• Meta

  • Click on the calendar for summaries of posts by day, week, or month.

    February 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan   Mar »
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Orville on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Desi Chinese on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Oto ekspertiz Kaç li… on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
    Al Dajjal (@AlDajjal… on Where are the “Moderate…
    esgort on Religion of Peace Update: Musl…
  • Archives

  • Advertisements

The Deniers of the Deniers are in Denial

Global warming/climate change theorists and supporters call those of us who don’t believe their load of crap “deniers” in an effort to associate us with people who deny the Holocaust.  This is like Mao Tse Tung calling Hitler a mass murderer.  A bit hypocritical, don’t you think?

The global warming theories have been repeatedly and scientifically debunked, yet the people who support these theories (and the control they hope to gain over us by implementing them) refuse to accept the fact that they have been exposed as frauds.

The naive who actually believe global warming/climate change theory to be true, ignore proof to the contrary and exposition of the attempts to “cook” the data in support of those theories.  Things such as temperature reporting points around the world being ‘cherry picked’ to provide only the reporting stations in the warmest locations.  Things like leaving solar activity data out of their theory.  Things like one sample from one tree in one spot on the earth being used to ‘extrapolate’ data on global warming.  Things like the never ending list of exaggerations and outright lies uncovered in report after report.

These “deniers of the deniers” have this Utopian mental snapshot of what they think the earth should be.  They think that it never changes, and isn’t supposed to change, but when it does that man caused it.

Were their theories about SUV’s and man-made global warming true, it would have to be so bad that Mars warmed, and is now cooling at the same rate as earth.  I’m pretty sure we didn’t cause Mars to warm or cool.

NOAA has the gall to release a report that global warming is still happening after the IPCC and East Anglia CRC balloon has already burst, and in the middle of most of the norther hemisphere experiencing the coldest winter on record.  Tell those in the northeast who are digging out from 36″ or more of “global warming” how hot the earth is getting.

These fools don’t understand that the earth has ALWAYS been changing.  Weather patterns change over time, ice ages come and go, tides rise and fall, animal species appear and disappear.  What they refuse to accept is that man is still around because of OUR ABILITY TO ADAPT TO THESE CHANGES.

Yes, man does pollute the world, and that needs to change.  The simple need to breathe clean air and drink clean water should drive that change.  To cook up some other lie in an attempt to redistribute wealth and exert control over populations is disingenuous, and downright evil.


U.N. climate panel admits Dutch sea level flaw

OSLO (Reuters) – The U.N. panel of climate experts overstated how much of the Netherlands is below sea level, according to a preliminary report on Saturday, admitting yet another flaw after a row last month over Himalayan glacier melt.

A background note by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said a 2007 report wrongly stated that 55 percent of the country was below sea level since the figure included areas above sea level, prone to flooding along rivers.

The United Nations has said errors in the 2007 report of about 3,000 pages do not affect the core conclusions that human activities, led by burning fossil fuels, are warming the globe. (To quote the Botox Bolshevik, Nancy Pelosi, “Are you serious? Are you serious?”)

2 Responses

  1. texan2driver:

    I read a lot ( A LOT) of blogs on this subject, hoping to get information about the various aspects global warming. I doesn’t matter that I think manmade warming is a scam, or what your take on it is.

    I’m commenting on your article to let you know that your “…load of crap deniers…” is a discriminating phrase, at least for me. I don’t have time to fool around with artcles written by someone who cannot express their ideas using standard English. I read that phrase and came to a screeching halt. I then closed the window and moved on. Why not… I don’t have time to read what some Redneck wrote (that’s the picture your words painted you to be). People who write using such words ruin their credibility. People using such words convey the idea that they’re just venting, not actually in possession of any substantive message for readers.

    I returned to your article to write this comment to you. Perhaps you have something truly worthwhile to say, and that a word about your writing “style” might be enlightening and help you come across in the future as worth reading. You’ll never know without giving it a try. It takes a lot of work to write articles such as you have done. Don’t shoot yourself in the foot and ruin all of your hard work.

  2. Jeff,
    Thanks for the feedback. I’ll consider that more carefully in future posts. However, I do indeed believe that man-caused global warming is a “load of crap,” or if you prefer, a “large body of faulty science based on fraudulently presented, inaccurate, incomplete data.” Even the chief architects of the deception have basically admitted as much. The scheme has crumbled to its foundation.

    Global warming proponents said the earth was warming when it wasn’t. Then they said that the earth was cooling BECAUSE OF GLOBAL WARMING. Then they changed the name of their cause from global warming to “climate change.” They still hold to the theory that CO2 causes both warming and cooling. Do you see the logical fallacy in that argument. There are so many ways to point out the fraud of man-caused global warming that it’s hard for me to understand how a rational person can see the evidence and not come to the conclusion that it is a fraud.

    I don’t in any way intend to be insulting. I hope whether you read my material, or someone else’s that you will simply stay engaged. Part of free speech is hearing things that may offend you sometimes. If you are offended, at least try to get to the substance of the material and voice your opinion rather than just shutting down because of someone’s choice of words. If you don’t, then no communication or dialogue takes place, and therefore no learning.

    Thanks again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: