• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    December 2009
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov   Jan »
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Orville on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Desi Chinese on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Oto ekspertiz Kaç li… on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Al Dajjal (@AlDajjal… on Where are the “Moderate…
    esgort on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
  • Archives

  • Advertisements

Obama Signs Away YOUR Freedom and Sovereignty to Foreign Police Forces

Barack Obama is an enemy of the United States of America.  He is intentionally circumventing the United States constitution, which he swore to defend, destroying our economy and health care system, and he is doing all that he can to destroy our sovereignty as a nation.

This threat to the future well being of America must be stopped, and he must be stopped NOW.  Impeachment, legal proceedings on his background, whatever.

America won’t survive another year of Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

//////////////UPDATE: 29 Dec 2009, 1945 EST//////////////

Roger Hedgecock just put forth a theory that dovetails quite nicely with the pattern of subterfuge put forth by the Obama administration.  Roger theorized that the aim of this maneuver is to suborn our justice system to the international community so that G.W. Bush and Dick Cheney can be arrested and tried for war crimes.  Plausible.

//////////////UPDATE: 01 Jan 2010, 2130 EST//////////////


The UN and Interpol How the UN will gain power

Cliff’s Notes:

  • INTERPOL closely related to UN
  • During Hitler’s time, Interpol was under the command of the SS.
  • Cooperates with UN in “anti-crime areas”
    • UN decides what is or is not a crime
  • Interpol is to be the police eyes and ears of the UN worldwide
    • Remember the Soviet KGB, anyone?
  • Those who oppose climate change plans of the UN will be labeled as criminals
    • Anti-environmentalism is being called ‘terrorism’
    • UN says that anti-greens are acting against humanity!
  • We are seeing the creation of a Marxist regime far greater than the Soviets or Chinese
  • Why doesn’t Interpol investigate the CRU at East Anglia University, or other scientists about their fraud, or Greenpeace about its sabotage… or Obama and Brown taxing the people fraudulently?
    • Because Interpol is not genuine
  • Interpol will work alongside the UN’s stormtroopers, as enforcers of UN laws and whims.  Watch for it, because it is bound to come.


Obama gives foreign cops new police powers in U.S.

Sovereignty apparently set aside as agency exempted from law

Posted: December 28, 2009
8:57 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh

A little-discussed executive order from President Obama giving foreign cops new police powers in the United States by exempting them from such drudgery as compliance with the Freedom of Information Act is raising alarm among commentators who say INTERPOL already had most of the same privileges as diplomats.

At David Horowitz’s Newsreal, Michael van der Galien said the issue is Obama’s expansion of President Ronald Reagan’s order from 1983 that originally granted those diplomatic privileges.

Reagan’s order carried certain exemptions requiring that INTERPOL operations be subject to several U.S. laws such as the Freedom of Information Act. Obama, however, removed those restrictions in his Dec. 16 amendment to Executive Order 12425.

That means, van der Galien wrote today, “this foreign law enforcement organization can operate free of an important safeguard against government and abuse.”

“‘Property and assets,’ including the organization’s records, cannot be searched or seized. Their physical locations are now immune from U.S. legal or investigative authorities,” he wrote.

Obama’s order said he was removing the Reagan limitations on INTERPOL:


“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, (who decides what “appropriate” privileges are?) exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them,” he wrote.

At the ThreatsWatch.org website, authors Steve Schippert and Clyde Middleton gave their interpretation of the result.

“In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama’s Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans’ 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves,” they wrote.

“When the paths on the road map converge – Iraq withdrawal, Guantánamo closure, perceived American image improved internationally, and an empowered INTERPOL in the United States – it is probable that President Barack Obama will once again make America a signatory to the International Criminal Court. It will be a move that surrenders American sovereignty to an international body whose INTERPOL enforcement arm has already been elevated above the Constitution and American domestic law enforcement,” they said.

“For an added and disturbing wrinkle, INTERPOL’s central operations office in the United States is within our own Justice Department offices. They are American law enforcement officers working under the aegis of INTERPOL within our own Justice Department. That they now operate with full diplomatic immunity and with ‘inviolable archives’ from within our own buildings should send red flags soaring into the clouds,” they said.

“Ultimately, a detailed verbal explanation is due the American public from the President of the United States detailing why an international law enforcement arm assisting a court we are not a signatory to has been elevated above our Constitution upon our soil.

Records show that the original order designated INTERPOL as a public international organization. Reagan had extended “appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities,” but kept it subject to searches and seizures under appropriate legal circumstances.

Obama’s decision, analysts have concluded, exempted Interpol from all restrictions.

“This international law enforcement body now operates – now operateson American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests,” ThreatsWatch reported.

At the Patriot Room, it was explained there is a reason for a certain level of immunity.

“Before we get our knickers in a bunch, there is logic to this immunity. While we like our Constitution and laws, other countries like their Constitution and laws. It doesn’t matter if the concept of personal freedom is more expansive here. If we expect immunity in their country, we have to extend it to them here.”  (But if you don’t limit this immunity, you throw away your sovereignty.  When you are treated illegally, there is not recourse.)

But with Obama’s change, “It means that we have an international police force authorized to act within the United States that is no longer subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure.

Anthony Martin at the Examiner noted the international agency now can operate in the U.S. will “full immunity” from U.S. laws and “with complete independence from oversight from the FBI.”

At National Review Andy McCarthy asked, “Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?

At UNDispatch, which is a blog on the United Nations, Mark Leon Goldberg, who explained he worked at Interpol’s headquarters in France in 2002, said there isn’t much danger of INTERPOL agents whisking Americans off to jail. But he confirmed, “As to the specific reason why the Obama administration would decide, last week, to extend to INTERPOL the same suite of diplomatic privileges that are typically accorded to international organizations? I don’t have a good answer for that. My sense is that it probably has something to with the accessibility of INTERPOL’s secure criminal databases (on things like stolen passports and the like).”

But the Obama critics at the Obamafile weren’t convinced.

“By this EO, Obama has conferred diplomatic immunity upon INTERPOL, exemption from being subject to search and seizure by law enforcement, exemption from U.S. taxes, and immunity from FOIA requests, etc. … Does INTERPOL have a file on Obama – or his associations?

4 Responses

  1. I have a question. Would the citizens of the great state of Texas stand by while a foreign police force entered Texas soil and dragged away one of her native sons?

    If this could happen in my country, stop the world, I want off.

  2. At the rate we’re going, it just might happen. Texas and Montana are the last two places I think it would happen without a fight. Make no mistake about the fact that Obama and all of the liberals are working around the clock to eliminate our sovereignty and your freedom. When they are distracting you with one hand, the other is taking away a freedom you are not watching, in a manner you are not expecting. They ARE pushing to eliminate gun ownership. They ARE pushing to eliminate capitalism and the middle class. They ARE trying to erect the framework for a socialist state, an oligarchy. At the rate they are succeeding in getting what they want, I fear the worst in terms of what it will take for us to save/regain our country. But I am willing to fight whatever fight needs to be fought, and I will stand side by side with any American willing to fight it with me. I will not die telling my children that I did nothing to try to save their future.

  3. They’re probably reading all the e-mails.

  4. Look up google for Hardin, Mt. a Police State.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: