• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    December 2018
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov    
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    wearenegroes on Will Hillary Clinton Run Again…
    Al Dajjal (@AlDajjal… on Where are the “Moderate…
    IB on Why Gun Ownership is Biblical…
    NEW White House Insi… on Hitler and the muslim bro…
    who to write an Essa… on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
  • Archives

  • Advertisements

The Democrat “Green” Money Laundering Operation is Falling Apart

The continuous theft of our money for these “green” handouts is nothing more than a money laundering scheme.  Obama has poured BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars into an industry that is not commercially viable, all to payback his political supporters, and launder money to the democrat party.

Solyndra grabbed headlines, but has now faded as the “mainstream” media ignores the continuing story.  Oh, yes, there is more to the Solyndra bankruptcy.  They are now handing out millions of dollars in “bonuses” to their failed executives, funded by the taxpayer supplied bailout money.

Now the rate of “green” failures is accelerating, and with them accelerating the rate at which taxpayer money disappears with ABSOLUTELY NO BENEFIT TO THE TAXPAYERS FROM WHOM IT WAS STOLEN.

And no one is doing jack squat about it.  Isn’t socialism great? At least until you run out of other people’s money.  Have you seen our national debt which is accelerating like the Millennium Falcon?  To mix metaphors, we’re heading off into deep space where no one can hear us scream…



http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/01/27/drip-drip-drip-yet-another-green-energy-stimulus-recipient-hits-the-skids-the-third-this-week/

Drip, Drip, Drip: Yet Another Green Energy Stimulus Recipient Hits the Skids (the third this week!)

by William Yeatman on January 27, 2012

in Blog

Post image for Drip, Drip, Drip: Yet Another Green Energy Stimulus Recipient Hits the Skids (the third this week!)Earlier this week, Stimulus beneficiary Evergreen Energy bit the dust. Then, Ener1, a manufacturer of batteries for electric vehicles and recipient of Stimulus largesse, filed for bankruptcy. And today, the Las Vegas Sun reports that Amonix, Inc., a manufacturer of solar panels that received $5.9 million from the Porkulus, will cut two-thirds of its workforce, about 200 employees, only seven months after opening a factory in Nevada.

I foresaw this spate of bad news last November. As I explained yesterday,

In a previous post, I compared renewable energy spending in the 2009 Stimulus to a green albatross burdening the President. I argued that Stimulus spending was inherently wasteful, because politics invariably corrupts government’s investment decisions. The result is taxpayers losses on bankrupt companies that existed only by the grace of political favoritism, a la Solyndra. I predicted the green stimulus would haunt the President, in the form of a slow drip public relations nightmare, as a litany of bad investments go belly-up in the run up to the 2012 elections.

Mr. President, are you still sure you want to “double down” on renewable energy giveaways?

+


Advertisements

Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume

Well, this explains a lot.  Mostly it explains why Barry can’t seem to get ANYTHING right when it comes to the Constitution.

But if this is true, the much larger and darker question that no one seems willing to ask, who “created” Obama and got him elected?

 


http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/investigation-reveals-numerous-bogus-claims-on-obama-resume?render=print#print

 

Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume

In what is being called ‘the biggest hustle in human history,’ a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama’s resume, including the outright lie that he was a ‘Constitutional scholar and professor.’

The claim turns out to be false.

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

As investigators delve further into the background of Barack Obama, a disturbing picture is emerging of a man who is not who he claims to be.  The information the public has been told concerning Obama is turning out to be false–fabrications and inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that had clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the land.

According to a special report issued by ‘the Blogging Professor,’ the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama.  The report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a ‘constitutional professor and scholar,’ and that he never served as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the school.

The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an ‘instructor’ at Chicago Law School, not a professor.  Commonly, instructors are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.

In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors is below that of associate professors and professors because they lack the credentials.

In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history in higher education are a complete sham.  The President of the United States is a complete fraud.

According to Doug Ross:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Thus,  the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor of the Harvard Law Review a ‘put-up job’ as well, allowing the student to claim he held this prestigious position without having the qualifications or meeting the requirements of holding that position?  And why?

Further,

Consider this:

1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on his bar application.

2. Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993.

3. So, we have the President and First Lady – who don’t actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.

4. A senior lecturer is one thing. A fully ranked law professor is another. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, “Obama did NOT ‘hold the title’ of a University of Chicago law school professor”. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor” in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

These are highly disturbing facts, verified facts from the people who know at the Chicago Law School.

There is more from Ross, however:

6. “He did not hold the title of professor of law,” said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the U.S. Constitution recently during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video.

9. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal.”

10. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?

When you are a phony it’s hard to keep facts straight.

Obama has made sure that all of his records are sealed tight.  And apart from the courageous souls at the various educational institutions who dared to speak the truth, the schools Obama claimed to attend unanimously refuse to release transcripts, records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama’s presence in their institutions.

BREAKING DEVELOPMENTjust as these disturbing facts come to light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals with numerous ‘journalists,’ promising unprecedented access to the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain information ‘they may discover.’

 


 

Dems balk on budget, warn of tax hikes to come

This is so transparent as to be laughable. The democrats are just trying to postpone more bad news until after the election to limit their losses in November. Hoyer and other democrats have already said they are going to raise taxes, and it won’t just be on those making over $250,000 per year.

Remember in November.


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/congress/Dems-balk-on-budget_-warn-of-tax-hikes-to-come-96925354.html

Dems balk on budget, warn of tax hikes to come

By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent
June 23, 2010

As Senate Democrats were forced to consider scaling back their massive federal aid and stimulus package, House Democrats threw up the white flag on passing a budget this year, announcing instead they would consider a short-term proposal that cuts spending but does nothing to tackle future deficits. …

… skipping the budget process altogether, which Democrats were considering because it would have been impossible to come up with enough support within their divided caucus to produce what would have amounted to a five-year blueprint on spending and taxation.

Instead, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., announced Tuesday the House will duck the mounting deficit and consider a “budget enforcement resolution” that will make cuts in spending and set limits for 2011 only. Longer-term decisions, Hoyer said, would have to wait until the newly formed presidential debt commission issues its first report in December.

“It isn’t possible to debate and pass a realistic, long-term budget until we’ve considered the bipartisan commission’s deficit reduction plan,” Hoyer said in a speech delivered Tuesday to Third Way, a liberal think tank. Hoyer also warned of looming middle-class tax increases after this year. …

(Read complete article HERE)


Fight organized crime: Re-elect NO ONE!

In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a congress.  —John Adams

Van1Van2

%d bloggers like this: