• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    November 2013
    M T W T F S S
    « Oct   Dec »
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    wearenegroes on Will Hillary Clinton Run Again…
    Al Dajjal (@AlDajjal… on Where are the “Moderate…
    esgort on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    IB on Why Gun Ownership is Biblical…
    NEW White House Insi… on Hitler and the muslim bro…
  • Archives

  • Advertisements

Evolving into a Second-Rate Military

Our ‘progressive‘ government (progressives used to call themselves communists until that became ‘uncool’ in America) is allowing, no, FORCING our military to become second rate while the welfare, EBT cards for booze and strip clubs, and Obamaphones continue to flow.

Remind me again which is actually called for in the Constitution.  Pretty sure it’s the military.

Military Alters Training to Deal With Budget Woes

Nov 25, 2013

Associated Press| by Brett Barrouquere and Susanne M. Schafer

FORT CAMPBELL, Ky. — The skies above Shaw Air Force Base in central South Carolina and the fields across Fort Campbell on the Tennessee-Kentucky line have been a bit quieter in recent months.

Budget cuts to the military have forced installations around the country to alter training exercises and daily routines to save money. For airmen and pilots, that means fewer flights. For soldiers and Marines, it means fewer drills or delaying them until a deployment nears.

The automatic budget cuts, known as sequestration, come as the military is in the midst of a drawdown in Afghanistan and shrinking its overall size.

The Army has retooled training regimens to focus on soldiers deploying to Afghanistan and Korea — those who will be in hostile areas soonest, said George Wright, a civilian Army spokesman in Washington. The Army curtailed training to smaller units of eight to 14 soldiers each — the squad level — for 80 percent of the fighting force in fiscal year 2013 and canceled seven Brigade Combat Team training center rotations.

In cases where only part of a brigade is deploying from Fort Campbell, some soldiers are being pushed into field training while others are held back until their departure date draws nearer, spokesman Bob Jenkins said.”That way, we’re able to meet the requirements for the people being trained for deployment and make sure they had all the things that were required,” Jenkins said. “If people were supposed to go out and shoot 500 rounds one day, they went out and fired 500 rounds. That didn’t change.”

The 77th Fighter Squadron, one of three that make up the 20th Fighter Wing at Shaw, was told to stand down in April after it returned from a six-month deployment to Afghanistan. It was one of several groups in the 9th Air Force ordered to idle jets for weeks in response to the automatic budget cuts.

Col. Clark Quinn, the F-16 wing’s vice commander, said the pilots were given the vacation time they would have normally taken and then put into ground training, such as on computer simulators. It gave them a chance to rest, and polish up some of their technical skills, he said.

“They were not flying. Their aircraft were just parked,” Quinn said. The maintenance support units worked on other aircraft to stay sharp, he said.

The pilots and airmen are now back on their regular training schedules, Quinn said.

Over the summer, the 2nd Squadron, 17th Cavalry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell anticipated cuts would come and purchased helicopter parts that typically need replacing, rather waiting to buy them when equipment failed. The move has allowed the regiment to keep flying, even if on a more limited basis, once the cutbacks kicked in, said Maj. Matt Wolfe.

“We had to cut down flight hours for a while with the funding issues,” Wolfe said. “But, we’ve been flying on the cheap. The only thing we cost them is fuel.”

Navy Lt. Rob Myers at the Pentagon said budget cuts have forced the Naval Air Forces to trim flight hours for aviators back to 11 hours per aviator per month – the minimum needed to maintain flight proficiency. Pilots are turning to simulators to get in flight hours beyond the minimum.

“Our deploying forces are properly manned, trained and equipped to meet all mission requirements. Our non-deployers have had some degradation due to impacts based on exercise cancellations, port visits cancellations, schools cancellations, flight hours reduced,” Myers said.

Col. Steve Yackley, deputy commander at Fort Jackson outside Columbia, said the post continues to train about 45,000 soldiers annually and expects to get the money to do so for the next two years. It is the Army’s largest training installation and trains about half the service’s new soldiers every year.

“We are a little protected,” Yackley said. But he said the installation has to look for savings in other ways. At both Shaw and Fort Jackson, grass isn’t cut as diligently and repairs to buildings are made only in emergencies.

Fort Campbell has undertaken similar steps, stopping reunions for former soldiers and health and informational sessions for soldiers and their families.

“If we could do without it, we did,” Jenkins said.

Along with maintenance and training delays, some soldiers are being put to new tasks while not deployed.

Capt. J. Stephen Donaldson, company commander of 551st Military Police at Fort Campbell, is teaching soldiers who recently returned from deployment how to handle post security. Donaldson’s job entails taking 72 soldiers, from the infantry and supply, and teaching them how to use pepper spray and work security at the entrance gates to the post. The soldiers will work security on a six-month rotation.

The soldiers will fill in for two platoons from the 716th MP Battalion deployed overseas. With two more platoons headed out soon, the extra hands are needed to avoid hiring private contractors.

For the soldiers, shuffling training schedules and cutbacks are difficult, but nothing they say they can’t handle.

“It sucks, but you do what you need to do,” Spc. Chris Allen said after returning to Fort Campbell in October from six months in Afghanistan.

— Associated Press reporter Julie Watson in San Diego, Calif., contributed to this report. Barrouquere reported from Fort Campbell, Ky., and Louisville, Ky. Schafer reported from Columbia, S.C., and Shaw Air Force Base, S.C.

Link to article: http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/11/25/military-alters-training-to-deal-with-budget-woes.html?ESRC=eb.nl


4 Responses

  1. I encourage you to check out our post on how cutting human services programs–like the EBT cards you mention–are also hurting the military and military families:


    Sequestration cuts all of discretionary spending, not just defense spending. The most advanced military equipment and training programs are useless without quality people to join the military.


  2. Yes, sequestration hurt more than just the military. But it disproportionately hurt the military, one of the very few things spelled out in the Constitution that the government is supposed to provide, and for which the government is supposed to collect taxes. Instead, we see the more and more social programs, none of which are being cut, while our military is being dismantled. The vast intrusion of the federal government into nearly ever aspect of our lives has created dependence rather than self reliance. The fact that we have military families on welfare is an absolute shame on our nation.


  3. I agree it’s a shame that military families rely on welfare to supplement their income. Just as it’s a shame we have full-time workers who rely on welfare as well, or trained, capable workers without jobs. I’d like to point out that it’s not true sequestration has disproportionally hurt the military. For the past two years, spending has been juggled to off-set some of the cuts to military, while social programs were continually cut. Our military is far from being dismantled. I think we both agree that jobs for all and a living wage would ensure that our population is self sufficient and that our economy can support such a vast military.


  4. The term “living wage” is a Marxist creation. The concept creates a “right” to a specific standard of living where no such right exists because it was not earned. Like most other things Marxist and progressive, it distorts reality. It forces an employer to pay a wage based on a PERCEIVED right, and a DESIRED standard of living, rather than the actual worth of the employee’s labor. If you are a high school dropout whose only skill is flipping burgers and mopping floors, your labor isn’t worth $15/hr until you improve your skills and education, making yourself more valuable to the company, in which case you will likely be promoted. If the employer is forced to pay such a person $15/hr to flip burgers, there are three basic possible outcomes. The price of hamburgers goes up to a point where consumers won’t buy enough of them to pay the new salary, the employer fires the employee and installs roboburger to flip his burgers, or the employer goes out of business. That’s just reality.

    We will simply have to disagree on the dismantling of the military. As a 20 year veteran, I think I’m somewhat qualified to make the assessment that our capabilities and ability to project force have degraded significantly over the last two decades. That rate of degradation has accelerated over the last 5-7 years as aging weapon systems haven’t been replaced, or when they are, not in sufficient numbers to counter the likely threats. To pay for what little recapitalization we are able to manage, thousands of servicemen will be shown the door, while those who remain are seeing pay and benefits erode. We are now being seen as weak by potential adversaries, emboldening them to take action they would have never considered when we were a stronger military. Chinese actions in relation to Japan are a prime example.

    Can we afford a military able to take on all comers, and more importantly DETER them from coming, while at the same time being generously charitable to many of our less fortunate citizens? Only IF we have an economy that will generate enough revenue. The simple fact is that we CAN’T have the whole enchilada. Over $17 trillion in debt and counting pretty clearly illustrates that. And a centralized, command economy like the one we are moving towards will NEVER generate the wealth required to pay for the required and all the desired spending, much less pay down the debt.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: