• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    March 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb   Apr »
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Orville on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Desi Chinese on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Oto ekspertiz Kaç li… on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Al Dajjal (@AlDajjal… on Where are the “Moderate…
    esgort on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
  • Archives

  • Advertisements

This Is Why They ALL Must Go

Vote EVERY politician out of office.  Get fresh blood and perspectives in there.  Get people in office who remember that the work for America, we don’t work for them.  Then vote THEM out so they don’t have time to be corrupted by the power they have access to.  Keep voting them out until they listen to us and institute their own term limits, remove the life long pensions, and undo all the harm that we have allowed them to do to US and to America for the last century.

But what do we do when voting no longer works?


Senate Says No to Proposed Earmark Ban


Fifteen Republicans joined most Democrats in rejecting the moratorium on earmarks, which opponents say are often wasteful and invite corruption

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Tuesday easily killed a move by conservative Republicans to temporarily ban senators from earmarking spending bills with back-home projects like roads, water projects and grants to local governments.

Fifteen Republicans joined with most Democrats in rejecting the moratorium on earmarks by a 68-29 vote.

It’s a far different story in the House, where Republicans imposed an earmark ban on party members last week in a bid to demonstrate they are the party of reform in Washington. Democrats controlling the House also declared that earmarks can no longer go to for-profit companies whose executives and hired lobbyists too often return the favor with campaign contributions.

Fights over earmarks are routine and usually intensify in campaign years as lawmakers seek the political high ground with voters unhappy with out of control spending and the ways of Washington.

Still, since Democrats took over Congress, significant reforms have been put in place to reduce the number and cost of earmarks and make the process more open to the public.

This year’s debate on earmarks follows a House Ethics Committee investigation of seven lawmakers suspected of taking campaign donations linked to companies that benefited from earmarks. The seven were absolved of wrongdoing, but the report illustrated the pay-to-play perceptions of some earmark seekers.

Defenders of earmarks say they represent but a small portion of the overall budget, are a legitimate way for lawmakers to exercise Congress’ power of the purse, and that they know the needs of their states better than agency bureaucrats.

“We will have these decisions made by unelected bureaucrats in back rooms of agencies scattered all over this city,” said Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii. “I don’t understand why those who are the most opposed to the policies of the current president are so intent on putting additional power into his hands and those who serve the executive branch.”

Opponents say earmarks are often wasteful, invite corruption and are a way to win votes for big-spending legislation.

The ban attempt came on an amendment by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., to an unrelated air safety measure.

“The engine is what pulls the whole train and earmarks are what pull through a lot of spending and a lot of borrowing,” DeMint said.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: