Trying to Put a Pretty Face On an Ugly Party

Tulsi Gabbard on Tucker Carlson

“We, as the American people, should be concerned when any president of the United States launches an illegal and unconstitutional military strike against a foreign government.  This is something congress has not authorized, and it’s an escalation of a counterproductive regime-change war in Syria that our country has been waging for years.  First for many years through the CIA covertly, and now overtly through President Trump’s reckless military strike last night.” –Tulsi Gabbard, Democrat (HI)

While I am still not so sure that striking Syria at this time was such a good idea, I am sure that the democrat response, and specifically the response of Tulsi Gabbard who seems to represent the views of most democrats on this issue, is one of outright hypocrisy.  Despite her relatively attractive external appearance, she is just as dark and intellectually bankrupt on the inside as the rest of the democrat party.

Perhaps you remember one Barack Hussein Obama committing US forces to combat in Libya to support rebels seeking to overthrow the government of Libya.  There was no legitimate US interest in overthrowing Muammar Gaddafi, who had kept to himself since nearly being killed by Ronald Reagan in Operation El Dorado Canyon, and in fact had actually been cooperating with us by providing intelligence on terrorist organizations and activities.  Yet Barack Obama sided with the rebels seeking to overthrow Gaddafi, violating the War Powers Act by not receiving approval from congress within the required time, or at all.  In doing so, Obama fanned the flames of what came to be known as the “Arab Spring,” which ultimately destabilized the ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST, and created what became ISIS.

In Gabbard’s revised history, did she or the democrats say the American people should have been concerned when Barack Obama launched an illegal and unconstitutional military strike against a foreign government?  No.  No, they did not.  In fact, she completely left out Obama’s and the democrats involvement in destabilizing the middle east, and waging a war to overthrow Bashar Assad, who was of no threat to America.

There are a number of reasons why striking Syria right now may not have been the best idea.  There is the possibility Russia may have been responsible for the chemical weapon strike instead of Syria.  If the Syrians performed the strike, why did they have chemical weapons at all, since Obama supposedly arranged for Russia to take all of Syria’s chemical weapons in a brokered deal following Obama’s multiple “red lines” which he never enforced.  Shouldn’t Russia have to answer these questions?  Then there is the possibility that we could have accidentally hit the Russians in Syria, leading to war between us and Russia, which we are not prepared for.

So many reasons NOT to strike Syria.  But we did strike them, and in doing so have ONCE AGAIN exposed the intellectual dishonesty of the democrat party, and the liberal left in America.
+



+

Rep. Gabbard: Syria missile strike ‘illegal and unconstitutional’

Published April 07, 2017

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, told Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight” Friday that the American missile strike on a Syrian airfield as “an illegal and unconstitutional military strike” that drew the United States closer to military conflict with Russia.
Gabbard, an Iraq War veteran, also said the strike was “an escalation of a counterproductive regime change war in Syria that our country’s been waging for years, first through the CIA covertly, and now overtly.”
FLASHBACK: GABBARD SAYS SHE MET WITH ASSAD DURING SYRIA TRIP
In January, Gabbard met with Syrian President Bashar Assad in Damascus. When host Tucker Carlson asked if she believed Assad’s forces to be responsible for the chemical weapons attack that precipitated the missile strikes, Gabbard answered, “It doesn’t matter what I believe or not. What matters is evidence and facts.
“If the Trump administration has the evidence, unequivocally proving this, then share it with the American people,” Gabbard continued. “Share it with Congress. Come to Congress and make your case before launching an unauthorized, illegal military strike against a foreign government.
“Gabbard also said that efforts to overthrow Assad would only strengthen extremist groups, and expressed concerns about Moscow’s response to the missile strikes.
“Russia … are very closely allied with Syria and … have their own military operating [on] the ground there,” the congresswoman said, “and when you consider the consequences of that, the United States and Russia being the two nuclear powers in the world, it should be a cause of great concern for everyone.”

‘A Subtle Message to ISIS’ From a Ticked Off Military Veteran

May I add a few things to this most excellent letter?

You inbred, goat-banging, child-molesting, pedophilic, homosexual, barbaric followers of a satanic, pedophilic, lying sack of crap “prophet” need to listen, and listen clearly. Your bluster may anger us, but it doesn’t scare us. You act tough when you can anonymously behead a defenseless man, rape and/or stone a defenseless woman, molest defenseless children and livestock, all while hiding your cowardly faces behind your masks. When faced with the soul-takers whom you KNOW you will face if you choose to pursue your threats against us, you will wet you pants and scream for mercy like you have always done. When you were having goat-banging parties with your buddies, and some terrorist recruited you into this satanic cult with the promise of 72 virgins, you were too stupid to understand how easy you are to manipulate when you are desperate enough to bang a goat. You are going to be terribly disappointed to find out what “paradise” REALLY will be for you, and what the 72 “virgins” are going to be like. My money is on 72 virgin rabid wild boar pigs. Have fun with that. We’ll arrange the meeting as soon as possible.


‘A Subtle Message to ISIS’ From a Ticked Off Military Veteran Should Send a Chill Down the Spine of Every Terrorist

ISIS Leader to USA: ‘Soon We Will be in Direct Confrontation’

It’s time to arrest and jail the muslim-in-chief, round up the rest of his Marxist-Alinskyite buddies, and start playing cowboys and muslims. Is-lame is incompatible with civilization, especially ours, and Obama is doing everything he can to surrender America to it. You CAN’T tolerate an ideology within your borders that has sworn to subjugate and kill you. Thus we are left with two choices. Expel them from our borders and let the rest of the world deal with them, or combat them like the mortal enemy that they are. Us or them, to the death. I choose US. But we MUST acknowledge that the ideology of islam IS our enemy.
+


+

ISIS Leader to USA: ‘Soon We Will be in Direct Confrontation’

June 13, 2014 – 11:54 AM
Abu Bakr al Baghdadi

Abu Bakr al Baghdadi (Photo/Iraqi Ministry of Interior)

(CNSNews.com) – Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), issued a rare audio message back on January 21 in which he flatly stated his group’s intention to march on Baghdad and move into “direct confrontation” with the United States.

“Our last message is to the Americans. Soon we will be in direct confrontation, and the sons of Islam have prepared for such a day,” Baghdadi said. “So watch, for we are with you, watching.” Continue reading

Matt Walsh’s letter calling out Obama as a liar is one of the best you’ll read any time soon

The sooner we as Americans drop the chains and false pretenses of political correctness, and start boldly calling things what they really are, the sooner we can point America in the right direction again. Matt Walsh does a fantastic job of that in this letter.



Dear Mr. Obama,

Congratulations on getting 7.1 million people enrolled in Obamacare before the March 31st deadline!

Not to muddy the festivities by harping on technicalities, but I thought I’d pass along just a few corrections, in case you plan on giving anymore speeches or anything:

Alright, by ‘March 31st’ you mean ‘sometime in April,’ and by ‘deadline’ you mean‘suggestion which is subject to change.’

And, obviously, by ‘enrolled’ you mean ‘people who have filled some information out on a website.’

And by ’7.1 million’ you mean ‘probably like 858 thousand or something.’

In your speech on Tuesday, when you said that Obamacare is ‘the law’ and ‘it’s here to stay,’ you really meant that Obamacare is ‘a fluid and constantly adjusted set of unconstitutional decrees, which can be imposed or withdrawn by the Executive Branch at any point, for any reason, up to 21 times and counting.’ And by ‘here to stay,’you actually meant to say that ‘most of it is neither here nor staying, because you don’t want America to feel the full brunt of it until after the midterm elections.’

You claimed that ‘more than 3 million young adults have gained insurance’ by staying on their parents’ plan. Even if that were true, it seems to take for granted that there’s anything remotely positive about the government forcing insurance companies to treat 25-year-old men and women like children. But, more importantly, it isn’t.

Indeed, when you said ‘more than 3 million,’ you really meant ‘extrapolations based on faulty estimates conjured up by Health and Human Services almost two years ago have brought us to the dubious conclusion that we can claim 3 million, because nobody will understand how we arrived at that figure, and most everyone will be too lazy to even attempt to check our numbers.’

You appeared to venture into the vicinity of truth when you stated that Obamacare is‘doing what it’s supposed to do,‘ but then you forgot to stipulate what, precisely, that happens to be.

It has not, nor was it meant to, make insurance cheaper and more accessible – but it has stripped away choice and freedom, and made more people dependent on the government.

It has forced single men and elderly couples and nuns to pay for maternity care and birth control. Likewise, it has compelled everyone to purchase coverage for psychiatric illness and drug addiction treatment, even if we aren’t necessarily psychiatrically ill or addicted to drugs (though, with your help, the pharmaceutical industry will soon get us all under one or both of those umbrellas).

And, while you spiked the football in the Rose Garden, you still failed to indicate how many people have purchased and paid for a plan, as opposed to just checking some boxes. And you forgot to tell us how many of the Obamacare ’enrollees’ were only inclined to enroll in Obamacare because your law forced them off of their original plans.

You celebrated a ‘law’ that will supposedly ’insure the uninsurable,’ even though most of the people now insured by Obamacare aren’t actually yet insured, but they were insured before Obamacare made them uninsured under their original insurance.

Of course, this is all after you famously told us we can ‘keep our plans’ if we ‘like them,’while omitting that by ‘keep’ you meant ‘watch as it is demolished in front of our eyes,’and when you said ‘like’ you didn’t include the disclaimer that we’d all be legally obligated to adjust our affections in the direction of the type of plan you think we should like.

Whew. My head is spinning.

You’re a slippery one, Mr. Obama.

I feel like I’m beginning to learn your language, although I haven’t deciphered the entire code. I do know that, essentially, when you say a certain thing, what you really mean is anything but the thing you just said.

Honestly, I’m starting to think that you’re doing this on purpose.

I’m starting to think that you’re… lying.

You’re a liar.

Yes, that explains it. You’re either enormously inaccurate and oblivious in ways that just so happen to suit your political goals, or you’re a scheming, conniving liar.

I’m going with the latter. You lie. That’s all you do. You’re a liar.

I know, in this day and age of ‘civil discourse,’ we aren’t allowed use words like ‘liar’ anymore. It’s such a harsh and startling term. It upsets people. It makes them sad. It makes them feel all icky inside. But, Lord forgive me, I’d rather call a spade a spade and a liar a liar — as opposed to your strategy, which is to call a spade a tortoise, or an apple, or a three toed sloth, or anything but a spade.

I would label you pathological — as deception seems to drip like putrid sewage from every single word and phrase that escapes your lips — but I know your lies are calculated, not compulsive. You can’t be a pathological liar for the same reason that an effective diamond thief can’t be a kleptomaniac. Your lie, like his heist, requires careful planning and plotting. You’re very aware of the truth, which is what makes you so adept at avoiding it.

Still, I’d like to, for your sake, take you seriously on one count.

In your speech, you said this:

“I’ve got to admit, I don’t get it. Why are folks working so hard for people not to have health insurance? Why are they so mad about the idea of folks having health insurance?”

Why are folks mad at you? Well, as you’ve pointed out in the past, it’s probably because you’re black.

Yeah, that’s gotta be part of it. I’m sure cancer patients would be excited about having their plans abolished and their out-of-pocket expenses skyrocket, if only it had come at the hands of a white dude.

But, beneath the racism, maybe there’s something deeper going on.

Maybe, Mr. Obama, we’re all just tired of the lies.

Maybe we’re mad because you used the IRS against your political opponents, and lied about it. And you spied on everyone’s phone records (after specifically condemning that sort of practice), and lied about it. And you sent your Justice Department after journalists and whistleblowers, and lied about it. And you funneled weapons to drug cartels and terrorists, and lied about it. And you assassinated American citizens and drone bombed hundreds of innocent civilians, and lied about it. And you filled your administration with lobbyists, and lied about it. And you armed a terrorist insurrection in Libya, then orchestrated a cover-up once the terrorists murdered our ambassador, and lied about it. And, in general — whether it’s wiretapping, or Guantanamo, or deficit spending, or Obamacare, or whatever else – we’ve seen you do everything you said you wouldn’t, and little of what you said you would.

We’ve heard you lie. Over. And over. And over. And over again.

Maybe that’s why folks are so mad.

Maybe you’re a liar, and we know it.

And so do you.

I hope this helps clear up your confusion.

Sincerely,

Matt Walsh

LINK to article: http://youngcons.com/matt-walshs-letter-to-obama-calling-him-out-as-a-liar-is-the-best-thing-youll-read-for-a-while/


Obama: “Waaaaah! They’re picking on me! Everything is all THEIR fault!”

Mr. Obama, did Fox News force you to pass Obamacare? Did Rush Limbaugh force you to support terrorists in the middle east? Did conservatives force you to allow the NSA to spy on Americans? Did Sean Hannity force you to violate your constitutional duty to enforce ALL laws, not just the ones you like? Did Bill O’Reilly force you to exceed your constitutional authority, changing laws without the involvement of congress? Were all the people who voted for you twice ‘cool’ then, but somehow ‘RACIST™!’ because they don’t like you now?

What a megalomaniacal, self aggrandizing, narcissistic ass. Get over yourself.


Obama Blames Conservative Media, Limbaugh and Fox News For Failures…Again

Katie Pavlich | Jan 24, 2014

Earlier this week in the New Yorker, President Obama suggested his approval ratings are down because America is full of racists (the same racists who elected him, twice). Now, bonus excerpts from the same article by David Remnick show President Obama blaming his failures on Fox News while accusing the network, conservative media and Rush Limbaugh of turning him into a “caricature.” Continue reading

Doctor Obamastein

John McCain is nothing more than a progressive yes-man for Obama. He left his sanity, and his integrity in Hanoi. Maybe since we are supposed to be “friends” with the Vietnamese now, he could ask them to give it back.



Dr Obamastein

TSA and Homeland Security Waiting for Terrorists to Tell Them What to Look For

It’s not just the Obama administration that is incompetent, although Janet Napoli-Reno is setting new standards for incompetence.  Bush and Clinton before Obama were all soft on terrorists BECAUSE OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

Rather than be proactive and take the steps necessary to protect Americans, we tie our own hands for fear that we might offend someone.

So what do we do?  Let’s cut right to the chase.  PROFILING.  Contrary to what the linguine-spine liberals will have you believe, profiling is a VALID LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUE.

If you added up all the factors that screeners SHOULD be looking at (country of origin, one way ticket paid for in cash,  questionable identification, being on a watch list (which should be a “no fly” list), etc.), do you think the Crotch Bomber (Great Balls of Fire!) would have been allowed to get on that airplane?

Let’s take a quiz.

1) Someone robs a 7-11 and shoots the store clerk before fleeing on foot.  Three eyewitnesses describe the perpetrator as a Hispanic male, approximately 5’9″ tall, close cropped hair, wearing jeans and a green jacket.  As a police officer who receives this description you will look for, stop, and question:

a) 80-year old blue haired Anglo-Saxon women, to demonstrate you are not biased towards Hispanics.

b) Americans of African descent, missing their right legs, riding in wheel chairs to demonstrate that you are not singling out Hispanics as criminals.

c) Hispanic males, approximately 5’9″ tall, close cropped hair, because they fit the description of the perpetrator.

2) You are a TSA employee screening passengers at the airport.  You have an X-ray machine and a hand-held metal detector.  You are given intelligence information by your superiors that a middle eastern muslim group is planning on trying to bring down a plane with some kind of explosive.  The smart thing to do is:

a) Strip search 80-year old blue haired Anglo-Saxon grandmothers to demonstrate that we are not singling out muslims or racially profiling.

b) Strip search caucasian males of Irish and/or Italian descent because there’s a high probability that they have recently converted to islam and pose a threat to innocent civilians.

c) Strip search the males of middle eastern descent while watching all other passengers for odd behavior or strange things in their luggage.  You do this because every attack on an airline in the past 30 years has been by a muslim male of middle eastern or African descent, so you are playing the odds to multiply the effectiveness of the resources you have on hand to combat the threat.

If you answered anything other than “C,” you may be mentally retarded.  Consider having yourself evaluated.

The Israelis have used profiling to screen their airline passengers forever.  When is the last time you heard of an Israeli airliner being hijacked?  Profiling is not evil.  It is merely a tool if used properly.

When is use of profiling improper? When you use it to punish all persons of a given race for no other reason than they happen to be of that race.  But then it’s no longer profiling.  It’s RACISM.  Liberals would have you believe that the two are one and the same when they in fact are not.

Yet another fallacy of liberalism exposed.  It’s been a good day.


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=35037

Ivana Trump Escorted Off Plane: Napolitano Declares ‘The System Worked’

by Ann Coulter
12/30/2009

In response to a Nigerian Muslim trying to blow up a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas Day, the government will now prohibit international travelers from going to the bathroom in the last hour before the plane lands.

Terrorists who plan to bomb planes during the first seven hours of the eight-hour flight, however, should face no difficulties, provided they wait until after the complimentary beverage service has been concluded.

How do they know Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab didn’t wait until the end of the flight to try to detonate explosives because he heard the stewardess announce that the food service was over and seats would have to be placed in their upright position? I can’t finish my snack? This plane is going down!

Also prohibited in the last hour of international flights will be: blankets, pillows, computers and in-flight entertainment. Another triumph in Janet Napolitano’s “Let’s stay one step behind the terrorists” policy!

For the past eight years, approximately 2 million Americans a day have been subjected to humiliating searches at airport security checkpoints, forced to remove their shoes and jackets, to open their computers, and to remove all liquids from their carry-on bags, except minuscule amounts in marked 3-ounce containers placed in Ziploc plastic bags — folding sandwich bags are verboten — among other indignities.

This, allegedly, was the price we had to pay for safe airplanes. The one security precaution the government refused to consider was to require extra screening for passengers who looked like the last three-dozen terrorists to attack airplanes.

Since Muslims took down Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, every attack on a commercial airliner has been committed by foreign-born Muslim men with the same hair color, eye color and skin color. Half of them have been named Mohammed.

An alien from the planet “Not Politically Correct” would have surveyed the situation after 9/11 and said: “You are at war with an enemy without uniforms, without morals, without a country and without a leader — but the one advantage you have is they all look alike. … What? … What did I say?”

The only advantage we have in a war with stateless terrorists was ruled out of order ab initio by political correctness.

And so, despite 5 trillion Americans opening laptops, surrendering lip gloss and drinking breast milk in airports day after day for the past eight years, the government still couldn’t stop a Nigerian Muslim from nearly blowing up a plane over Detroit on Christmas Day.

The “warning signs” exhibited by this particular passenger included the following:

His name was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

He’s Nigerian.

He’s a Muslim.

His name was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

He boarded a plane in Lagos, Nigeria.

He paid nearly $3,000 in cash for his ticket. (and it was a one way ticket)

He had no luggage.

His name was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

Two months ago, his father warned the U.S. that he was a radical Muslim and possibly dangerous.

If our security procedures can’t stop this guy, can’t we just dispense with those procedures altogether? What’s the point exactly?

(To be fair, the father’s warning might have been taken more seriously if he had not simultaneously asked for the U.S. Embassy’s Social Security number and bank routing number in order to convey a $28 million inheritance that was trapped in a Nigerian bank account.)

The warning from Abdulmutallab’s father put his son on some list, but not the “no fly” list. Apparently, it’s tougher to get on the “no fly” list than it was to get into Studio 54 in the ’70s. Currently, the only people on the “no fly” list” are the Blind Sheik and Sean Penn.

The government is like the drunk looking for his keys under a lamppost. Someone stops to help, and asks, “Is this where you lost them?” No, the drunk answers, but the light’s better here.

The government refuses to perform the only possibly effective security check — search Muslims — so instead it harasses infinitely compliant Americans. Will that help avert a terrorist attack? No, but the Americans don’t complain.

The only reason Abdulmutallab didn’t succeed in bringing down an airplane with 278 passengers was that: (1) A brave Dutchman leapt from his seat and extinguished the smoldering Nigerian; and (2) the Nigerian apparently didn’t have enough detonating fluid to cause a powerful explosion.

In addition to the no blanket, no computer, no bathroom rule, perhaps the airlines could add this to their preflight announcement about seat belts and emergency exits: “Should a passenger sitting near you attempt to detonate an explosive device, you may be called upon to render emergency assistance. Would you be willing to do so under those circumstances? If not we will assign you another seat …”


%d bloggers like this: