Obama Has Actually Accomplished Quite a Lot in His Presidency. But That’s Not a Good Thing

---

---

Obama has actually accomplished quite a bit, and here’s a long list of his accomplishments, so stop bashing him, haters!

1. First President to be photographed smoking a joint.
2. First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
3. First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.
4. First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.
5. First President to violate the War Powers Act.
6. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
7. First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.
8. First President to spend a trillion dollars on “shovel-ready” jobs when there was no such thing as “shovel-ready” jobs.
9. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.
10. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
11. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.
12. First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
13. First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign.
14. First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space.
15. First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.
16. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
17. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
18. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases.
19. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.
20. First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
21. First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.
22. First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal).
23. First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
24. First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.
25. First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists.
26. First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office.
27. First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records.
28. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
29. First President to go on multiple “global apology tours” and concurrent “insult our friends” tours.
30. First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers.
31. First President to have personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.
32. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.
33. First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense.
34. First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.
35. First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona).
36. First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they “volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences.”
37. Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.

It’s hard to comprehend all this guy has gotten away with. Any other president would have been impeached during the first year of their presidency for what this tyrant has done! For what Obama has done in 5 years, ANY other president would have been arrested, tried for treason, and HUNG. What in God’s name is wrong with our government that they allow this guy carte blanch to break the law, rewrite and create laws without congress, and ignore and attack the Constitution? It absolutely boggles the mind!

What spawned such an evil man?  How about a communist-muslim loving mother who was into posing for pornographic pictures, a communist-muslim father (whether you believe the father is BO, Sr., or Frank Marshall Davis, the father was at least communist), communist grandparents, terrorist and communist friends and mentors?

Einstein actually explained how Obama’s background came together to form who he is.

(H/T patriotnewswire.com.  Most of this post comes from this article http://patriotnewswire.com/2015/02/stop-bashing-because-heres-a-list-of-obamas-accomplishments-haters/#, with a few additions and edits)

---

---

They ALL Read the SAME Book. Allah IS Satan, Video Explains

Yet ANOTHER moslem terror attack overnight.  This time in Denmark.  The cancer of islam is spreading rapidly.

The response of liberal-progressives and RINOs without a spine will be the usual.

“Lone wolf…”  “Radical moslem…”  “Don’t label ALL moslems…”  etc.

Rather than condemning the attacks, the response from moslems will also be predictable.

“Woe is us…”  “Racism…”  “We’re so picked on…”

Bullcrap.  They are using civilization against civilization, and lying to buy themselves the time needed to gain sufficient strength to conquer us.  They have done this throughout history, if you care to look it up.

There is no such thing as a “moderate” moslem.  The cancer is NOT “radical” islam, or a “perversion” of islam.  The cancer is islam itself.  You must define your terms when arguing this to the idiot left.  A “good” moslem to US is one who doesn’t kill people.  A “good” moslem to a moslem is one who follows the koran.  The koran tells moslems to kill infidels (i.e. you and me) wherever they find them.  A “bad” moslem to a moslem is one who doesn’t believe the koran as written, or who leaves the faith (apostate).  As I heard it said the other day…

“A radical moslem will cut off your head while the “moderate” moslem holds your ankles.”

MAKE NO MISTAKE.  The ideology that we MUST defeat is not “radical” islam, but islam itself.  ALL of it.  We must ban it from our civilized societies because it has demonstrated since it was invented by the murdering pedophile Mohammed that islam CAN’T and WON’T coexist with any other ideology.

I often quote Sir Karl Popper’s paradox of tolerance, and will do so again because it explains so well the paradox that a tolerant civilization MUST confront if it wishes to survive the onslaught of the intolerant.

Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.
–Sir Karl Popper, From The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton 1971

I will leave you with a video from Alfonso Rachel that explains all this very well.  We must eradicate islam from our midst, or we will not survive.  It is literally US or THEM.  I choose US.

Allah IS Satan, and HERE is the proof.

A Critical Look at the Koran

The article below is an excellent exposition on the koran, and what we MUST do to combat the ideology it preaches if we are to survive.  The evidence shows the koran to have been dreamed up entirely from the mind of a violent, lying pedophile, and foisted on unsuspecting followers who respected strength more than intelligence.  These followers now go beyond faith to blind adherence to the book, and act as though the god they follow isn’t strong enough to defend himself by killing ANYONE who disagrees with or disparages this ‘god.’  How do you combat such an ideology?  By proving the fallacy of it.
+

---

WILLIAM KILPATRICK

“May Allah accept this from me.”

“I’m doing it in the name of Allah.”

“To establish Islamic law—Allah’s law on earth.”

The above are statements made by would-be and successful jihadists to explain their motivations for planning or executing acts of terror in America. Jihadists in other parts of the world say much the same thing. Where, then, do they get the idea that this is what Allah wants them to do?

Jihadists usually cite the Koran as the source of their motivation. For example, Terry Lee Loewen explained his planned jihad attack on Wichita’s Mid-Continent Airport last December as follows:

I don’t understand how you can read the Qur’an and the sunnah of the Prophet and not understand that jihad and the implementation of Sharia is absolutely demanded of all the Muslim Ummah.

So how can we disabuse terrorists and potential terrorists of the notion that Allah wants them to kill infidels? The obvious place to start is with the Koran. We can’t say, however, that there is absolutely no warrant in the Koran for killing unbelievers, because there patently is. “When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them” (9:5) is typical of many similar verses. According to a content analysis conducted by the Center for the Study of Political Islam, 24 percent of the Medinan verses of the Koran are devoted to jihad. Or, as Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud once declared, “Allah on 480 occasions in the Holy Koran extols Muslims to wage jihad.”

Texas: Muslim killed daughter & her lesbian lover

The police say they are “still searching for a motive” in the killing, despite the koran in his room being open to a passage that dealt SPECIFICALLY with the situation.

We all know that had they found a Bible instead of a koran open to a passage about homosexuality, it would be “CASE CLOSED,” and it would be non-stop headlines about “homophobic Christian hate mongers.”

This crap is getting old.

---

Texas: Muslim killed daughter & her lesbian lover, left Koran open to verse condemning homosexuality

Posted on March 16, 2014 by creeping

via Texas dad killed daughter, her lesbian lover because he disliked that she was gay: mom – NY Daily News.

A Texas dad disgusted with his daughter’s lesbian lifestyle murdered the young woman and her lover, the girl’s mother said in a shocking twist to a gruesome case.

James Cosby, 46, bludgeoned his daughter Britney Cosby to death and shot her lover, Crystal Jackson, on March 6 before dumping the bodies near the ferry gate in Port Bolivar, Texas, police believe.

The bodies were found near a Dumpster around 7:30 a.m. the next day outside a Fisherman’s Cove food mart.

Both women were 24.

Britney’s mother told KHOU-TV that Cosby was angry his daughter was gay.

“He said it to me a few times that he did not like the idea of her being gay,” Loranda McDonald told the TV station. “But, like I told him, there’s nothing we could do about that. That’s who she is. We can’t change her lifestyle.”

How Thomas Jefferson Led America’s First “War On Terror”

The threat we face from Islam is not new.  It is a threat that is as evil today as it was when it was founded.  The only difference is that they have learned to battle us using our own system against us. If we can not name the threat, and acknowledge the threat for what it is, it will consume and destroy as.

+

---

May 5, 2013 by Tim Brown

Today, I hear a lot of cries for tolerance, especially of Islam. I’m told, “Stop the hating of Muslims.” Many of the very people I hear this from like to point to the Constitution and to the Founding Fathers and especially to the First Amendment and declare that Islam should be tolerated in America. However, I wonder if they have paid attention to either the Constitution or the Founding Fathers on this matter. Specifically, I wonder if they have even considered the words and actions of the third President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, especially his sense of reading their own texts from the Qur’an and knowing just what his enemies thought. Let’s take a stroll down memory lane, shall we?

Barbary Wars: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cM97XzQn9IQ&feature=player_embedded

First, keep in mind that Islam and terrorism have gone hand in hand since its inception at the beginning of the 7^th century. In fact, it’s founder Muhammad was a terrorist and used “religion” to band his merry men together to conquer, rape and pillage.

At War With Islam? Yes, Since… ALWAYS.

Are ALL muslims evil?  I don’t think so.  However, that depends on how closely they choose to follow the doctrine of their faith.  Is the ideology of islam evil?  Demonstrably so.

As Mr. Adams writes,

There certainly are “moderate Muslims”; they are friends, colleagues, acquaintances. They are our specialist doctors and our neighbors. Some may have even married into the family. But here’s the thing: they aren’t practicing their faith properly. Or they choose to emphasize other parts of the religion. Their, and our problem, is the lesson of Boston: a “moderate’ can be activated any time.

Having several instances of “peaceful/moderate” muslims who “became radicalized” both here and in the combat zones in which we are engaged, and having seen the principle of taqiyya (disguising one’s beliefs, intentions, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions or strategies to advance islam) in action, how is it possible to truly and completely trust someone who claims islam as their religion?
+

---

Written on Friday, May 3, 2013 by Nick Adams

It was the great poet T.S. Eliot who said, “April is the cruelest month.”

And so it was.

First, Islamic evil rocked the city of Boston, ripping hearts and limbs from innocents. And just when we thought it impossible, the tragedy of West struck. But there is no nation more resilient than the American one. History has proved this.

But now more than ever, everyday Americans must revisit history.

For it has never been clearer: the West is at war with Islam. This is neither hypothesis or opinion; it is reality. No delicacy, diplomacy, disguise or differentiation can alter this.

The media-academic complex, the West’s left and their doctrine of relativism is costing us lives. The Bible is not the same as the Koran. Sorry, global elitists, but all religions are not the same.

“Peaceful and Tolerant” Muslims Destroy Dozens of Churches in Tanzania

If we don’t stop the spread of “peaceful and tolerant” sharia law adherents in America, this is the kind of “peace and tolerance” we can expect in America.  Sharia is like a cancer.  It must be combated and eradicated, or it will spread until it kills the host.

Muslims keep complaining that they are being treated “unfairly,” or being persecuted.  Right.  Kind like the way a serial killer is persecuted by his victims.  If muslims don’t want to be treated like animals, they should quit acting like animals.  When someone says something one doesn’t agree with, or when someone insults your religion or belief system, CIVILIZED human beings express their displeasure in a CIVILIZED way.  They TELL the offender why that offends them, and work on a peaceful resolution.  On the other hand, when offended, an ANIMAL will whine like a rabid female dog with an inflamed vagina, and run around rioting and killing people.  RABID ANIMALS are to be exterminated.

If you wish to be treated like CIVILIZED HUMAN BEINGS instead of like RABID ANIMALS who need to be exterminated, then FREAKING ACT LIKE CIVILIZED HUMAN BEINGS.
+

---

Dozens of Churches Destroyed In Tanzania; East Africa Violence Spreading

Tuesday, November 13, 2012 (8:03 am)

DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA (Worthy News)– Dozens of Christian worship places have been destroyed by Islamic extremists in Tanzania and church leaders are fleeing its heavily Muslim island of Zanzibar, as the persecution of Christians spreads throughout East Africa, a human rights chief said Monday, November 12.

“As of May [about] 25 churches and convents have been destroyed. This destruction is mostly confined to [semi-autonomous] Zanzibar where the population is 99 percent Muslim and openly hostile to Christians,” explained William Stark, regional manager for Africa of advocacy group International Christian Concern (ICC)

In one of the latest just revealed incidents, violence broke out last month after a Muslim boy encouraged a Christian boy to urinate on a Koran, deemed a holy book by Muslims, on the outskirts of Dar es Salaam, the capital.

An Analogy about Islam

by BILL BOYCE

Imagine that we all live in the same neighborhood. Our particular neighborhood is spread out so that we can not see our neighbors homes (We all live in the country.) and we have trees growing between our properties.

Within that neighborhood there is an arsonist who has recently burnt down several of our neighbors homes, and in the process killed the entire family. Not all of our neighbors are aware that this has taken place.

Trying to be the good neighbor, and being sincerely concerned about the welfare and safety of the rest of our neighbors I take it upon myself to go and visit each and everyone of my neighbors to inform them of this Arsonist who has burnt down the homes and murdered innocent families.

As the Messenger, am I in anyway responsible for the actions of the Arsonist?

As the Messenger, should I be reprimanded, punished or otherwise criticized for merely being concerned about the health and safety of the rest of my neighbors?

As the Messenger, am I doing the right thing by taking it upon myself to inform the rest of my neighbors about this person who is burning down the homes in our neighborhood?

Now imagine that instead of a small neighborhood of houses we broaden the scope of this analogy to an entire country, or even countries!

I am only one of many messengers attempting to spread the FACTS and REALITY, no matter how harsh, about the heinous acts of Islam, and I do this not out of spite, nor anger, nor hatred.

I do this out of love… love of humankind, love of freedom to practice or not practice my own brand of spiritual/religious enlightenment that does not force itself upon others.

NO person, group or entity has the right to bully, and force at knife/bomb or gunpoint their own brand/type/kind of religion on any other person as does Islam!

Islam is that arsonist, and they are destroying neighborhoods on a global scale.

It is time for you, the average person who is only trying to raise your family and live your life, to stand up against the bully, tell them you have had enough and it needs to stop! The lives and livelihood of your sons and daughters require this of you!

They will not stop by ignoring them, or giving in to there demands.
They will not go away by burying your head in the dirt.

They will only go away by actions!

What actions?
I do not advocate using violence unless it is in defense of you or another person whom you believe is in imminent/immediate danger of losing life or limb!

1. Learn about Islam! Read a Koran, Read the Hadiths, Read the Sira and read about Sharia Law. Knowledge is the Key!!

2. Contact your local, city/town and state representatives and inform them you do not want Islam in or around your neighborhoods.

3. Do not allow them to block your streets with their aggressive praying. Have them removed by your local police or even the National Guard if required!

4. Educate yourself about what Islam is doing around the world! Almost all the major news agencies world wide will allow you to access their lead stories!

Please…. don’t shoot the messenger!

Stand up, stand united, or be prepared to bow down before the onslaught that is called “Islam”!

---

‘Caring’ Obama Has bin Laden on the Run. Yeah, right…

If he only cared as much about Americans as he does about the rest of the world.  Obama claims to be a Christian, yet he doesn’t act like one, never quotes the Bible except out of context when bashing his critics, often quotes the koran/quran/etc., and panders to muslims at the expense of Christians, Jews, and all Americans.

Mat 7:15-16  “Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves.  (16)  “You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?

If it walks like a duck (or thug “community organizer”)…

---

 

Published on NewsBusters.org (http://newsbusters.org)

NYT: ‘Caring’ Obama Has bin Laden on the Run

By Clay Waters

Created 2009-06-09 10:10

Message: Obama cares about Muslims. And he’s got Osama bin Laden on the run by wisely fighting the war not militarily, but ideologically, unlike George Bush.

That’s the bottom-line finding in Rod Nordland’s piece from Baghdad for the New York Times Sunday Week in Review  story on Obama’s speech to Muslims in Cairo, “Forceful Words and Fateful Realities [1].” Nordland portrayed Osama bin Laden’s taped rebuttal as a sign of his weakness.

Barack Obama’s speech in Cairo last Thursday was “soft spoken and eloquent,” said Moqtada al-Sadr, the radical Iraqi cleric, grudgingly, since he also said he despised it. It was a speech that meant different things to different people, a quality that has been much noted in this president. He supported Israel, but reached out to the Muslim world in an unprecedented way. Some friends were troubled, others reassured. Some of America’s enemies denounced it, but none dismissed it. Not even the arch-enemies at whom, in some important way, the speech was directed.

Just the day before, in fact, a pre-emptive audio tape attributed to Osama bin Laden [2] warned his followers not to trust whatever Mr. Obama would say. And as it turned out, his fear was justified. In the view of Fawaz Gerges, the president’s speech was above all else about the war on terror, a direct attack on Mr. bin Laden and the mindset he promulgates.

“Barack Obama is not just trying to reach out to Muslims for the sake of it,” says Mr. Gerges, a professor of Middle Eastern studies at Sarah Lawrence College and an authority on modern jihad. “He’s trying to hammer a deadly nail in Osama bin Laden’s message.” What President Obama understood more than his predecessors, Mr. Gerges says, is that it is not a war that can be won militarily, but only ideologically.

Jarret Brachman, a former West Point terrorism expert and author of a recent book, “Global Jihadism,” said the speech “was the most important strategic step we’ve taken in this war.”

“That’s why Al Qaeda is so nervous,” he said.

If the medium were the message, the contrasts could not have been more stark. The American president was polished and poised, his speech broadcast from the elegant surroundings of an ancient Arab university, and watched worldwide. Mr. bin Laden’s was on an audiotape, crackling and hard to hear, broadcast on Al Jazeera. “Osama bin Laden and Ayman Zawahiri have been reduced to a static voice on the radio, a static voice on TV and a static image and message,” Mr. Gerges says. “The message no longer resonates with Muslims the way it did in the late 90s and after 2001.”

The Times certainly never went out of its way to portray Osama bin Laden as on the run after a speech by President Bush.

Nordland buffed Obama’s image further:

Mr. Obama’s speech referenced the future, quoted from the three major monotheistic religions, and talked about a new beginning, all delivered with his customary calm. The two voices of Al Qaeda were strident, almost violently so, in their discourse.

Nordland put Obama in a favorable light, in comparison with the “Bush era.”

Spurned in much of its Arab heartland, Al Qaeda lately has shifted its attentions to Pakistan, where it still enjoys high approval ratings, bringing the suicide bomb to its old allies the Taliban. “It’s an easy thing to say that bin Laden is feeling increasingly marginalized, and support in the Mideast for Al Qaeda’s aims is at an all-time low, but new clusters of Arab militants are re-gathering in Pakistan,” Mr. Miller said. Significantly, Mr. bin Laden’s audio statement last week focused on Pakistan’s efforts, approved of by President Obama, to drive the Taliban out of Swat Valley, less than a day’s drive from Pakistan’s capital and its main nuclear research laboratories.

That’s worrisome, but not as much as it would have been in the Bush era, when 49 percent of Saudis told pollsters they admired their errant countryman, offers of marriage poured in to him, and Osama at one point was the first name of choice for newborn boys.

Nordland forwarded a lame anti-Bush joke, allegedly popular among Muslims, portraying Bush as a bloodthirsty Muslim hater, before concluding:

It is not the sort of joke that seems likely now to stick to Barack Obama; his Cairo speech may not succeed in changing the Middle East, but it will at least have persuaded many skeptical Muslims that he cared.

---

 

Source URL:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/clay-waters/2009/06/09/nyt-caring-obama-has-bin-laden-run

Links:
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/weekinreview/07nordland.html
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/world/middleeast/04binladen.html?ref=middleeast

Over 60 Per Cent of Britain’s Muslim Schools Have Extremist Links

Sadly, the British have lost the spine to stand up against the evils of radical islam. They will soon be dhimmi kafir’s (infidel servants) to radical muslims who have conquered them basically without firing a shot. The scourge of political correctness is leading us down the same road of destruction as (formerly) Great Britain, and will be our undoing unless we rediscover the spine and guts that once made our country the greatest on earth.

Demi comes from the muslim concept of dhimmi, which is the term used to describe any member of a non-muslim religion that is subjugated by islam. Dhimmis have no right to self-defense against any muslim for any reason and have no legal standing in a muslim court. Dhimmis are required to wear distinguishing clothing while in public, so that muslims can readily identify them as dhimmi, much as the Jews in Nazi-Germany were required to wear the distinguishing yellow Star of David so they, too, could be identified easily. New construction of dhimmi temples or churches is forbidden, and no repair to existing structures is allowed. This assures that temples and churches fall into such disrepair that they are no longer usable, and of course, they cannot be rebuilt.

Kaeffer is a homophone of the Arabic transliteration kafir, meaning ingrate or the more recognizable denigration: “infidel.”

---

Exclusive: over 60 per cent of Britain’s Muslim schools have extremist links, says draft report

Exclusive: over 60 per cent of Britain’s Muslim schools have extremist links, says draft report

Posted By: Damian Thompson at Dec 17, 2008 at 13:05:37 [General]

Britain’s Muslim schools have been sharply criticised in a controversial draft report commissioned by a leading think tank which suggests that over 60 per cent of them are linked to potentially dangerous Islamic fundamentalists.

An early version of the report, entitled When Worlds Collide, alleges that of the 133 Muslim primary and secondary schools it surveyed, 82 (61.6 per cent) have connections or direct affiliations to fundamentalists. The 133 schools are in the private sector but supposedly subject to Ofsted inspection.

The report also claims that some of these schools teach “repugnant” beliefs about the wickedness of Western society and Jews.

The claims in the report, written by Denis MacEoin in response to a commission from Civitas, will provoke ritual cries of “Islamophobia” from the Muslim Council of Britain and fellow travellers such as Koran Armstrong. MacEoin has been careful to back up his claims with evidence – in particular, screen captures of links to Islamic hate-mongers, including supporters of Al-Qaeda.

Civitas, however, is not prepared to endorse MacEoin’s 61.6 per cent figure, which will not appear in the published version of When Worlds Collide. A spokesman for Civitas explains: “We want to concentrate on claims that are absolutely robust, rather than complicated material, some of it in Arabic, that might unjustly damage someone’s reputation.”

Perhaps the most alarming finding of the draft I’ve seen is that so many of these schools (including ones with no connections to political extremism) are bricking up their pupils behind a wall of Koranic injunctions and Sharia law.

The schools known as Darul Ulooms, which base their curriculum on a seventeenth-century Indian teaching system, include very few secular subjects, claims the report. It says: “Their aim is not to prepare pupils for life in the wider world, but to give them the tools for a more limited existence inside the Muslim enclaves.”

The consequences for bright Muslim British girls are absolutely dire. Lively intellects are being destroyed and brilliant careers cut off before they can begin. To quote the report again: “Every year, an incalculable number of Muslim teenagers and young women are lost to the wider world that informs their citizenship.”

The numbers are increasing fast, and there is confusion over how many schools exist. The growth of non-Muslim schools, says MacEoin, is “hugely overshadowed by a rapidly growing sector of Muslim institutions. These now number 127 [sic] full-time schools and an estimated 700 part-time madrassas for intense religious instruction [and that doesn’t include the Darul Uloom seminaries] … Many recreate in the UK the style and content of schooling that can be found in Pakistan, Bangladesh and India.” Great.

And all this is happening with the implicit consent of the Government, Ofsted – and Christian leaders, who bang on about the threat to “faith schools” (and, in the case of R. Williams, the virtues of Sharia) while shielding their eyes from the evidence that many Muslim faith schools are poisonously anti-Christian.

I’ve seen many of the extremely damaging screen grabs on which MacEoin bases his claims. Memo to the Muslim Council of Britain: start lining up irate spokesmen now.

---