a certain level of immunity.

“Before we get our knickers in a bunch, there is logic to this immunity. While we like our Constitution and laws, other countries like their Constitution and laws. It doesn’t matter if the concept of personal freedom is more expansive here. If we expect immunity in their country, we have to extend it to them here.”  (But if you don’t limit this immunity, you throw away your sovereignty.  When you are treated illegally, there is not recourse.)

But with Obama’s change, “It means that we have an international police force authorized to act within the United States that is no longer subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure.“

Anthony Martin at the Examiner noted the international agency now can operate in the U.S. will “full immunity” from U.S. laws and “with complete independence from oversight from the FBI.”

At National Review Andy McCarthy asked, “Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?“

At UNDispatch, which is a blog on the United Nations, Mark Leon Goldberg, who explained he worked at Interpol’s headquarters in France in 2002, said there isn’t much danger of INTERPOL agents whisking Americans off to jail. But he confirmed, “As to the specific reason why the Obama administration would decide, last week, to extend to INTERPOL the same suite of diplomatic privileges that are typically accorded to international organizations? I don’t have a good answer for that. My sense is that it probably has something to with the accessibility of INTERPOL’s secure criminal databases (on things like stolen passports and the like).”

But the Obama critics at the Obamafile weren’t convinced.

“By this EO, Obama has conferred diplomatic immunity upon INTERPOL, exemption from being subject to search and seizure by law enforcement, exemption from U.S. taxes, and immunity from FOIA requests, etc. … Does INTERPOL have a file on Obama – or his associations?”

---

To Senator Harry Reid: You Can’t Vote on Something That Doesn’t Exist

There’s fast and loose, then there’s downright unconstitutional.  That’s what we have here with the way Harry Reid and company are playing with the Baucus healthcare bill.  Excuse me, that’s healthcare NOTES.  There is no bill.  They plan to vote on a skeleton of a bill, then fill in the blanks with things that haven’t been approved AFTER THE “BILL” PASSES.  If that sounds to you like a recipe for raping taxpayers, usurping power, and destroying the country, then move to the head of the class.  They plan to fill this thing with all kinds of pork, and rules that will enslave us for generations to come.  We are so close to the edge of the abyss that each of us needs to be filling every e-mail inbox on Capitol Hill, running every fax machine out of paper with our faxes, and clogging every switch board with phone calls.  We can’t go down without a fight.

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

From:
October 09, 2009

To:    Senator Harry Reid
522 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Subject:  Voting on a Myth

Senator Reid,

I am writing to encourage you to stop the insane pursuit of government run healthcare in which you are currently engaged.  What you are doing by voting on legislation that does not yet exist, only to fill in the blanks later with secret pork, additional taxes, rules that destroy choice, destroy free enterprise, and confiscate American freedom is at the very least underhanded, and more likely unconstitutional.

Mr. Reid, I don’t recall seeing reports of you at town hall meetings this summer listening to your constituents air their displeasure with the performance and policies of you and your colleagues.  Maybe your meetings just didn’t get covered, or perhaps you were like many of your colleagues who didn’t have the courage to face the people who elected you.  The message that you apparently did not hear is that Americans, even those from your home state of Nevada, are tired of not being listened to by those who are supposed to represent us.  We do not want LESS freedom and MORE government.  We do not want less choice.  We do not want higher taxes.  We simply do not want what you are trying to shove down our throats.  WE DO NOT WANT HEALTHCARE REFORM IN THE FORM YOU ARE TRYING TO IMPLEMENT IT!

We all agree that healthcare costs are high, and that these costs need to be addressed.  But the approach of having MORE involvement of an inefficient government who takes away our choice, raises our taxes, and reduces the quality and availability of healthcare IS NOT the choice Americans want.  We want the choice that REMOVES government control, reforms the legal system, and increases competition without the government.  Many of you in Washington these days are trial lawyers, and are beholden to that special interest group.  That is why you refuse to address the abuses of that group.

Mr. Reid, you, your colleagues, and Mr. Obama are dividing America and driving this country to a point where Americans will no longer tolerate your foolishness and tyrannical behavior.  You are driving us to a point where our backs are against the wall and we will be forced to extreme measures to ensure the survival of our nation.  I will remind you of the words of our Declaration of Independence:

“…We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. … “

Mr. Reid, you have reached that point.

Sincerely,

///SIGNED///

Citizen

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

The Senate and House of Representative of the United States are Hereby Evicted

The bums aren’t listening, so it’s (past) time to throw them out.  There might be 10% of the elected officials in Washington who have voted faithfully in line with the constitution and American values, but the rest are merely the flotsam and jetsam of the American political scene.  For them to simply be swept away with the tide would be a good thing for America.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

http://www.americanvision.com/sendanevictionnoticetocongress.aspx

EVICTION NOTICE

On the following grounds I serve notice that you, the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, are hereby EVICTED.

• You have broken your contract with America by violating your oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States by expanding the powers of the Government in exchange for our God-given Liberties.
• You have ignored the pleas of the majority of Americans by forcing a takeover of our private health care industry and exchanging it for a bureaucratic nightmare.
• You are attempting to control our economy by empowering “Pay Czars” to regulate the income of workers.
• You are increasing taxes on small business owners, the life blood of our free economy, while bailing out the banking industry.
• You are overstepping your Constitutional Boundaries by agreeing with this present Administration to seize control of private industries, such as banking, automobile manufacturing, and health care.
• You have jeopardized the international value of our currency with deficit spending.
• You have failed to secure our national defense by refusing to tap the vast natural resources within our own borders and off our own shores.
• You have punished citizens and private business establishments with further regulation with hysteria and false claims of “climate change”.
• You have borrowed against our children’s future for political gain today

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Impeach Obama

This is just one example of the tide that is rising against the Dear Leader, Chairman Maobama, the Usurper.  I don’t think it has a possibility of success until we remove a bunch of the demo-rats from office next November.

Stopping Obama and the Democrats from destroying America and her way of life is every citizens responsibility.  Each of us is a drop in the bucket that can come together to put out this fire of communism, socialism, and oppression that has been set by the arsonists of the left to burn down America as we know it.  You can’t sit back and wait for others to act for you.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

If you wish to add your name to the petition supporting this movement, click on the link below:

https://fs7.formsite.com/C4Strategies/form532157721/secure_index.html

Resolved, that Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate:

Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people of the United States of America, against Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Article I

In his conduct while President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has:

unlawfully exercised the authority of his office to take private property for public use in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees to the People that “private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation,” and without “due process of law”; unlawfully interfered with the management of private companies for the purpose of achieving government control of them, in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. unlawfully interfered with the economic rights of the People by imposing unreasonable impairments in the fulfillment of their intended contractual obligations, and their ability to enter into such contracts, and attempting to change our fundamental economic system, where there is no significant or legitimate public purpose to do so.

In doing this, Barack Hussein Obama has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore, Barack Hussein Obama, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.

Article II

In his conduct while President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, and to that end, through his subordinates and agents, has:

unlawfully engaged in a conspiracy to suppress evidence of the true place of his birth. This obstruction of justice has resulted in a violation of the Constitutional provision that a President of the United States must be a natural born citizen. unlawfully refused his assent to the Laws of the United States, and exercised false powers of veto that are contrary to Constitution.

In all of this, Barack Hussein Obama has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore, Barack Hussein Obama, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.