‘Veracity’ is a Pretty Big Word for Robert Gibbs

Gibbs, you are a sad, sad little man.  The burden of proof is on the government to prove that forcing Americans to buy things they don’t want from the government IS constitutional!  You may get your liberal judges to rule that it is, but the constitution says otherwise.

In the beginning the founding fathers were wise enough to right into the constitution that any powers not specifically granted to the government shall remain with the states and the people.  The constitution DOES NOT delineate the power for the government to force us to buy their insurance, and trying to say that the “General Welfare” clause or the “Commerce” clause give them the power is blatant intentional misinterpretation of and disregard for the founding fathers words and intent.

We are not as stupid as you snobbish, liberal, power-hungry tyrants in Washington and elsewhere would like to think.  Right now we the people are the underdogs in this fight, but we are not impotent.  You can only push us as far as we let you, and you have pretty much reached that limit.


http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=56264

White House Says No ‘Veracity’ to Argument That Forcing Individuals to Buy Health Insurance Is Unconstitutional

Thursday, October 29, 2009
By Fred Lucas, Staff Writer
(CNSNews.com) – White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs told CNSNews.com on Wednesday that there is no “veracity” to the argument that the U.S. Constitution does not authorize the federal government to force individuals to buy health insurance.

The Congressional Budget Office has said that the federal government has never before in American history forced Americans to purchase any good or service.

When the health-care bill was being debated in the Senate Finance Committee, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), the former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, raised questions about the constitutionality of forcing Americans to buy health insurance, which all congressional versions of the health care bill would do.

Hatch rejected the notion that the Commerce Clause–which empowers Congress to regulate commerce “among the several states”–justifies forcing Americans to purchase a product they do not want to buy. If Congress can make people buy health insurance, Hatch argued, they can force Americans to buy refrigerators or new cars.

But Gibbs said those who make this kind of argument have no federal court cases to back them up.  (Nor do you, pinhead.  If the constitution doesn’t specifically state that you, the government, have the power in question, then you DO NOT have that power.)

“I won’t be confused as a constitutional scholar, but I don’t believe there’s a lot of–I don’t believe there’s a lot of case law that would demonstrate the veracity of what they’re commentating on,” said Gibbs.  (He wouldn’t be confused as ANY type of scholar.)

Asked by CNSNews.com last week where specifically the Constitution authorizes Congress to mandate that individuals buy health insurance, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said, “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

A Congressional Research Service report concluded that requiring individuals to purchase or have health insurance could be challenged.

“Whether such a requirement would be constitutional under the Commerce Clause is perhaps the most challenging question posed by such a proposal, as it is a novel issue whether Congress may use this clause to require an individual to purchase a good or service,” the CRS reportedly says.

In 1994, when the Clinton administration attempted to push a health care reform plan through a Democratic Congress that also mandated every American buy health insurance, the Congressional Budget Office determined that the government had never ordered Americans to buy anything.

“The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States,” the CBO analysis said. “An individual mandate would have two features that, in combination, would make it unique. First, it would impose a duty on individuals as members of society. Second, it would require people to purchase a specific service that would be heavily regulated by the federal government.”


Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: